中华航海医学与高气压医学杂志
中華航海醫學與高氣壓醫學雜誌
중화항해의학여고기압의학잡지
Chinese Journal of Nautical Medicine and Hyperbaric Medicine
2015年
5期
371-373
,共3页
暴风雨灾害%应急救护系统%临床救治%海岛
暴風雨災害%應急救護繫統%臨床救治%海島
폭풍우재해%응급구호계통%림상구치%해도
Hurricane disaster%Emergency medical care system%Clinical medical aid%Island
目的 探讨改进应急救护系统用于暴风雨灾害临床急救的效果.方法 以海口市暴风雨应急救护的患者400例作为研究对象,分为对照组和实验组,每组200例,对发生暴风雨灾害时的患者一般情况、医院的临床急救反应时间、患者的生存状况以及患者对应急救护系统的满意度等系列指标进行回顾性比较分析.结果 应急救护系统前后,临床对于暴风雨灾害临床急救效果存在明显的差别.对照组临床急救反应时间17～75 min,平均(37.3 ±13.1)min;实验组6～ 49 min,平均(19.8 ±6.9) min,2组差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).实验组病死率1.5％,明显低于对照组5.0％(P＜0.05).实验组患者对于临床应急救护的满意率95.5％,明显高于对照组患者满意率83.5％(P＜0.05).结论 改进应急救护系统使台风灾害时的临床应急准备、灾前预防、灾后救援、灾情检测效果有明显提高.这一改进可以对受暴风雨灾害的患者提供及时、准确、有效的救护,有利于患者的救治和恢复.
目的 探討改進應急救護繫統用于暴風雨災害臨床急救的效果.方法 以海口市暴風雨應急救護的患者400例作為研究對象,分為對照組和實驗組,每組200例,對髮生暴風雨災害時的患者一般情況、醫院的臨床急救反應時間、患者的生存狀況以及患者對應急救護繫統的滿意度等繫列指標進行迴顧性比較分析.結果 應急救護繫統前後,臨床對于暴風雨災害臨床急救效果存在明顯的差彆.對照組臨床急救反應時間17～75 min,平均(37.3 ±13.1)min;實驗組6～ 49 min,平均(19.8 ±6.9) min,2組差異有統計學意義(P＜0.05).實驗組病死率1.5％,明顯低于對照組5.0％(P＜0.05).實驗組患者對于臨床應急救護的滿意率95.5％,明顯高于對照組患者滿意率83.5％(P＜0.05).結論 改進應急救護繫統使檯風災害時的臨床應急準備、災前預防、災後救援、災情檢測效果有明顯提高.這一改進可以對受暴風雨災害的患者提供及時、準確、有效的救護,有利于患者的救治和恢複.
목적 탐토개진응급구호계통용우폭풍우재해림상급구적효과.방법 이해구시폭풍우응급구호적환자400례작위연구대상,분위대조조화실험조,매조200례,대발생폭풍우재해시적환자일반정황、의원적림상급구반응시간、환자적생존상황이급환자대응급구호계통적만의도등계렬지표진행회고성비교분석.결과 응급구호계통전후,림상대우폭풍우재해림상급구효과존재명현적차별.대조조림상급구반응시간17～75 min,평균(37.3 ±13.1)min;실험조6～ 49 min,평균(19.8 ±6.9) min,2조차이유통계학의의(P＜0.05).실험조병사솔1.5％,명현저우대조조5.0％(P＜0.05).실험조환자대우림상응급구호적만의솔95.5％,명현고우대조조환자만의솔83.5％(P＜0.05).결론 개진응급구호계통사태풍재해시적림상응급준비、재전예방、재후구원、재정검측효과유명현제고.저일개진가이대수폭풍우재해적환자제공급시、준학、유효적구호,유리우환자적구치화회복.
Objective To investigate the efficiency of the improved emergency care system in urgent medical aid of casualties occurred during hurricane disasters.Methods Four hundred patients who received urgent medical care during hurricane disasters were used as our research subjects, and they were randomly divided into the control and experimental groups.Retrospective survey and analysis were made on the general conditions of the casualties at the time of the hurricane disaster relief, urgent medical response time, the surviving conditions of the casualties and satisfaction to the application of the improved emergency care system.Results Significant differences could be noted in the clinical effects of urgent medical care during hurricane disaster relief, when comparisons were made with or without the application of the improved emergency care system.Urgent medical response time of the control group was 17 to 75 minutes, averaging (37.3 ± 13.13) minutes, while that of the experimental group was 6 to 49 minutes, averaging (19.8 ± 6.9) minutes.Significant statistics could be found, when comparisons were made between them(P ＜ 0.05).The mortality rate of the experimental group was 1.5％, which was significantly lower than 5.0％ of the control group (P ＜0.05).The satisfaction rate on the part of the patients in the experimental group was 95.5％, which was significantly higher than 83.5％ of the control group(P ＜ 0.05).Conclusions The improved emergency care system could significantly improve clinical emergency preparedness, pre-disaster prevention, disaster relief, as well as disaster predication.The improved system could enable medical facilities to provide in-time, accurate and effective medical care to the victims during hurricane disasters, and was obviously beneficial to the medical aid and recovery of casualties.
