现代中西医结合杂志
現代中西醫結閤雜誌
현대중서의결합잡지
Modern Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine
2015年
35期
3902-3904
,共3页
何洪雨%刘华新%杨志强%于帅%匡虎松
何洪雨%劉華新%楊誌彊%于帥%劻虎鬆
하홍우%류화신%양지강%우수%광호송
小骨窗开颅%脑出血%脑室铸型%脑室外引流
小骨窗開顱%腦齣血%腦室鑄型%腦室外引流
소골창개로%뇌출혈%뇌실주형%뇌실외인류
small bone window craniotomy%cerebral hemorrhage%interventricular hemorrhage cast%external ventricular drainage
目的:观察小骨窗开颅经额叶入路脑室内血肿清除术治疗侧脑室出血并铸型的效果。方法将90例侧脑室内出血并铸型的患者随机分为2组,观察组45例行小骨窗开颅经额入路脑室内血肿清除术,对照组45例行单纯侧脑室外引流术。术后随访3~6个月,按照格拉斯哥预后评分( GOS)评价2组临床疗效。结果观察组脑室内引流管留置时间及住院时间均明显短于对照组(P均<0.05)。观察组恢复良好率明显高于对照组(P均<0.05),病死率及颅内感染、脑脊液漏发生率明显低于对照组(P均<0.05)。结论小骨窗开颅经额入路脑室内血肿清除术治疗脑室出血并铸型疗效明显优于单纯侧脑室外引流术。
目的:觀察小骨窗開顱經額葉入路腦室內血腫清除術治療側腦室齣血併鑄型的效果。方法將90例側腦室內齣血併鑄型的患者隨機分為2組,觀察組45例行小骨窗開顱經額入路腦室內血腫清除術,對照組45例行單純側腦室外引流術。術後隨訪3~6箇月,按照格拉斯哥預後評分( GOS)評價2組臨床療效。結果觀察組腦室內引流管留置時間及住院時間均明顯短于對照組(P均<0.05)。觀察組恢複良好率明顯高于對照組(P均<0.05),病死率及顱內感染、腦脊液漏髮生率明顯低于對照組(P均<0.05)。結論小骨窗開顱經額入路腦室內血腫清除術治療腦室齣血併鑄型療效明顯優于單純側腦室外引流術。
목적:관찰소골창개로경액협입로뇌실내혈종청제술치료측뇌실출혈병주형적효과。방법장90례측뇌실내출혈병주형적환자수궤분위2조,관찰조45례행소골창개로경액입로뇌실내혈종청제술,대조조45례행단순측뇌실외인류술。술후수방3~6개월,안조격랍사가예후평분( GOS)평개2조림상료효。결과관찰조뇌실내인류관류치시간급주원시간균명현단우대조조(P균<0.05)。관찰조회복량호솔명현고우대조조(P균<0.05),병사솔급로내감염、뇌척액루발생솔명현저우대조조(P균<0.05)。결론소골창개로경액입로뇌실내혈종청제술치료뇌실출혈병주형료효명현우우단순측뇌실외인류술。
Objective It is to observe the effect of surgical method of microsurgery through frontal lobe small bone window craniotomy approach on intraventricular hematoma and interventricular hemorrhage cast .Methods 90 patients with intravent-ricular hematoma and interventricular hemorrhage cast were randomly divided into 2 groups.The group (45cases) using the method of microsurgery treatment through frontal lobe small bone window approach was treated as observation group while the group (45 cases)using the method of simply external ventricular drainage approach was treated as control group .The curative effects were compared 3-6 months postoperatively according Glasgow outcome score .Results The retention time of intravent-ricular tube and hospitalization time in observation group were obviously shorter than that in control group (P<0.05).The good recovery rate in observation group was obviously higher than that in control group (P<0.05).The death rate, and oc-currence rates of intracranial infection and cerebrospinal fluid leak in observation group were obviously lower than that in con -trol group(P all<0.05).The differences were statistical significance (P<0.05).Conclusion The surgical method of micro-surgery through frontal lobe small bone window craniotomy approach on intraventricular hematoma and interventricular hemor -rhage cast is obviously better than that through simply external ventricular drainage approach .