中国心理卫生杂志
中國心理衛生雜誌
중국심리위생잡지
Chinese Mental Health Journal
2015年
11期
843-847
,共5页
陈玉霞%杨升平%戴育红%孟宪璋
陳玉霞%楊升平%戴育紅%孟憲璋
진옥하%양승평%대육홍%맹헌장
儿童%拒绝上学行为%效度%信度%心理测量学
兒童%拒絕上學行為%效度%信度%心理測量學
인동%거절상학행위%효도%신도%심리측량학
child%school refusal behavior%validity%reliability%psychometrics
目的：编制适用于我国儿童的拒绝上学行为问卷（SRBQC）并检验其效度和信度。方法：在文献检索、访谈、开放式问卷的基础上形成初始条目，选取中小学学生573人试测并形成正式问卷。选取中小学学生946人施测正式问卷，用于进行结构效度及内部一致性信度检验；以儿童社交焦虑量表（SASC）为效标检验效标效度；2周后，随机选取其中41人进行重测，检验重测信度。结果：问卷包括19个条目，分为违抗行为、学校疏离、负性情绪、学习能力、躯体感受5个因子，共解释59.793％的方差变异；验证性因素分析结果表明模型拟合较好（χ2＝329.51，df＝142，χ2／df＝2.32，CFI＝0.97，GFI＝0.93， IFI＝0.97，NFI＝0.95，NNFI＝0.96，RMSEA＝0.05，SRMR＝0.05）；问卷总分及各维度得分均与SASC得分呈正相关（r＝0.18～0.34，P＜0.01或0.05）。总问卷的Cronbach α系数为0.87，各维度的系数在0.55～0.78；总问卷的重测信度为0.84，各维度的重测信度在0.66～0.78。结论：本研究编制的儿童拒绝上学行为问卷符合心理测量学要求，可用于我国儿童拒绝上学行为的评估。
目的：編製適用于我國兒童的拒絕上學行為問捲（SRBQC）併檢驗其效度和信度。方法：在文獻檢索、訪談、開放式問捲的基礎上形成初始條目，選取中小學學生573人試測併形成正式問捲。選取中小學學生946人施測正式問捲，用于進行結構效度及內部一緻性信度檢驗；以兒童社交焦慮量錶（SASC）為效標檢驗效標效度；2週後，隨機選取其中41人進行重測，檢驗重測信度。結果：問捲包括19箇條目，分為違抗行為、學校疏離、負性情緒、學習能力、軀體感受5箇因子，共解釋59.793％的方差變異；驗證性因素分析結果錶明模型擬閤較好（χ2＝329.51，df＝142，χ2／df＝2.32，CFI＝0.97，GFI＝0.93， IFI＝0.97，NFI＝0.95，NNFI＝0.96，RMSEA＝0.05，SRMR＝0.05）；問捲總分及各維度得分均與SASC得分呈正相關（r＝0.18～0.34，P＜0.01或0.05）。總問捲的Cronbach α繫數為0.87，各維度的繫數在0.55～0.78；總問捲的重測信度為0.84，各維度的重測信度在0.66～0.78。結論：本研究編製的兒童拒絕上學行為問捲符閤心理測量學要求，可用于我國兒童拒絕上學行為的評估。
목적：편제괄용우아국인동적거절상학행위문권（SRBQC）병검험기효도화신도。방법：재문헌검색、방담、개방식문권적기출상형성초시조목，선취중소학학생573인시측병형성정식문권。선취중소학학생946인시측정식문권，용우진행결구효도급내부일치성신도검험；이인동사교초필량표（SASC）위효표검험효표효도；2주후，수궤선취기중41인진행중측，검험중측신도。결과：문권포괄19개조목，분위위항행위、학교소리、부성정서、학습능력、구체감수5개인자，공해석59.793％적방차변이；험증성인소분석결과표명모형의합교호（χ2＝329.51，df＝142，χ2／df＝2.32，CFI＝0.97，GFI＝0.93， IFI＝0.97，NFI＝0.95，NNFI＝0.96，RMSEA＝0.05，SRMR＝0.05）；문권총분급각유도득분균여SASC득분정정상관（r＝0.18～0.34，P＜0.01혹0.05）。총문권적Cronbach α계수위0.87，각유도적계수재0.55～0.78；총문권적중측신도위0.84，각유도적중측신도재0.66～0.78。결론：본연구편제적인동거절상학행위문권부합심리측량학요구，가용우아국인동거절상학행위적평고。
Objective:To develop a Child School Refusal Behavior Rating Scale(SRBQC)and examine its reliabilities and validities. Methods:Based on literature review,interview,and open-ended questionnaire,124 origi-nal items were developed. Totally 573 students were recruited to complete the test version. After item and explorato-ry factor analysis,the formal scale-SRBQC was got. Totally 946 students were tested with formal version for further confirmatory factor analysis,internal consistency reliability and composite reliability. The criterion validity was test-ed with the Social Anxiety Scale for Child (SASC). Totally 41 students were retested for test-retest reliability with 2 weeks interval. Results:The formal version of SRBQC included 19 items. Exploratory factor analysis generated 5 factors which account 59. 793% of the variance in all,the results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that SR-BQC had a good construct validity (χ2 =329. 51,df=142,χ2/df=2. 32,CFI=0. 97,GFI=0. 93,IFI=0. 97,NFI=0. 95,NNFI=0. 96,RMSEA=0. 05,SRMR=0. 05). The SRBQC scores were positively correlated with the SASC scores (r=0. 18-0. 34,Ps<0. 05 ). The Cronbach coefficients were 0. 87 for the total questionnaire and 0. 55 -0. 78 for the 5 factors. The test-retest reliabilities were 0. 84 for the total questionnaire and 0. 66 -0. 78 for the 5 factors. Conclusion:The reliability and validity of the School Refusal Bevior Questionaire for Children(SRBQC) meet the needs of psychometrics.
