中华医学美学美容杂志
中華醫學美學美容雜誌
중화의학미학미용잡지
Chinese Journal of Medical Aesthetics and Cosmetology
2015年
5期
290-292
,共3页
瓷睿刻蓝光照相%数字化印模%牙体预备
瓷睿刻藍光照相%數字化印模%牙體預備
자예각람광조상%수자화인모%아체예비
CEREC Bluecam%Digital impressions%Tooth preparation
目的 探索瓷睿刻蓝光照相(CEREC Bluecam)数字化印模技术在口腔固定桥修复牙体预备中的应用价值.方法 将行3单位固定桥修复的80例患者牙体粗备后按随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,观察组40例用瓷睿刻蓝光照相数字化印模进行检查,对照组40例用常规方法检查.用CEREC4.2软件和石膏模型对肩台宽度均匀、肩台平滑连续、肩台边缘平整、轴壁无倒凹、轴面聚合度良好、咬合空间适合、共同就位道良好等进行评价.结果 肩台宽度均匀、肩台平滑连续、肩台边缘平整、轴壁无倒凹、轴面聚合度良好、咬合空间适合、共同就位道良好,观察组和对照组数字化印模评价良好的分别为95.0％(38例)对62.5％(25例),92.5％(37例)对77.5％(31例),97.5％(39例)对75.0％(30例),95.0％(38例)对72.5％(29例),90.0％(36例)对65.0％(26例),100.0％(40例)对52.5％(21例),97.5％(39例)对75.0％(30例),差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05);而石膏模型评价良好的分别为87.5％(35例)对60.0％(24例),97.5％(39例)对70.0％(30例),90.0％(36例)对62.5％(25例),95.0％(38例)对75.0％(30例),92.5％(37例)对70.0％(28例),100.0％(40例)对72.5％(29例),100.0％(40例)对65.0％(26例),差异均有统计学意义(均P＜0.05).结论 CEREC Bluecam数字化印模辅助下的牙体预备质量均优于传统方法.
目的 探索瓷睿刻藍光照相(CEREC Bluecam)數字化印模技術在口腔固定橋脩複牙體預備中的應用價值.方法 將行3單位固定橋脩複的80例患者牙體粗備後按隨機數字錶法分為觀察組和對照組,觀察組40例用瓷睿刻藍光照相數字化印模進行檢查,對照組40例用常規方法檢查.用CEREC4.2軟件和石膏模型對肩檯寬度均勻、肩檯平滑連續、肩檯邊緣平整、軸壁無倒凹、軸麵聚閤度良好、咬閤空間適閤、共同就位道良好等進行評價.結果 肩檯寬度均勻、肩檯平滑連續、肩檯邊緣平整、軸壁無倒凹、軸麵聚閤度良好、咬閤空間適閤、共同就位道良好,觀察組和對照組數字化印模評價良好的分彆為95.0％(38例)對62.5％(25例),92.5％(37例)對77.5％(31例),97.5％(39例)對75.0％(30例),95.0％(38例)對72.5％(29例),90.0％(36例)對65.0％(26例),100.0％(40例)對52.5％(21例),97.5％(39例)對75.0％(30例),差異均有統計學意義(P＜0.05);而石膏模型評價良好的分彆為87.5％(35例)對60.0％(24例),97.5％(39例)對70.0％(30例),90.0％(36例)對62.5％(25例),95.0％(38例)對75.0％(30例),92.5％(37例)對70.0％(28例),100.0％(40例)對72.5％(29例),100.0％(40例)對65.0％(26例),差異均有統計學意義(均P＜0.05).結論 CEREC Bluecam數字化印模輔助下的牙體預備質量均優于傳統方法.
목적 탐색자예각람광조상(CEREC Bluecam)수자화인모기술재구강고정교수복아체예비중적응용개치.방법 장행3단위고정교수복적80례환자아체조비후안수궤수자표법분위관찰조화대조조,관찰조40례용자예각람광조상수자화인모진행검사,대조조40례용상규방법검사.용CEREC4.2연건화석고모형대견태관도균균、견태평활련속、견태변연평정、축벽무도요、축면취합도량호、교합공간괄합、공동취위도량호등진행평개.결과 견태관도균균、견태평활련속、견태변연평정、축벽무도요、축면취합도량호、교합공간괄합、공동취위도량호,관찰조화대조조수자화인모평개량호적분별위95.0％(38례)대62.5％(25례),92.5％(37례)대77.5％(31례),97.5％(39례)대75.0％(30례),95.0％(38례)대72.5％(29례),90.0％(36례)대65.0％(26례),100.0％(40례)대52.5％(21례),97.5％(39례)대75.0％(30례),차이균유통계학의의(P＜0.05);이석고모형평개량호적분별위87.5％(35례)대60.0％(24례),97.5％(39례)대70.0％(30례),90.0％(36례)대62.5％(25례),95.0％(38례)대75.0％(30례),92.5％(37례)대70.0％(28례),100.0％(40례)대72.5％(29례),100.0％(40례)대65.0％(26례),차이균유통계학의의(균P＜0.05).결론 CEREC Bluecam수자화인모보조하적아체예비질량균우우전통방법.
Objective To study CEREC Bluecam digital impressions in tooth preparation of fixed bridge.Methods Totally 80 patients of tooth preparation of 3 units fixed bridge were divided into experiment group (with CEREC Bluecam digital impressions system) and control group (with traditional method) randomly,and then captured the CEREC Bluecam digital impressions and made the dental models after the tooth preparation.Shoulders width,smooth and continuation of shoulders,paleness of shoulders edge,axial chamfers,axial converge degree,occlusal space and common path of insertion were analyzed.Results In the digital impressions in the equality of shoulders width,smooth and continuation of shoulders,paleness of shoulders edge,axial chamfers,axial converge degree,occlusal space and common path of insertion,the experiment group was better than control group:95.0％ (38 cases) vs.62.5％ (25 cases),92.5％ (37 cases) vs.77.5％ (31 cases),97.5％ (39 cases) vs.75.0％ (30 cases),95.0％ (38 cases) vs.72.5％ (29 cases),90.0％ (36 cases) vs.65.0％ (26 cases),100.0％ (40 cases) vs.52.5％ (21 cases),and 97.5％ (39 cases)vs.75.0％ (30 cases),respectively,all (P＜0.05).In the dental models,the experiment group was better than control group:87.5％ (35 cases) vs.60.0％ (24 cases),97.5％ (39 cases) vs.75.0％ (30 cases),90.0％ (36 cases) vs 62.5％ (25 cases),95.0％ (38 cases) vs 75.0％(30 cases),92.5％ (37 cases) vs 70.0％ (28 cases),100.0％ (40 cases) vs.72.5％ (29 cases),and 100.0％ (40 cases) vs.65.0％ (26 cases),respectively,(all P＜0.05).Conclusions The tooth preparation quality with the CEREC Bluecam digital impressions is better than that of the traditional method.
