世界桥梁
世界橋樑
세계교량
World Bridges
2015年
6期
58-62
,共5页
邵亚会%赵心悦%侯俊勇%汪莲
邵亞會%趙心悅%侯俊勇%汪蓮
소아회%조심열%후준용%왕련
桥梁设计%标准规范%中小跨度桥梁%车道荷载%荷载组合%配筋设计
橋樑設計%標準規範%中小跨度橋樑%車道荷載%荷載組閤%配觔設計
교량설계%표준규범%중소과도교량%차도하재%하재조합%배근설계
bridge design%standard specification%small and medium-sized span bridge%traffic lane load%load combination%reinforcement design
2015年新实施的《公路工程技术标准》(JTG B01-2014)将公路-Ⅰ级车道荷载集中荷载标准值由180~360 kN增加到270~360 kN。为指导新标准下桥梁设计,以13,16,20,25,30 m标准跨径的预应力混凝土T形简支梁桥为研究对象,对比分析车道荷载增加后边梁和中梁跨中活载弯矩、作用基本组合值、作用短期组合值、作用长期组合值的变化;对边梁和中梁预应力钢绞线和受拉区普通钢筋进行对比计算,给出新荷载标准下需增加的配束要求。研究表明:活载引起的边梁跨中弯矩最大增幅为27%;作用基本组合、短期组合、长期组合的最大增幅分别为22%、18%和14%。新标准下所需的预应力钢束和普通受拉钢筋数目均增大,5种跨径下单片边梁分别增配φs 15.2预应力钢绞线3束、3束、2束、1束、1束,受拉区普通钢筋分别增配2根φ22、3根φ22、1根φ25、1根φ25和0根φ25;单片中梁分别增配φs 15.2预应力钢绞线2束、2束、2束、1束、1束,受拉区普通钢筋分别增配3根φ22、2根φ22、0根φ25、0根φ25和0根φ25。
2015年新實施的《公路工程技術標準》(JTG B01-2014)將公路-Ⅰ級車道荷載集中荷載標準值由180~360 kN增加到270~360 kN。為指導新標準下橋樑設計,以13,16,20,25,30 m標準跨徑的預應力混凝土T形簡支樑橋為研究對象,對比分析車道荷載增加後邊樑和中樑跨中活載彎矩、作用基本組閤值、作用短期組閤值、作用長期組閤值的變化;對邊樑和中樑預應力鋼絞線和受拉區普通鋼觔進行對比計算,給齣新荷載標準下需增加的配束要求。研究錶明:活載引起的邊樑跨中彎矩最大增幅為27%;作用基本組閤、短期組閤、長期組閤的最大增幅分彆為22%、18%和14%。新標準下所需的預應力鋼束和普通受拉鋼觔數目均增大,5種跨徑下單片邊樑分彆增配φs 15.2預應力鋼絞線3束、3束、2束、1束、1束,受拉區普通鋼觔分彆增配2根φ22、3根φ22、1根φ25、1根φ25和0根φ25;單片中樑分彆增配φs 15.2預應力鋼絞線2束、2束、2束、1束、1束,受拉區普通鋼觔分彆增配3根φ22、2根φ22、0根φ25、0根φ25和0根φ25。
2015년신실시적《공로공정기술표준》(JTG B01-2014)장공로-Ⅰ급차도하재집중하재표준치유180~360 kN증가도270~360 kN。위지도신표준하교량설계,이13,16,20,25,30 m표준과경적예응력혼응토T형간지량교위연구대상,대비분석차도하재증가후변량화중량과중활재만구、작용기본조합치、작용단기조합치、작용장기조합치적변화;대변량화중량예응력강교선화수랍구보통강근진행대비계산,급출신하재표준하수증가적배속요구。연구표명:활재인기적변량과중만구최대증폭위27%;작용기본조합、단기조합、장기조합적최대증폭분별위22%、18%화14%。신표준하소수적예응력강속화보통수랍강근수목균증대,5충과경하단편변량분별증배φs 15.2예응력강교선3속、3속、2속、1속、1속,수랍구보통강근분별증배2근φ22、3근φ22、1근φ25、1근φ25화0근φ25;단편중량분별증배φs 15.2예응력강교선2속、2속、2속、1속、1속,수랍구보통강근분별증배3근φ22、2근φ22、0근φ25、0근φ25화0근φ25。
In the new Technical Standard of Highway Engineering (JTG B01‐2014)which goes into effect in 2015 ,the standard range for eccentric load of Grade Ⅰ traffic lane load is increased from 180~360 kN to 270~360 kN .To guide the bridge design under new standard ,the simply‐supported prestressed concrete T beam bridges with spans of 13 ,16 ,20 ,25 ,30 m respectively were taken as the study objects ,to comparatively analyze the load variation of side spans and the central span ,including the midspan deflection induced by live load ,the basic combined load value , the short‐term combined load value and the long‐term combined load value under the action .The amount of prestressed steel strands in the side spans and the central span and that of the common reinforcement in the tensile area were calculated and compared ,and the amount of reinforcement that should be added under the new load standard was suggested .The results of the study indicate that the midspan deflection in the side spans induced by live load is increased by 27% at maximum , and 22% ,18% and 14% at maximum under the action of basic combined load ,short‐term com‐bined load and long‐term combined load ,respectively .In the new technical standard ,the pres‐tressed steel strands and common tensile reinforcement required are all increased .In the beams with the aforementioned five span lengths ,the number of the φs15 .2 prestressed concrete steel strands added to a single side span beam are 3 ,3 ,2 ,1 ,1 ,w hile the amount of common reinforce‐ment added to the tensile areas are two reinforcement of 22 mm diameter ,three of 22 mm diame‐ter ,one of 25 mm diameter ,one of 25 mm diameter and none of 25 mm .In a single central beam , the number of the φs15 .2 prestressed steel strands added under the five span lengths are 2 ,2 ,2 , 1 ,1 ,w hile the common reinforcement added to the tensile area are three reinforcement of 22 mm , two of 22 mm ,zero of 25 mm ,zero of 25 mm and zero of 25 mm .