决策与信息(下旬刊)
決策與信息(下旬刊)
결책여신식(하순간)
Decision & Information
2015年
11期
77-77,79
,共2页
生命质量%大学生%独生子
生命質量%大學生%獨生子
생명질량%대학생%독생자
life quality%College students%singleton
目的:比较独生子女和非独生子女大学生生命质量,为其健康教育及预防保健提供相关依据。方法:应用分层抽样的方法抽取取滨州医学院2012级专业学生独生子81名为研究对象,根据年龄、性别、专业和生源地匹配81名非独生子。采用36条目简明健康量表(SF-36)对入选的162名大学生进行调查。结果:在情感职能(RE)方面,独生子的状况要优于非独生子大学生(P<0.05)。结论:大学阶段开展健康教育,对非独生子女应给予更多的关注。
目的:比較獨生子女和非獨生子女大學生生命質量,為其健康教育及預防保健提供相關依據。方法:應用分層抽樣的方法抽取取濱州醫學院2012級專業學生獨生子81名為研究對象,根據年齡、性彆、專業和生源地匹配81名非獨生子。採用36條目簡明健康量錶(SF-36)對入選的162名大學生進行調查。結果:在情感職能(RE)方麵,獨生子的狀況要優于非獨生子大學生(P<0.05)。結論:大學階段開展健康教育,對非獨生子女應給予更多的關註。
목적:비교독생자녀화비독생자녀대학생생명질량,위기건강교육급예방보건제공상관의거。방법:응용분층추양적방법추취취빈주의학원2012급전업학생독생자81명위연구대상,근거년령、성별、전업화생원지필배81명비독생자。채용36조목간명건강량표(SF-36)대입선적162명대학생진행조사。결과:재정감직능(RE)방면,독생자적상황요우우비독생자대학생(P<0.05)。결론:대학계단개전건강교육,대비독생자녀응급여경다적관주。
Objective To compare the life of quality singleton and non-singleton college students, and to provide evidences for health education and preventive care. Methods Taking stratified sampling method 81 students college students from the class of 2012 Binzhou Medical University were investigated as singleton college students by 36 items concise health scale (SF - 36), the age, sex,specialty and address of non-singleton college students were same with singleton college students. Results The RE score of singleton college students was better than non-singleton college students (P < 0.05). Conclusion, non-singleton college students should be given more attention on health education in college.