国际泌尿系统杂志
國際泌尿繫統雜誌
국제비뇨계통잡지
International Journal of Urology and Nephrology
2015年
6期
820-823
,共4页
王光%陈美凤%黄承智%蔡锦林
王光%陳美鳳%黃承智%蔡錦林
왕광%진미봉%황승지%채금림
输尿管结石%碎石术
輸尿管結石%碎石術
수뇨관결석%쇄석술
Ureteral Calculi%Lithotripsy
目的 探讨三种不同治疗方案治疗输尿管上段结石的实效性,为临床提供参考.方法 选取本院2013年1月至2014年1月期间收治的120例输尿管上段结石患者,将其分为A、B、C组,各40例,分别接受微创经皮肾镜取石术(MPCNL)、后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术(RUL)、输尿管镜下碎石术(URL),观察三组患者的手术时间、住院时间、碎石成功率等指标.结果 对三组患者的手术时间、并发症进行对比分析,差异有统计学意义(t=10.975,x2=9.082,P<0.05).对三组患者的住院时间、住院费用、碎石成功率及结石排尽率进行对比分析,差异有统计学意义(t=8.121、9.296,x2 =7.926、6.276,P<0.05).结论 对于输尿管上段结石疾病的判断及治疗,微创经皮肾镜取石术的清石成功率高,可以将其当作应该第一考虑的手术方式;后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术安全,并发症较低,失血量少.输尿管镜下碎石术的碎石成功率低,患者出现并发症的发生率较高,应该谨慎考虑.
目的 探討三種不同治療方案治療輸尿管上段結石的實效性,為臨床提供參攷.方法 選取本院2013年1月至2014年1月期間收治的120例輸尿管上段結石患者,將其分為A、B、C組,各40例,分彆接受微創經皮腎鏡取石術(MPCNL)、後腹腔鏡輸尿管切開取石術(RUL)、輸尿管鏡下碎石術(URL),觀察三組患者的手術時間、住院時間、碎石成功率等指標.結果 對三組患者的手術時間、併髮癥進行對比分析,差異有統計學意義(t=10.975,x2=9.082,P<0.05).對三組患者的住院時間、住院費用、碎石成功率及結石排儘率進行對比分析,差異有統計學意義(t=8.121、9.296,x2 =7.926、6.276,P<0.05).結論 對于輸尿管上段結石疾病的判斷及治療,微創經皮腎鏡取石術的清石成功率高,可以將其噹作應該第一攷慮的手術方式;後腹腔鏡輸尿管切開取石術安全,併髮癥較低,失血量少.輸尿管鏡下碎石術的碎石成功率低,患者齣現併髮癥的髮生率較高,應該謹慎攷慮.
목적 탐토삼충불동치료방안치료수뇨관상단결석적실효성,위림상제공삼고.방법 선취본원2013년1월지2014년1월기간수치적120례수뇨관상단결석환자,장기분위A、B、C조,각40례,분별접수미창경피신경취석술(MPCNL)、후복강경수뇨관절개취석술(RUL)、수뇨관경하쇄석술(URL),관찰삼조환자적수술시간、주원시간、쇄석성공솔등지표.결과 대삼조환자적수술시간、병발증진행대비분석,차이유통계학의의(t=10.975,x2=9.082,P<0.05).대삼조환자적주원시간、주원비용、쇄석성공솔급결석배진솔진행대비분석,차이유통계학의의(t=8.121、9.296,x2 =7.926、6.276,P<0.05).결론 대우수뇨관상단결석질병적판단급치료,미창경피신경취석술적청석성공솔고,가이장기당작응해제일고필적수술방식;후복강경수뇨관절개취석술안전,병발증교저,실혈량소.수뇨관경하쇄석술적쇄석성공솔저,환자출현병발증적발생솔교고,응해근신고필.
Objectives To observe the efficacy of patients with ureteral calculi treated with three different treatments.Methods 120 cases of patients with ureteral calculi were selected in our hospital from January 2013 to January 2014,divided into three groups with 40 cases of patients respectively.They were treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy surgery (MPCNL),ureterolithotomy laparoscopic surgery (RUL),and ureteroscopy lithotripsy (URL).The operative time,hospital stay,gravel and other indicators of success of patients were observed.Results For thc three groups of patients operative time,complications were analyzed,the difference was statistically significant (t =10.975,x2 =9.082,P <0.05).after three groups of patients hospital stay,hospital costs,the success rate of gravel and stones drained rates were compared,the difference was statistically significant (t =8.121,9.296,x2 =7.926,6.276,P <0.05).Conclusions For judgment and treatment of ureteral calculi segment disease,minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy clear stone success rate is high,it can be used as the first surgical procedure should be considered;ureterolithotomy after laparoscopic surgery safe,complications low,less blood loss.Ureteroscopy lithotripsy under rubble low success rate,patients with a higher incidence of complications,you should carefully consider.