磁共振成像
磁共振成像
자공진성상
Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
2015年
11期
843-847
,共5页
黄耀渠%赵晓梅%伍琼惠%秦红卫
黃耀渠%趙曉梅%伍瓊惠%秦紅衛
황요거%조효매%오경혜%진홍위
椎间盘退化%颈椎病%磁共振成像
椎間盤退化%頸椎病%磁共振成像
추간반퇴화%경추병%자공진성상
Intervertebral disc degeneration%Cervical spondylosis%Magnetic resonance imaging
目的:探讨MRI测量T2弛豫时间定量评估颈椎间盘退变及年龄、节段相关变化的价值。材料与方法40名健康受试者进行了颈椎常规MRI和T2-mapping检查。对椎间盘进行Pfirrmann分级,并测量髓核的T2弛豫时间值(T2值)。结果颈椎间盘髓核T2值与Pfirrmann分级负相关(r=-0.64,P<0.01)。不同Pfirrmann分级椎间盘的髓核T2值差异有统计学意义(F=48.2,P<0.01),各级间两两比较T2值差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。T2值鉴别Ⅰ级与Ⅱ级、Ⅱ级与Ⅲ级、Ⅲ级与Ⅳ级椎间盘的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.79、0.81和0.78(P<0.05)。18~30岁组髓核T2值大于31~40岁组(P<0.05)。18~30岁组不同解剖节段的髓核T2值差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);而31~40岁组不同解剖节段的髓核T2值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 MRI测量T2弛豫时间值能量化评估颈椎间盘退变及其年龄、解剖节段相关变化,具有一定的临床价值,应作为评估颈椎间盘退变的补充序列。
目的:探討MRI測量T2弛豫時間定量評估頸椎間盤退變及年齡、節段相關變化的價值。材料與方法40名健康受試者進行瞭頸椎常規MRI和T2-mapping檢查。對椎間盤進行Pfirrmann分級,併測量髓覈的T2弛豫時間值(T2值)。結果頸椎間盤髓覈T2值與Pfirrmann分級負相關(r=-0.64,P<0.01)。不同Pfirrmann分級椎間盤的髓覈T2值差異有統計學意義(F=48.2,P<0.01),各級間兩兩比較T2值差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)。T2值鑒彆Ⅰ級與Ⅱ級、Ⅱ級與Ⅲ級、Ⅲ級與Ⅳ級椎間盤的ROC麯線下麵積分彆為0.79、0.81和0.78(P<0.05)。18~30歲組髓覈T2值大于31~40歲組(P<0.05)。18~30歲組不同解剖節段的髓覈T2值差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);而31~40歲組不同解剖節段的髓覈T2值差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論 MRI測量T2弛豫時間值能量化評估頸椎間盤退變及其年齡、解剖節段相關變化,具有一定的臨床價值,應作為評估頸椎間盤退變的補充序列。
목적:탐토MRI측량T2이예시간정량평고경추간반퇴변급년령、절단상관변화적개치。재료여방법40명건강수시자진행료경추상규MRI화T2-mapping검사。대추간반진행Pfirrmann분급,병측량수핵적T2이예시간치(T2치)。결과경추간반수핵T2치여Pfirrmann분급부상관(r=-0.64,P<0.01)。불동Pfirrmann분급추간반적수핵T2치차이유통계학의의(F=48.2,P<0.01),각급간량량비교T2치차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05)。T2치감별Ⅰ급여Ⅱ급、Ⅱ급여Ⅲ급、Ⅲ급여Ⅳ급추간반적ROC곡선하면적분별위0.79、0.81화0.78(P<0.05)。18~30세조수핵T2치대우31~40세조(P<0.05)。18~30세조불동해부절단적수핵T2치차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);이31~40세조불동해부절단적수핵T2치차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론 MRI측량T2이예시간치능양화평고경추간반퇴변급기년령、해부절단상관변화,구유일정적림상개치,응작위평고경추간반퇴변적보충서렬。
Abrtract Objective: To explore the value of T2 relaxation time (T2 value) measurement in detecting cervical intervertebral disc degeneration, and assessing age and disc level related intervertebral disc changes. Materials and Methods: Forty asymptomatic adult volunteers were examined at 1.5 T MR by T2-weighted sagittal imaging and T2-mapping. For all participants, Pfirrmann grading system and T2 value were used to evaluate the degenerative degree of the disks. Results:Signiifcant negative correlation were observed between Pifrrmann grades and T2 values of cervical intervertebral disc (r=-0.64, P<0.01). ANOVA (analysis of variance) among different Pfirrmann grades showed significant differences in T2 values (F=48.2,P<0.01), and signiifcant differences were seen between any 2 grades (P<0.05). The area under ROC curve of T2 value were 0.79, 0.81 and 0.78 (P<0.05) separately when gradeⅠvs.Ⅱ,Ⅱvs.Ⅲ, andⅢvs.Ⅳ. T2 values of 18—30 age group were higher than 31—40 age group participants (P<0.05). Signiifcant differences among different disc level were observed in 18—30 age group (P<0.05). However, in 31—40 age group, no significant differences of disc level were demonstrated (P>0.05). Conclusions:T2 relaxation time measurement is a quantitative-parameter for assessing cervical intervertebral disc degeneration and age and disc level related disc changes, and shall be used as a complementary sequence in detecting cervical disc degeneration for its certain clinical value.