中国环境科学
中國環境科學
중국배경과학
China Environmental Science
2015年
11期
3333-3339
,共7页
酆婧轩%李芸邑%师帅%刘阳生%汪群慧
酆婧軒%李蕓邑%師帥%劉暘生%汪群慧
풍청헌%리예읍%사수%류양생%왕군혜
铬渣%六价铬%硫代硫酸钠%磷酸钠
鉻渣%六價鉻%硫代硫痠鈉%燐痠鈉
락사%륙개락%류대류산납%린산납
COPR%hexavalent chromium%sodium thiosulfate%phosphate
以硫代硫酸钠为还原剂,将铬渣中的六价铬(Cr(VI))解毒转化为三价铬(Cr(III)),并加入磷酸盐作为稳定剂稳定解毒后的铬渣,考察不同反应时间和药剂用量对铬渣中Cr(VI)去除效果的影响.结果表明:硫代硫酸钠可以有效去除铬渣中的Cr(VI),当其与Cr(VI)的摩尔比为理论摩尔比的12倍、处理时间15d 时铬渣中 Cr(VI)的去除率达到最高(70%),继续增加还原剂用量或延长反应时间均不能有效提高 Cr(VI)的去除率.随后加入磷酸钠作为稳定剂,当其物质的量为生成Cr(III)的4倍时,硫代硫酸钠与磷酸钠分步加入(两步法)比同时加入(一步法)处理铬渣的效果较好,处理效果最好时总铬浸出浓度为6.1mg/L,低于危险废物浸出鉴别的总铬标准(15mg/L),而且形成稳定的铬的化合物(CrPO4·6H2O).铬渣pH值变化、五态变化、XRD及XPS分析等结果表明,两步法的处理效果好于一步法.
以硫代硫痠鈉為還原劑,將鉻渣中的六價鉻(Cr(VI))解毒轉化為三價鉻(Cr(III)),併加入燐痠鹽作為穩定劑穩定解毒後的鉻渣,攷察不同反應時間和藥劑用量對鉻渣中Cr(VI)去除效果的影響.結果錶明:硫代硫痠鈉可以有效去除鉻渣中的Cr(VI),噹其與Cr(VI)的摩爾比為理論摩爾比的12倍、處理時間15d 時鉻渣中 Cr(VI)的去除率達到最高(70%),繼續增加還原劑用量或延長反應時間均不能有效提高 Cr(VI)的去除率.隨後加入燐痠鈉作為穩定劑,噹其物質的量為生成Cr(III)的4倍時,硫代硫痠鈉與燐痠鈉分步加入(兩步法)比同時加入(一步法)處理鉻渣的效果較好,處理效果最好時總鉻浸齣濃度為6.1mg/L,低于危險廢物浸齣鑒彆的總鉻標準(15mg/L),而且形成穩定的鉻的化閤物(CrPO4·6H2O).鉻渣pH值變化、五態變化、XRD及XPS分析等結果錶明,兩步法的處理效果好于一步法.
이류대류산납위환원제,장락사중적륙개락(Cr(VI))해독전화위삼개락(Cr(III)),병가입린산염작위은정제은정해독후적락사,고찰불동반응시간화약제용량대락사중Cr(VI)거제효과적영향.결과표명:류대류산납가이유효거제락사중적Cr(VI),당기여Cr(VI)적마이비위이론마이비적12배、처리시간15d 시락사중 Cr(VI)적거제솔체도최고(70%),계속증가환원제용량혹연장반응시간균불능유효제고 Cr(VI)적거제솔.수후가입린산납작위은정제,당기물질적량위생성Cr(III)적4배시,류대류산납여린산납분보가입(량보법)비동시가입(일보법)처리락사적효과교호,처리효과최호시총락침출농도위6.1mg/L,저우위험폐물침출감별적총락표준(15mg/L),이차형성은정적락적화합물(CrPO4·6H2O).락사pH치변화、오태변화、XRD급XPS분석등결과표명,량보법적처리효과호우일보법.
Batch experiments were conducted to evaluate the feasibility of the remediation of Cr (VI) in COPR by the reductant sodium thiosulfate (Na2S2O3), and the mechanism for the reduction of Cr (VI) into Cr (III) was tested. After remediation treatment, phosphate was added to immobilize the Cr (III)-containing compounds in COPR. Different reaction time and dosages of reagents were investigated to evaluate the efficiency of Cr (VI) reduction. The results indicated that sodium thiosulfate could effectively remove Cr (VI) from COPR. When the molar ratio of Na2S2O3to Cr (VI) was 12: 1and the treating time was 15 days, 70% of Cr (VI) was removed; afterwards, further increases of reagent dosage and/or treating time had little effect on the removal of Cr (VI). Cr (III)-containing crystallines were observed after phosphate was added as an immobilizer, which significantly reduced the content of Cr (VI) in the COPR leachate. When the molar ratio of phosphate to Cr (III) was 4: 1, the leachable Cr (VI) was 6.1mg/L, which was much lower than the required concentration (≤15mg/L) in China Hazardous Waste Identification Criteria (GB 5085.3-2007). Moreover, the two-step treatment was more beneficial to remove Cr (VI) than the one-step treatment (i.e., Na2S2O3 and phosphate were simultaneously added into the COPR).