山地农业生物学报
山地農業生物學報
산지농업생물학보
Journal of Mountain Agriculture and Biology
2015年
4期
39-42
,共4页
杨再学%雷邦海%潘世昌%潘会%周显明
楊再學%雷邦海%潘世昌%潘會%週顯明
양재학%뢰방해%반세창%반회%주현명
(贵州省)大足鼠%年龄鉴定%划分标准%繁殖变化
(貴州省)大足鼠%年齡鑒定%劃分標準%繁殖變化
(귀주성)대족서%년령감정%화분표준%번식변화
Rattus nitidus%Age identification%Division criterion%Reproduction fluctuation%Guizhou Provinc
为准确地鉴定大足鼠的年龄,制订适合贵州省大足鼠种群年龄鉴定的体重划分标准.对贵州省岑巩县、息烽县、关岭县1984~2014年采集的57 只大足鼠体重进行统计分析,结果表明:大足鼠平均体重为(107.82 ± 38.86) g,根据体重的频次分配特征,结合雌、雄鼠的繁殖情况,将大足鼠年龄划分为5个年龄组,确定各年龄组的体重划分标准为:幼年组(Ⅰ):体重小于或等于45.0 g,亚成年组(Ⅱ):体重45.1~85.0 g,成年Ⅰ组(Ⅲ):体重85.1~125.0 g,成年Ⅱ组(Ⅳ):体重125.1~165.0 g,老年组(Ⅴ):体重大于165.0 g.大足鼠不同年龄组体重、体长、尾长、后足长、耳长差异显著,且随着年龄的增长而不断增加.不同年龄组种群繁殖力存在显著差异,成年Ⅰ组、成年Ⅱ组为繁殖的主要群体.
為準確地鑒定大足鼠的年齡,製訂適閤貴州省大足鼠種群年齡鑒定的體重劃分標準.對貴州省岑鞏縣、息烽縣、關嶺縣1984~2014年採集的57 隻大足鼠體重進行統計分析,結果錶明:大足鼠平均體重為(107.82 ± 38.86) g,根據體重的頻次分配特徵,結閤雌、雄鼠的繁殖情況,將大足鼠年齡劃分為5箇年齡組,確定各年齡組的體重劃分標準為:幼年組(Ⅰ):體重小于或等于45.0 g,亞成年組(Ⅱ):體重45.1~85.0 g,成年Ⅰ組(Ⅲ):體重85.1~125.0 g,成年Ⅱ組(Ⅳ):體重125.1~165.0 g,老年組(Ⅴ):體重大于165.0 g.大足鼠不同年齡組體重、體長、尾長、後足長、耳長差異顯著,且隨著年齡的增長而不斷增加.不同年齡組種群繁殖力存在顯著差異,成年Ⅰ組、成年Ⅱ組為繁殖的主要群體.
위준학지감정대족서적년령,제정괄합귀주성대족서충군년령감정적체중화분표준.대귀주성잠공현、식봉현、관령현1984~2014년채집적57 지대족서체중진행통계분석,결과표명:대족서평균체중위(107.82 ± 38.86) g,근거체중적빈차분배특정,결합자、웅서적번식정황,장대족서년령화분위5개년령조,학정각년령조적체중화분표준위:유년조(Ⅰ):체중소우혹등우45.0 g,아성년조(Ⅱ):체중45.1~85.0 g,성년Ⅰ조(Ⅲ):체중85.1~125.0 g,성년Ⅱ조(Ⅳ):체중125.1~165.0 g,노년조(Ⅴ):체중대우165.0 g.대족서불동년령조체중、체장、미장、후족장、이장차이현저,차수착년령적증장이불단증가.불동년령조충군번식력존재현저차이,성년Ⅰ조、성년Ⅱ조위번식적주요군체.
In order to establish weight division criterion for age identification of Rattus nitidus. We did statistical a-nalysis on weight of these 57 Rattus nitidus which were captured in Cengong County, Xifeng County and Guanling County in Guizhou province from 1984 to 2014. The results showed that the average weight of Rattus nitidus aver-age weight was (107. 82 ± 38. 86)Guizhoug. According to the frequency distribution characteristics of weight, with reference to the reproductive condition, Rattus nitidus was divided into five age groups. We established the weight division criterion for each age group:youth group (Ⅰ) was less than 45. 0Guizhoug, sub-adult group(Ⅱ) was 45. 1~85. 0Guizhoug, adult group I (Ⅲ) was 85. 1~125. 0Guizhoug, adult group II (Ⅳ) was 125. 1~165. 0Guizhoug and old group (Ⅴ) was more than 165. 0Guizhoug. There was significant difference on weight between different age groups. With the growth of population age, weight increased continuously. Furthermore, there was significant difference on reproduction capacity between different age groups. Adult group I and adult group II were the main reproductive contributors.