护理研究
護理研究
호리연구
Chinese Nursing Research
2015年
34期
4249-4253
,共5页
邵頔%高庆岭%郭伟%李洁%龙周婷%薛娇美%曹枫林
邵頔%高慶嶺%郭偉%李潔%龍週婷%薛嬌美%曹楓林
소적%고경령%곽위%리길%룡주정%설교미%조풍림
心理测量学%简化应对问卷%信度%效度%应对
心理測量學%簡化應對問捲%信度%效度%應對
심리측량학%간화응대문권%신도%효도%응대
psychometrics%brief COPE%reliability%validity%coping
[目的]考察简化应对问卷(Brief COPE)中文版在经历爆炸事件青少年中的信度和效度。[方法]采用方便抽样的方法,选取经历某市输油管爆炸事件的两所中学的初一、初二年级全体学生655名,进行简化应对问卷的信度和效度分析。选取108名学生进行间隔4周的重测,评定重测信度。[结果]探索性因子分析共提取出7个因子,解释变异量的62.60%;验证性因子分析的拟合指标χ2/df 、近似误差均方根(RMSEA)、拟合优度指数(GFI)、塔克刘易斯指数(Tacker Lewis index,TLI)、比较拟合指数(CFI)值分别为2.75,0.07,0.83,0.82,0.85;Cronbach’s α系数为0.52~0.84;重测信度为0.48~0.71。[结论]简化应对问卷中文版的信度和效度均较理想,符合心理计量学要求,可以满足今后国内有关研究和临床应用的需要。
[目的]攷察簡化應對問捲(Brief COPE)中文版在經歷爆炸事件青少年中的信度和效度。[方法]採用方便抽樣的方法,選取經歷某市輸油管爆炸事件的兩所中學的初一、初二年級全體學生655名,進行簡化應對問捲的信度和效度分析。選取108名學生進行間隔4週的重測,評定重測信度。[結果]探索性因子分析共提取齣7箇因子,解釋變異量的62.60%;驗證性因子分析的擬閤指標χ2/df 、近似誤差均方根(RMSEA)、擬閤優度指數(GFI)、塔剋劉易斯指數(Tacker Lewis index,TLI)、比較擬閤指數(CFI)值分彆為2.75,0.07,0.83,0.82,0.85;Cronbach’s α繫數為0.52~0.84;重測信度為0.48~0.71。[結論]簡化應對問捲中文版的信度和效度均較理想,符閤心理計量學要求,可以滿足今後國內有關研究和臨床應用的需要。
[목적]고찰간화응대문권(Brief COPE)중문판재경력폭작사건청소년중적신도화효도。[방법]채용방편추양적방법,선취경력모시수유관폭작사건적량소중학적초일、초이년급전체학생655명,진행간화응대문권적신도화효도분석。선취108명학생진행간격4주적중측,평정중측신도。[결과]탐색성인자분석공제취출7개인자,해석변이량적62.60%;험증성인자분석적의합지표χ2/df 、근사오차균방근(RMSEA)、의합우도지수(GFI)、탑극류역사지수(Tacker Lewis index,TLI)、비교의합지수(CFI)치분별위2.75,0.07,0.83,0.82,0.85;Cronbach’s α계수위0.52~0.84;중측신도위0.48~0.71。[결론]간화응대문권중문판적신도화효도균교이상,부합심리계량학요구,가이만족금후국내유관연구화림상응용적수요。
Objective:To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Brief COPE in adolescents experienced explosion.Methods:A total of 655 students in grade one and grade two from two junior schools who experienced pipeline explosion were selected to complete the analysis of reliability and validity of Brief COPE by using convenience sampling method.108 students were selected to finish resurvey of Brief COPE for 4 weeks later for assessing the retest reliability.Results:7 factors were extracted as exploratory factor analysis and they explained 62.60% of variance.the fit indexes includingχ2/df ,RMSEA,Goodness of Fit(GFI),TLI,CFI in con-firmatory factor analysis were respectively 2.75,0.07,0.83,0.82,0.85.The Cronbach’s αranged from 0.52 to 0.84,and the retest reliability ranged from 0.48 to 0.71.Conclusion:Both reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Brief COPE were more ideal,they conformed to the requirements of the psychometrics and can meet the needs of the relevant research and clinical application in the future in China.