CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨护理人员对2种排班模式的满意度。方法在同一病区对30名护理人员不同时期分别实施 AN(A 指日班,N 指夜班)连续性排班结合周夜班(周夜班组)和 AN 连续性排班结合轮夜班(轮夜班组)各8个月。比较2组护理人员满意度。结果护理人员满意度得分均低于最低标准。周夜班组工作被称赞和认可、福利待遇得分高于轮夜班组,轮夜班组家庭和工作的平衡、排班得分高于周夜班组。结论AN 连续性排班结合周夜班与 AN 连续性排班结合轮夜班的排班模式护理人员满意度均低,2种排班模式各有优势。
목적：탐토호리인원대2충배반모식적만의도。방법재동일병구대30명호리인원불동시기분별실시 AN(A 지일반,N 지야반)련속성배반결합주야반(주야반조)화 AN 련속성배반결합륜야반(륜야반조)각8개월。비교2조호리인원만의도。결과호리인원만의도득분균저우최저표준。주야반조공작피칭찬화인가、복리대우득분고우륜야반조,륜야반조가정화공작적평형、배반득분고우주야반조。결론AN 련속성배반결합주야반여 AN 련속성배반결합륜야반적배반모식호리인원만의도균저,2충배반모식각유우세。
Objective To explore the nurses′satisfaction on two scheduling modes.Methods For 30 nurses from the same ward,group A followed AN continuous shifts (A means work on day shift and N means work on night shift)combined with whole-week night shifts,while group B was on AN continuous shifts with rotating night shifts,both for 8 months.Their satisfaction was compared at the end of the 8 months.Results The mean total satisfaction scores of both groups were low.Group A scored higher in working approral and recognition,along with bonus,while group B did better in balance between work and family and shifting arrangement.Conclusion Both scheduling modes have low satisfaction among nursing staff.But they have their own advantages.