CAJ | 학술논문

我国三大诉讼法陆续将电子证据作为一项独立的证据种类纳入立法，这给我国传统证据规则带来了冲击。纵观我国现有法律法规，对于电子证据的收集、保全、审查、判断、运用等方面证据规则的规定，仍旧散落在部分法律条文及相关司法解释当中。多数学者都承认我们迎来了电子证据时代，但“有立法、无规则”已经成为制约电子证据发挥其应有作用的最大瓶颈。实践中司法机关不得不参照既有的证据规则，常常会出现“不会用、不敢用、不能用”的现象，导致相当数量的电子证据被排除在案件事实证明范围之外，不利于案件事实真相的查明和作出公正的裁决。对于电子证据的运用，除了要遵循证据的真实、完整、合法等基本规则，还要结合电子证据自身特点对其规则进行完善。
아국삼대소송법륙속장전자증거작위일항독립적증거충류납입입법，저급아국전통증거규칙대래료충격。종관아국현유법율법규，대우전자증거적수집、보전、심사、판단、운용등방면증거규칙적규정，잉구산락재부분법률조문급상관사법해석당중。다수학자도승인아문영래료전자증거시대，단“유입법、무규칙”이경성위제약전자증거발휘기응유작용적최대병경。실천중사법궤관불득불삼조기유적증거규칙，상상회출현“불회용、불감용、불능용”적현상，도치상당수량적전자증거피배제재안건사실증명범위지외，불리우안건사실진상적사명화작출공정적재결。대우전자증거적운용，제료요준순증거적진실、완정、합법등기본규칙，환요결합전자증거자신특점대기규칙진행완선。
In three major procedural laws of China, electronic evidence is regarded as an independent type of evidence and incorporated into legislation , which put an impact on traditional evidence rules. Throughout the existing laws and regulations, rules on collection, preservation, check, judgment and application of electronic evidence , are still scattered in some laws and judicial explanations. A great majority of scholars have acknowledged that we ushered the period of electronic evidence. Nevertheless,“legislation without rules” becomes the biggest bottleneck, which blocks the functions of electronic evidence. Practically, judicial authorities have to refer to the existing evidence rules, always leading to a phenomenon of“do not use, dare not use and can not use”, which makes a quantity of electronic evidences excluded from the proof of facts and is against the investigation of the truth and true verdicts. In addition to following the evidence of the true, complete, legal and other basic rules, we should also combine the characteristics of electronic evidence itself to improve its rules.