全科口腔医学电子杂志
全科口腔醫學電子雜誌
전과구강의학전자잡지
The Department of Oral Medicine Electronic Magazine (Electronic Edition)
2015年
7期
109-112
,共4页
于玲敏%兖顺%丛良亮%于伶俐%金光春
于玲敏%兗順%叢良亮%于伶俐%金光春
우령민%연순%총량량%우령리%금광춘
表面粗糙%精密颈部%边缘骨吸收%影响
錶麵粗糙%精密頸部%邊緣骨吸收%影響
표면조조%정밀경부%변연골흡수%영향
Rough surface%Polished neck%Marginal bone level%Infl uence
目的:分析比较种植体表面在水平边缘骨的宏观和微观结构。方法随机选择骨量充足术式单一的患者20例作为研究对象,采用以下三种种植体系统:奥齿泰USII 系统(韩国奥齿泰株式会社,18枚), CDIC 系统(四川大学口腔种植中心,22枚),安克劳斯系统(德国菲亚丹公司,21枚)。术式采用单一的一段式非潜入式手术法。按术后第3个月和第6个月两个时间段做临床影像学观察。结果奥齿泰USII系统在两个时间段骨量吸收显著,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。安克劳斯系统组(0.17±0.14 mm)显示骨吸收量最低(P<0.05),CDIC系统组(0.69±0.19 mm)与奥齿泰USII系统组(1.05±0.24 mm)除了在第一时间段骨吸收量显著减少外,CDIC系统组在3~6个月的时间段趋于稳定(P>0.05)。而三种种植体系统组与上、下颌骨植入点边缘的骨吸收量无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论种植体边缘的骨吸收量会因其颈部设计的不同而不同,即精密颈部与微观表面结构的种植体系统比宏观表面的种植体系统边缘骨质更稳定。
目的:分析比較種植體錶麵在水平邊緣骨的宏觀和微觀結構。方法隨機選擇骨量充足術式單一的患者20例作為研究對象,採用以下三種種植體繫統:奧齒泰USII 繫統(韓國奧齒泰株式會社,18枚), CDIC 繫統(四川大學口腔種植中心,22枚),安剋勞斯繫統(德國菲亞丹公司,21枚)。術式採用單一的一段式非潛入式手術法。按術後第3箇月和第6箇月兩箇時間段做臨床影像學觀察。結果奧齒泰USII繫統在兩箇時間段骨量吸收顯著,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。安剋勞斯繫統組(0.17±0.14 mm)顯示骨吸收量最低(P<0.05),CDIC繫統組(0.69±0.19 mm)與奧齒泰USII繫統組(1.05±0.24 mm)除瞭在第一時間段骨吸收量顯著減少外,CDIC繫統組在3~6箇月的時間段趨于穩定(P>0.05)。而三種種植體繫統組與上、下頜骨植入點邊緣的骨吸收量無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論種植體邊緣的骨吸收量會因其頸部設計的不同而不同,即精密頸部與微觀錶麵結構的種植體繫統比宏觀錶麵的種植體繫統邊緣骨質更穩定。
목적:분석비교충식체표면재수평변연골적굉관화미관결구。방법수궤선택골량충족술식단일적환자20례작위연구대상,채용이하삼충충식체계통:오치태USII 계통(한국오치태주식회사,18매), CDIC 계통(사천대학구강충식중심,22매),안극로사계통(덕국비아단공사,21매)。술식채용단일적일단식비잠입식수술법。안술후제3개월화제6개월량개시간단주림상영상학관찰。결과오치태USII계통재량개시간단골량흡수현저,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。안극로사계통조(0.17±0.14 mm)현시골흡수량최저(P<0.05),CDIC계통조(0.69±0.19 mm)여오치태USII계통조(1.05±0.24 mm)제료재제일시간단골흡수량현저감소외,CDIC계통조재3~6개월적시간단추우은정(P>0.05)。이삼충충식체계통조여상、하합골식입점변연적골흡수량무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론충식체변연적골흡수량회인기경부설계적불동이불동,즉정밀경부여미관표면결구적충식체계통비굉관표면적충식체계통변연골질경은정。
ObjectiveThrough the comparison and analysis of macro and micro of the fixture surface on the surrounding bone level.MethodsThe author as the dentist for this surgery. Randomly selected 20 patients with the bone sufficient simple surgery method,using the three implant systems groups:Osstem system groups (Osstem co.LTD of South Korea,18) with a rough screw surface and a polished neck,CDIC system groups (The implant center in SiChuan university of China,22) with a rough surface,Ankylos system groups (Friadent of Germany,21) with micro-screw thread neck.The way using one stage simple method surgery (After loading).Tow periods of 3 month and 6 month for iconography observation.ResultsSmall bone absorption in Osstem USII system were statistically significant (P<0.05).Ankylos system group (0.17±0.14mm) according to lowest bone absorption,showed CDIC system group (0.69±0.19 mm) and Osstem system group (1.05±0.24 mm) in the first period(3 month) is a very ting amounts bone of absorption,but in the second period(3~6 month) tends to stable(P>0.05).Threeimplant system groups were no statistically signifi cant difference in the amount of bone level changes of upper and lower jaws in each system (P>0.05 mm).ConclusionThe marginal bone level of absorption depending on the design and the result will be different,The implant with marginal bone level of the precision and the surface of the microscopic structure of the result more stable than the surface of the macro.