世界最新医学信息文摘（连续型电子期刊）
世界最新醫學信息文摘（連續型電子期刊）
세계최신의학신식문적（련속형전자기간）
World Latest Medicine Information
2015年
73期
1,3
,共2页
腰椎管狭窄症%Dynesys%后路椎间融合
腰椎管狹窄癥%Dynesys%後路椎間融閤
요추관협착증%Dynesys%후로추간융합
lumbar spinal stenosis%Dynesys%posterior lumbar interbody fusion
目的:探讨Dynesys与后路椎间融合在腰椎管狭窄症中的治疗效果.方法:选取2012年8月到2014年5月我院收治的腰椎管狭窄症者85例,并随机分为A组(n=42)和B组(n=43).A组都采用后路椎间融合手术,B组均采用经椎弓根Dynesys手术治疗,对比两组的治疗效果.结果:A组、B组切口长度相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).A组、B组末次随访ODI评分、VAS评分显著比手术前降低(P<0.05),但两组末次随访ODI评分、VAS评分相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:在腰椎管狭窄症治疗中,后路椎间融合手术和经椎弓根Dynesys手术治疗效果相近,但后者具有手术时间短、创伤小和出血量低等特点,可有效地稳定脊柱,值得推广.
目的:探討Dynesys與後路椎間融閤在腰椎管狹窄癥中的治療效果.方法:選取2012年8月到2014年5月我院收治的腰椎管狹窄癥者85例,併隨機分為A組(n=42)和B組(n=43).A組都採用後路椎間融閤手術,B組均採用經椎弓根Dynesys手術治療,對比兩組的治療效果.結果:A組、B組切口長度相比,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).A組、B組末次隨訪ODI評分、VAS評分顯著比手術前降低(P<0.05),但兩組末次隨訪ODI評分、VAS評分相比,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論:在腰椎管狹窄癥治療中,後路椎間融閤手術和經椎弓根Dynesys手術治療效果相近,但後者具有手術時間短、創傷小和齣血量低等特點,可有效地穩定脊柱,值得推廣.
목적:탐토Dynesys여후로추간융합재요추관협착증중적치료효과.방법:선취2012년8월도2014년5월아원수치적요추관협착증자85례,병수궤분위A조(n=42)화B조(n=43).A조도채용후로추간융합수술,B조균채용경추궁근Dynesys수술치료,대비량조적치료효과.결과:A조、B조절구장도상비,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).A조、B조말차수방ODI평분、VAS평분현저비수술전강저(P<0.05),단량조말차수방ODI평분、VAS평분상비,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론:재요추관협착증치료중,후로추간융합수술화경추궁근Dynesys수술치료효과상근,단후자구유수술시간단、창상소화출혈량저등특점,가유효지은정척주,치득추엄.
Objective: To investigate the Dynesys and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in.Methods:a total of August 2012 to 2014 years 5 months in our hospital from lumbar spinal stenosis were 85 cases, and were randomly divided into group A (n = 42) and group B (n = 43). The A group was treated by posterior lumbar interbody fusion, and the B group was treated by pedicle Dynesys operation, and the treatment effect was compared between the two groups. Results: there was no significant difference in the length of the incision in the A group and the B group (P>0.05). ODI score and VAS score were significantly lower in A group and B group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05) and the VAS score at the end of groups (ODI).Conclusion: in lumbar spinal canal stenosis treatment in, posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery and transpedicular Dynesys surgical treatment effect is similar, but the latter has a shorter operation time, less trauma and bleeding quantity low characteristic, can effectively stabilize the spine, and is worthy to be popularized.
