CAJ | 학술논문

目的探讨普胸外科手术在肺挫裂伤修补患者中的临床治疗效果。方法选取2012年4月~2014年4月我院收治的80例肺挫裂伤修补患者资料进行分析，根据不同治疗方案将患者分为对照组和实验组，对照组采用乌司他丁治疗，实验组采用普胸外科手术治疗，比较两组疗效。结果实验组EICU监护时间为（6.8±2.1）d，显著短于对照组（<0.05）；实验组3例发生ARDS，发生率为7.5%，死亡率为0%，显著低于对照组（7例发生ARDS，发生率为17.5%；4例死亡，死亡率为10%）（<0.05）。结论肺挫裂患者采用普通外科手术修复效果理想，能够降低手术创伤，提高临床疗效，值得推广使用。
목적탐토보흉외과수술재폐좌렬상수보환자중적림상치료효과。방법선취2012년4월~2014년4월아원수치적80례폐좌렬상수보환자자료진행분석，근거불동치료방안장환자분위대조조화실험조，대조조채용오사타정치료，실험조채용보흉외과수술치료，비교량조료효。결과실험조EICU감호시간위（6.8±2.1）d，현저단우대조조（<0.05）；실험조3례발생ARDS，발생솔위7.5%，사망솔위0%，현저저우대조조（7례발생ARDS，발생솔위17.5%；4례사망，사망솔위10%）（<0.05）。결론폐좌렬환자채용보통외과수술수복효과이상，능구강저수술창상，제고림상료효，치득추엄사용。
Objective To discuss general thoracic surgeries' Clinical curative ef ect on patients with pulmonary contusion repair.Methods Select materials of 80 patients with pulmonary contusion repair our hospital patients accept Between April 2013 and April 2014, to analyze it . According to the dif erent treatment,we divided the patients into control group and experimental group.The control group treated patients with ulinastatin,and The experimental group used the general thoracic surgery to patients.To compare two groups of curative ef ect.Results The experimental group EICU monitoring time was (6.8±2.1) days,and it is significantly shorter than the control group ( <0.05).The experimental group had 3 cases of ARDS.The incidence was 7.5%, the death rate was 0%.It is Significantly lower than the control group (7 cases of ARDS,The incidence was 17.5%;4 cases of death,The mortality rate of 10%) ( < 0.05).Conclusion Patients with sharp crack to use common surgical repair,its ef ect is ideal.It can reduce surgical trauma and improve clinical curative ef ect, and it is worthy of promotion ot use.