东北大学学报(社会科学版)
東北大學學報(社會科學版)
동북대학학보(사회과학판)
Journal of Northeastern University (Social Science)
2015年
6期
606-612
,共7页
农村低保%政策执行变异%合谋行为%庇护制%博弈机制
農村低保%政策執行變異%閤謀行為%庇護製%博弈機製
농촌저보%정책집행변이%합모행위%비호제%박혁궤제
rural subsistence allowance%policy implementation alienation%collusion behavior%patron system%game mechanism
学界普遍将低保执行中的“关系保”和“人情保”等政策变异视为在后税费时代的乡村治理手段。在鲁中 C 镇农村低保执行的个案中深度阐述了另一种类型的变异:村干部通过提示促使低保户在获得低保名额的同时,需要上交一部分低保金作为交换条件。低保自身的制度缺陷为此种合谋行为的产生提供了可能性。村干部通过建立庇护制来对村民进行操作,村民在此基础上通过理性博弈,进而选择上交的策略让自己适当获利,最终形成了双方的合谋。通过对当今的庇护制与集体化时期的庇护制进行比较,指出低保公示制度有利于消解“合谋”行为的发生。
學界普遍將低保執行中的“關繫保”和“人情保”等政策變異視為在後稅費時代的鄉村治理手段。在魯中 C 鎮農村低保執行的箇案中深度闡述瞭另一種類型的變異:村榦部通過提示促使低保戶在穫得低保名額的同時,需要上交一部分低保金作為交換條件。低保自身的製度缺陷為此種閤謀行為的產生提供瞭可能性。村榦部通過建立庇護製來對村民進行操作,村民在此基礎上通過理性博弈,進而選擇上交的策略讓自己適噹穫利,最終形成瞭雙方的閤謀。通過對噹今的庇護製與集體化時期的庇護製進行比較,指齣低保公示製度有利于消解“閤謀”行為的髮生。
학계보편장저보집행중적“관계보”화“인정보”등정책변이시위재후세비시대적향촌치리수단。재로중 C 진농촌저보집행적개안중심도천술료령일충류형적변이:촌간부통과제시촉사저보호재획득저보명액적동시,수요상교일부분저보금작위교환조건。저보자신적제도결함위차충합모행위적산생제공료가능성。촌간부통과건립비호제래대촌민진행조작,촌민재차기출상통과이성박혁,진이선택상교적책략양자기괄당획리,최종형성료쌍방적합모。통과대당금적비호제여집체화시기적비호제진행비교,지출저보공시제도유리우소해“합모”행위적발생。
GuanxiBao and RenqingBao in implementing rural subsistence allowances are viewed as rural governance tolls by most scholars after the tax reform.However, another sort of policy implementation variation is revealed through the case study of rural subsistence allowances in C Town,Shandong Province,where many village cadres tend to prompt the low-income families that if they want to receive subsistence allowances from the government they should return some subsidies to the cadres as an exchange reward.The inherent defect of subsistence allowances offers the possibility of such collusion.By establishing the patron system,village cadres can easily manipulate the low-income recipients.In turn,villagers can also game and choose a preferred delivery strategy for more profit.As a result the two sides may reach collusion.Finally,the current patron system and that in the collectivization period is compared,which indicates that the subsistence allowance publicity system helps to resolve the emergence of collusion.