针灸临床杂志
針灸臨床雜誌
침구림상잡지
Journal of Clinical Acupuncture and Moxibustion
2015年
10期
52-55
,共4页
短刺%针刺疗法%神经根型颈椎病
短刺%針刺療法%神經根型頸椎病
단자%침자요법%신경근형경추병
Close needling%Acupuncture%Cervical spondylosis radiculopathy
目的:观察短刺针法治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床疗效. 方法:将70例神经根型颈椎病患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组35例. 对照组给予一般针刺疗法治疗,治疗组给予短刺针法治疗,比较两组病例治疗前后视觉模拟评分( VAS)和颈部残障指数量表( NDI)评分,并进行疗效评定. 结果:两组病例治疗后VAS、NDI评分与治疗前比较,差异具有统计学意义( P<0.01). 治疗组治疗后VAS、NDI评分与对照组比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01 或P<0.05). 1 个疗程结束时,治疗组总有效率为97.1%,对照组为88 .6%,两组比较差异具有统计学意义( P<0 .05 ). 结论:短刺针法能显著改善神经根型颈椎病患者的临床症状,是一种新的有效的治疗方法.
目的:觀察短刺針法治療神經根型頸椎病的臨床療效. 方法:將70例神經根型頸椎病患者隨機分為治療組和對照組,每組35例. 對照組給予一般針刺療法治療,治療組給予短刺針法治療,比較兩組病例治療前後視覺模擬評分( VAS)和頸部殘障指數量錶( NDI)評分,併進行療效評定. 結果:兩組病例治療後VAS、NDI評分與治療前比較,差異具有統計學意義( P<0.01). 治療組治療後VAS、NDI評分與對照組比較,差異具有統計學意義(P<0.01 或P<0.05). 1 箇療程結束時,治療組總有效率為97.1%,對照組為88 .6%,兩組比較差異具有統計學意義( P<0 .05 ). 結論:短刺針法能顯著改善神經根型頸椎病患者的臨床癥狀,是一種新的有效的治療方法.
목적:관찰단자침법치료신경근형경추병적림상료효. 방법:장70례신경근형경추병환자수궤분위치료조화대조조,매조35례. 대조조급여일반침자요법치료,치료조급여단자침법치료,비교량조병례치료전후시각모의평분( VAS)화경부잔장지수량표( NDI)평분,병진행료효평정. 결과:량조병례치료후VAS、NDI평분여치료전비교,차이구유통계학의의( P<0.01). 치료조치료후VAS、NDI평분여대조조비교,차이구유통계학의의(P<0.01 혹P<0.05). 1 개료정결속시,치료조총유효솔위97.1%,대조조위88 .6%,량조비교차이구유통계학의의( P<0 .05 ). 결론:단자침법능현저개선신경근형경추병환자적림상증상,시일충신적유효적치료방법.
Objective:To observe the clinical effect on the treatment of cervical spondylosis radiculopathy by close needling .Methods:Randomly divide 70 patients with cervical spondylosis radiculopathy into a treatment group and a control group ,with 35 cases in each group .Give general acupuncture therapy to treat the control group and close needling to treat the treatment group;compare the scores of visual analogue scale ( VAS) and neck disability index (NDI) of two groups before and after treatment and assess their curative effects .Results:The difference in the scores of VAS and NDI between two groups before and after treatment was of statistical sig -nificance (P<0.01).The difference in the scores of VAS and NDI between the treatment group after treatment and the control group was of statistical significance (P<0.01,P<0.05).After one course of treatment, the total effective rate of the treatment group was 97 .1%and that of control group was 88 .6%, and the comparative difference of two groups is of statistical significance (P<0.05).Conclusion:Close needling can significantly improve the clinical symptoms of patients with cervical spondylosis radiculopathy, so it is a new and effective therapy .