上海大学学报(社会科学版)
上海大學學報(社會科學版)
상해대학학보(사회과학판)
Journal of Shanghai University (Social Science Edition)
2015年
6期
83-92
,共10页
高技术产业%自主研发%引进技术%更新改造%绩效
高技術產業%自主研髮%引進技術%更新改造%績效
고기술산업%자주연발%인진기술%경신개조%적효
high-tech industry%enterprises' self R&D input%introducing technology%equipment upgra-ding and transformation%performance
绩效是创新路径选择的重要依据,利用高技术产业省际面板数据,采用系统广义矩估计与分位数回归方法,研究企业自主研发、引进国外技术、引进国内技术、更新改造四种不同途径科技投入对创新产出的贡献. 结果表明:企业自主研发投入贡献最大,引进国外技术投入次之,更新改造投入贡献最小. 高技术企业自主研发投入与引进国外技术的结合较好. 引进国内技术投入对最高科研产出水平地区的贡献比较显著,研发人员全时当量的贡献总体较低,并且随着科技产出的提高,其贡献越来越低,说明高科研产出地区研发人员的绩效较低.
績效是創新路徑選擇的重要依據,利用高技術產業省際麵闆數據,採用繫統廣義矩估計與分位數迴歸方法,研究企業自主研髮、引進國外技術、引進國內技術、更新改造四種不同途徑科技投入對創新產齣的貢獻. 結果錶明:企業自主研髮投入貢獻最大,引進國外技術投入次之,更新改造投入貢獻最小. 高技術企業自主研髮投入與引進國外技術的結閤較好. 引進國內技術投入對最高科研產齣水平地區的貢獻比較顯著,研髮人員全時噹量的貢獻總體較低,併且隨著科技產齣的提高,其貢獻越來越低,說明高科研產齣地區研髮人員的績效較低.
적효시창신로경선택적중요의거,이용고기술산업성제면판수거,채용계통엄의구고계여분위수회귀방법,연구기업자주연발、인진국외기술、인진국내기술、경신개조사충불동도경과기투입대창신산출적공헌. 결과표명:기업자주연발투입공헌최대,인진국외기술투입차지,경신개조투입공헌최소. 고기술기업자주연발투입여인진국외기술적결합교호. 인진국내기술투입대최고과연산출수평지구적공헌비교현저,연발인원전시당량적공헌총체교저,병차수착과기산출적제고,기공헌월래월저,설명고과연산출지구연발인원적적효교저.
Performance is an important gauge of the channels of innovation. Based on panel data of pro-vincial high-tech industry, this paper analyzes the contributions of four channels of scientific and technological input to innovation output, namely, enterprises' self R&D input, the import of foreign technology, the intro-duction of domestic technologies and equipment upgrading and transformation by using Sys-GMM and Quantile Regression Models. The results show enterprises' self R&D input yields highest contribution, the import of for-eign technology ranks the second, while equipment upgrading and transformation ranks the last. The combina-tion of self R&D input with foreign technology importing yields better results in those enterprises with high tech-nologies. The introduction of domestic technologies makes significant contribution in those areas with the high-est level of scientific and technological output while the overall contribution of R&D staff is comparatively low and turns out to be worse with the increase of scientific and technological output, indicating comparatively poor performance of R& D staff in those areas with high level of scientific and technological output.