中华实验和临床感染病杂志（电子版）
中華實驗和臨床感染病雜誌（電子版）
중화실험화림상감염병잡지（전자판）
Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Version)
2015年
5期
657-660
,共4页
英媛媛%徐佳傲%丁雪%任微%孟冬娅%褚美玲
英媛媛%徐佳傲%丁雪%任微%孟鼕婭%褚美玲
영원원%서가오%정설%임미%맹동아%저미령
细菌培养%标本留取%合格率%阳性率
細菌培養%標本留取%閤格率%暘性率
세균배양%표본류취%합격솔%양성솔
Bacterial culture%Specimen collection%Positive rate%Qualiifed rate
目的 通过分析临床痰标本和角膜感染标本的留取方法与检测结果的关系,探讨不同标本留取方法对细菌培养结果的影响.方法 随机选择200例吸痰标本和200例咯痰标本,166例眼科角膜感染标本.统计细菌培养结果,对比分析不同方法之间细菌培养阳性率之间的差异.结果 吸痰留取的200例标本中,完全合格166份(合格率为83%),可接受标本34份;咯痰留取的200例标本中,完全合格标本108份,可接受标本92份,合格率为54%.咯痰标本阳性72份,阴性128份,阳性率为36%;咳痰标本细菌培养阳性44份,阴性156份,阳性率为22%.2种方法细菌培养阳性率差异具有统计学意义(χ2= 9.52,P< 0.05).眼科角膜感染拭子法标本阳性率为0%,角膜刮片法阳性率为32.5%.眼科标本的不同留取方法与阳性率之间,具有统计学意义(χ2= 19.54,P< 0.01).结论 不同标本留取方法对细菌培养结果的影响有显著性差异,临床医师、护士在日常工作中应高度重视患者标本的留取方法选择.
目的 通過分析臨床痰標本和角膜感染標本的留取方法與檢測結果的關繫,探討不同標本留取方法對細菌培養結果的影響.方法 隨機選擇200例吸痰標本和200例咯痰標本,166例眼科角膜感染標本.統計細菌培養結果,對比分析不同方法之間細菌培養暘性率之間的差異.結果 吸痰留取的200例標本中,完全閤格166份(閤格率為83%),可接受標本34份;咯痰留取的200例標本中,完全閤格標本108份,可接受標本92份,閤格率為54%.咯痰標本暘性72份,陰性128份,暘性率為36%;咳痰標本細菌培養暘性44份,陰性156份,暘性率為22%.2種方法細菌培養暘性率差異具有統計學意義(χ2= 9.52,P< 0.05).眼科角膜感染拭子法標本暘性率為0%,角膜颳片法暘性率為32.5%.眼科標本的不同留取方法與暘性率之間,具有統計學意義(χ2= 19.54,P< 0.01).結論 不同標本留取方法對細菌培養結果的影響有顯著性差異,臨床醫師、護士在日常工作中應高度重視患者標本的留取方法選擇.
목적 통과분석림상담표본화각막감염표본적류취방법여검측결과적관계,탐토불동표본류취방법대세균배양결과적영향.방법 수궤선택200례흡담표본화200례각담표본,166례안과각막감염표본.통계세균배양결과,대비분석불동방법지간세균배양양성솔지간적차이.결과 흡담류취적200례표본중,완전합격166빈(합격솔위83%),가접수표본34빈;각담류취적200례표본중,완전합격표본108빈,가접수표본92빈,합격솔위54%.각담표본양성72빈,음성128빈,양성솔위36%;해담표본세균배양양성44빈,음성156빈,양성솔위22%.2충방법세균배양양성솔차이구유통계학의의(χ2= 9.52,P< 0.05).안과각막감염식자법표본양성솔위0%,각막괄편법양성솔위32.5%.안과표본적불동류취방법여양성솔지간,구유통계학의의(χ2= 19.54,P< 0.01).결론 불동표본류취방법대세균배양결과적영향유현저성차이,림상의사、호사재일상공작중응고도중시환자표본적류취방법선택.
Objective To investigate the impaction of different collecting methods of specimen on the positive rate of culture results, and to analyze the relationship between the collecting methods of corneal infection and clinical sputum specimens and the results.Methods Total of 200 sputum specimens collected by patient' self-coughing and 200 aspiration of sputum specimens, and 166 cases of eye corneal infection specimens were selected randomly. The differences between the bacterial culture positive rates of different methods were compared.Results Qualiifed sputum specimens by suction machine were 166, there were 34 acceptable specimens, with the qualiifcation rate of 83%. Qualiifed sputum specimens by coughing were 108, there were 92 acceptable specimens, with the qualiifcation rate of 54%. The positive of sputum specimens by suction machine were 72, the negative of specimens with suction machine were 128, with the positive rate of 36%. The positive of coughing were 44, the negative of coughing were 156, with the positive rate of 22%. Different methods of sputum specimen collection had signiifcant difference (χ2= 9.52, P< 0.05) in statistical analysis with the positive rate. The positive rate of ophthalmology specimens by swabs was 0%, the positive rate of ophthalmology specimens by corneal scrapings was 32.5%. There was signiifcant difference (χ2= 19.54,P < 0.05) in the positive rate collecting with different methods of ophthalmology specimen. Conclusions The impact of the specimen collecting methods on bacterial culture results has significant differences. The clinicians, nurses should pay more attention to the method selection of the specimens sampling in patients.
