CAJ | 학술논문

目的：对目前国内使用青少年心理弹性量表（RSCA）评估儿童心理弹性的相关研究进行系统评价，了解中国儿童心理弹性现状及该领域研究现状。方法：检索中国生物医学数据库（CBM）、维普中文科技期刊数据库（VIP Database）、中国知网期刊数据库（CNKI）、万方数据在线知识服务平台（Wan-Fang Database）四个中文数据库从建库至2014年12月发表的文献，纳入使用青少年心理弹性量表（RSCA量表）测量我国儿童心理弹性现状的研究。运用均数和标准差的统计学公式对心理弹性数据进行合并；选取RSCA量表测量数据并计算标准化均数差（SMD）及其95％可信区间（95％CI），运用Review Manager 5.2软件对儿童内部的差异性进行meta分析。结果：最终纳入39项研究共计16493名儿，RSCA量表心理弹性总均分为（3.3±0.6），处于良好心理弹性水平。Meta分析结果显示，女童、非留守儿童、城市儿童、汉族儿童和独生子女的心理弹性总均分分别高于男童[SMD （95％CI）：0.09（－0.14～－0.05），P＜0.05]、留守儿童[SMD （95％CI）：－0.37（－0.56～－0.19）]、农村儿童[SMD （95％CI）：0.26（0.13～0.38）]、少数民族儿童[SMD （95％CI）：0.12（0.04～0.21）]和非独生子女[SMD （95％CI）：0.30（0.16～0.44）]。结论：目前中国儿童的整体心理弹性水平良好，但不同群体儿童的心理弹性存在差异。
목적：대목전국내사용청소년심리탄성량표（RSCA）평고인동심리탄성적상관연구진행계통평개，료해중국인동심리탄성현상급해영역연구현상。방법：검색중국생물의학수거고（CBM）、유보중문과기기간수거고（VIP Database）、중국지망기간수거고（CNKI）、만방수거재선지식복무평태（Wan-Fang Database）사개중문수거고종건고지2014년12월발표적문헌，납입사용청소년심리탄성량표（RSCA량표）측량아국인동심리탄성현상적연구。운용균수화표준차적통계학공식대심리탄성수거진행합병；선취RSCA량표측량수거병계산표준화균수차（SMD）급기95％가신구간（95％CI），운용Review Manager 5.2연건대인동내부적차이성진행meta분석。결과：최종납입39항연구공계16493명인，RSCA량표심리탄성총균분위（3.3±0.6），처우량호심리탄성수평。Meta분석결과현시，녀동、비류수인동、성시인동、한족인동화독생자녀적심리탄성총균분분별고우남동[SMD （95％CI）：0.09（－0.14～－0.05），P＜0.05]、류수인동[SMD （95％CI）：－0.37（－0.56～－0.19）]、농촌인동[SMD （95％CI）：0.26（0.13～0.38）]、소수민족인동[SMD （95％CI）：0.12（0.04～0.21）]화비독생자녀[SMD （95％CI）：0.30（0.16～0.44）]。결론：목전중국인동적정체심리탄성수평량호，단불동군체인동적심리탄성존재차이。
Objective:To synthesize the mental resilience of Chinese children tested with the Resilience Scale for Chinese Adolescents (RSCA)to evaluate its status as well as the research status. Methods:Four Chinese elec-tronic databases including China Biology Medicine disc (CBM),VIP Database,China National Knowledge Infra-structure (CNKI)and WangFang Database were searched from database established to December 2014. Literatures that reported the mental resilience status of Chinese children tested with RSCA were included. A statistical formula was used to synthesize means and standard deviations to get a total score;the standard mean difference (SMD)and 95% confidence interval (95%CI)of scores measured with RSCA scale were used to conduct meta-analyses usingthe software of Review Manager 5. 2 for comparison between different subgroups. Results:Thirty-nine studies with 16 493 children were included for the final analysis. Quantitative synthesis results showed that the average total score of Chinese children was (3. 3 0. 6 ). The status of psychological resilience was at a good level. The average psychological resilience scores of girls,not left-behind children,urban children,Han children and not-only-child were higher than those of boys [SMD (95%CI):-0. 09 (-0. 14--0. 05 )],left-behind children [SMD (95%CI):-0. 37(-0. 56--0. 19)],rural children [SMD (95%CI):0. 26(0. 13 -0. 38)],minority children [SMD (95%CI):0. 12(0. 04-0. 21)]and only-children [SMD (95%CI):0. 30(0. 16-0. 44)]respectively. Conclusion:The mental resilience of Chinese children is modest with internal diversity.