河北农业科学
河北農業科學
하북농업과학
Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences
2015年
5期
86-91
,共6页
赵星%张嘉楠%刘宇琨%张亚洲%杨华%王瑾%宋亚辉%陈四龙%李玉荣
趙星%張嘉楠%劉宇琨%張亞洲%楊華%王瑾%宋亞輝%陳四龍%李玉榮
조성%장가남%류우곤%장아주%양화%왕근%송아휘%진사룡%리옥영
花生%油酸%亚油酸%超声波辅助提取
花生%油痠%亞油痠%超聲波輔助提取
화생%유산%아유산%초성파보조제취
Peanut%Oleic acid%Linoleic acid%Ultrasonic-assisted extraction
花生原料中油酸和亚油酸含量是影响花生油品质的重要因素。本研究采用气相色谱技术,以十七烷酸甲酯为内标,初步建立了测定花生仁中油酸和亚油酸含量的超声波辅助提取法,旨为花生品质的全面评价提供参考依据。本研究通过单因素试验,考察了方法中提取溶剂种类、料液比、超声时间、浸泡时间、提取温度对油酸和亚油酸提取效率的影响,结果显示,采用超声波辅助提取法提取花生仁中的油酸和亚油酸时,用正己烷做溶剂,单因素最佳水平为料液比1:10(g/mL)、浸泡30 min,在45℃下超声(功率250 W)20 min;并将所建立的超声波辅助提取法与传统的浸渍法和索氏提取法进行了提取效果比较,结果显示,该方法操作简便、提取效率高、重复性好,优于传统的浸渍法和索氏提取法,可满足花生仁中油酸和亚油酸含量测定的需要。
花生原料中油痠和亞油痠含量是影響花生油品質的重要因素。本研究採用氣相色譜技術,以十七烷痠甲酯為內標,初步建立瞭測定花生仁中油痠和亞油痠含量的超聲波輔助提取法,旨為花生品質的全麵評價提供參攷依據。本研究通過單因素試驗,攷察瞭方法中提取溶劑種類、料液比、超聲時間、浸泡時間、提取溫度對油痠和亞油痠提取效率的影響,結果顯示,採用超聲波輔助提取法提取花生仁中的油痠和亞油痠時,用正己烷做溶劑,單因素最佳水平為料液比1:10(g/mL)、浸泡30 min,在45℃下超聲(功率250 W)20 min;併將所建立的超聲波輔助提取法與傳統的浸漬法和索氏提取法進行瞭提取效果比較,結果顯示,該方法操作簡便、提取效率高、重複性好,優于傳統的浸漬法和索氏提取法,可滿足花生仁中油痠和亞油痠含量測定的需要。
화생원료중유산화아유산함량시영향화생유품질적중요인소。본연구채용기상색보기술,이십칠완산갑지위내표,초보건립료측정화생인중유산화아유산함량적초성파보조제취법,지위화생품질적전면평개제공삼고의거。본연구통과단인소시험,고찰료방법중제취용제충류、료액비、초성시간、침포시간、제취온도대유산화아유산제취효솔적영향,결과현시,채용초성파보조제취법제취화생인중적유산화아유산시,용정기완주용제,단인소최가수평위료액비1:10(g/mL)、침포30 min,재45℃하초성(공솔250 W)20 min;병장소건립적초성파보조제취법여전통적침지법화색씨제취법진행료제취효과비교,결과현시,해방법조작간편、제취효솔고、중복성호,우우전통적침지법화색씨제취법,가만족화생인중유산화아유산함량측정적수요。
The contents of oleic acid and linoleic acid in the raw materials of peanut is an important factor affecting the quality of peanut oil.In this study,an initial method of the ultrasonic-assisted extraction of oleic acid and linoleic acid in peanut was established to provide references for the comprehensive evaluation of peanut quality. This method was established by gas chromatography, using methyl heptadecanoate as the internal standard. By a single factor test,the influences factors of extraction efficiency of oleic acid and linoleic acid were studied, such as extracting solvent, solid-to-liquid ratio, immersion time , ultrasonic extraction time and temperature. And then, immersion and soxhlet extractor method were compared with the method we established.The results showed that the optimal ultrasonic-assisted extraction conditions were n-hexane as the best extraction solvent, 1:10 (g/mL) of solid-to-liquid, 20 min of ultrasonic extraction time at 45 ℃after immers ed for 30 min. The simple, efficient and reproducible method was superior to immersion and so xhlet extractor method, and it was suitable for the quantitative analysis of oleic acid and linoleic acid.