CAJ | 학술논문

在权利所指示的事物以及权利话语本身在一个不断产生、变化和发展的意义上，对权利的解释就需要某种理论，而不是一个抽象界定的概念。对于权利这个事物的解释，现行学者分别从不同的路径出发对权利展开了分析，由此形成了抽象权利、具体权利以及真正权利三种权利形态。然而，诸种对于权利的界定之所以出现种种困难和问题，原因在于它们不自觉地以事实性的语言侵蚀甚至替换了权利所表征的正当性内涵，同时他们对于权利实践中问题的认识也存在偏差。合约这个概念的属性以及权利这个事物不完全界定的特征，使得合约可以成为分析权利问题的一个合适理论框架。合约是权利内在生成的机制。当然，用合约分析权利问题也并非完美无缺。
재권리소지시적사물이급권리화어본신재일개불단산생、변화화발전적의의상，대권리적해석취수요모충이론，이불시일개추상계정적개념。대우권리저개사물적해석，현행학자분별종불동적로경출발대권리전개료분석，유차형성료추상권리、구체권리이급진정권리삼충권리형태。연이，제충대우권리적계정지소이출현충충곤난화문제，원인재우타문불자각지이사실성적어언침식심지체환료권리소표정적정당성내함，동시타문대우권리실천중문제적인식야존재편차。합약저개개념적속성이급권리저개사물불완전계정적특정，사득합약가이성위분석권리문제적일개합괄이론광가。합약시권리내재생성적궤제。당연，용합약분석권리문제야병비완미무결。
The interpretation of rights requires a certain theory rather than an abstract concept since the substance referred by rights and the discourse of rights itself are constantly changing and developing overtime. With regard to interpretation of rights,scholars have followed different paths for analysis so as to form three types of rights namely abstract rights,specific rights and authentic rights. However,definitions of rights have encountered predicaments since these theories have involuntarily eroded or even substituted the due content of rights by factual language and they also have misconceptions in practice of rights. In light of the feature of def-inition of contract and the incomplete definition of rights,contract can be used as a proper theoretical frame for analysis of rights for contract is the innate mechanism of rights though such method is not flawless.