中国医学创新
中國醫學創新
중국의학창신
Medical Innovation of China
2015年
31期
132-133
,共2页
体温变化%麻醉苏醒时间%拔管时间%不良反应率%回顾性分析
體溫變化%痳醉囌醒時間%拔管時間%不良反應率%迴顧性分析
체온변화%마취소성시간%발관시간%불량반응솔%회고성분석
Body temperature changes%Anesthesia recovery time%Extubation time%Adverse reaction rate%Retrospective study
目的：分析和探讨外科临床上全麻手术治疗患者体温变化对于麻醉后苏醒及拔管时间的影响。方法：选择本院2014年3月-2015年3月收治的106例全麻情况下手术治疗患者，采用随机数表法分成常规处理组和手术保温组，分别给予常规处理及保温手术治疗，测定两组患者术后平均鼻咽温度。结果：保温手术组患者术中鼻咽温度、平均体温高于常规处理组，保温手术组麻醉苏醒时间以及拔管时间短于常规处理组，比较差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。手术保温组患者术后不良反应率3.77%（2例），低于常规处理组的18.87%（10例），比较差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论：实施全身麻醉患者的临床手术操作可以显著提高体温，缩短术后麻醉恢复时间和拔管时间，减少术后不良反应率，值得临床应用。
目的：分析和探討外科臨床上全痳手術治療患者體溫變化對于痳醉後囌醒及拔管時間的影響。方法：選擇本院2014年3月-2015年3月收治的106例全痳情況下手術治療患者，採用隨機數錶法分成常規處理組和手術保溫組，分彆給予常規處理及保溫手術治療，測定兩組患者術後平均鼻嚥溫度。結果：保溫手術組患者術中鼻嚥溫度、平均體溫高于常規處理組，保溫手術組痳醉囌醒時間以及拔管時間短于常規處理組，比較差異均有統計學意義（P<0.05）。手術保溫組患者術後不良反應率3.77%（2例），低于常規處理組的18.87%（10例），比較差異有統計學意義（P<0.05）。結論：實施全身痳醉患者的臨床手術操作可以顯著提高體溫，縮短術後痳醉恢複時間和拔管時間，減少術後不良反應率，值得臨床應用。
목적：분석화탐토외과림상상전마수술치료환자체온변화대우마취후소성급발관시간적영향。방법：선택본원2014년3월-2015년3월수치적106례전마정황하수술치료환자，채용수궤수표법분성상규처리조화수술보온조，분별급여상규처리급보온수술치료，측정량조환자술후평균비인온도。결과：보온수술조환자술중비인온도、평균체온고우상규처리조，보온수술조마취소성시간이급발관시간단우상규처리조，비교차이균유통계학의의（P<0.05）。수술보온조환자술후불량반응솔3.77%（2례），저우상규처리조적18.87%（10례），비교차이유통계학의의（P<0.05）。결론：실시전신마취환자적림상수술조작가이현저제고체온，축단술후마취회복시간화발관시간，감소술후불량반응솔，치득림상응용。
Objective:To analyze and discuss the surgical clinical anesthesia surgery patients position changes for the influence of awakening and extubation time after anesthesia.Method: From March 2014 to March 2015, 106 patients who underwent general anesthesia surgical treatment, were average divided into conventional treatment group and heat preservation surgery group, insulation were given conventional treatment and surgical treatment, average nasopharyngeal temperature after treatment was tested.Result: The average average nasopharyngeal temperature, mean body temperature of the heat preservation surgery group was higher than that of the conventional treatment group, and recovery time of anesthesia and extubation time was lower, with significant differences (P<0.05). Adverse reaction rate of the heat preservation surgery group was 3.77% (2 cases), which was lower than 18.87 (10 cases ) of the conventional treatment group, with significant differences (P<0.05).Conclusion:Implementation of clinical surgery in patients with general anesthesia operation can significantly improve the insulation body temperature of patients during operation, shorten the postoperative anesthesia recovery time and extubation time, reduce the adverse reaction rate after operation, so it is worthy of clinical use.
