世界中西医结合杂志
世界中西醫結閤雜誌
세계중서의결합잡지
World Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine
2015年
11期
1539-1540,1554
,共3页
颈型%颈椎病%通督%正脊%临床观察
頸型%頸椎病%通督%正脊%臨床觀察
경형%경추병%통독%정척%림상관찰
Neck Type%Cervical Spondylosis%Tongdu%Zhengji%Clinical Observation
目的：通过观察通督正脊术与颈椎牵引治疗颈型颈椎病的疗效对比，探讨李建仲教授通督正脊术治疗颈型颈椎病的临床疗效。方法采用随机分组方法，将90例颈型颈椎病患者分为治疗组和对照组，每组各45例。治疗组采用通督正脊术治疗，对照组采用颈椎牵引治疗，两组每次均治疗20 min，隔日治疗1次，10次为1个疗程。1个疗程后观察治疗前后的症状积分、X 线片的变化。结果治疗后，治疗组的总有效率为93.3%，对照组为75.6%，两组患者治疗总有效率比较，差异有统计学意义（P <0.05）。两组治疗后与治疗前症状积分比较，差异有统计学意义（P <0.05）。治疗后组间比较，差异有统计学意义（P <0.05），治疗组优于对照组。结论通督正脊术治疗颈型颈椎病优于颈椎牵引治疗，且无明显副作用、经济安全，值得进一步推广运用。
目的：通過觀察通督正脊術與頸椎牽引治療頸型頸椎病的療效對比，探討李建仲教授通督正脊術治療頸型頸椎病的臨床療效。方法採用隨機分組方法，將90例頸型頸椎病患者分為治療組和對照組，每組各45例。治療組採用通督正脊術治療，對照組採用頸椎牽引治療，兩組每次均治療20 min，隔日治療1次，10次為1箇療程。1箇療程後觀察治療前後的癥狀積分、X 線片的變化。結果治療後，治療組的總有效率為93.3%，對照組為75.6%，兩組患者治療總有效率比較，差異有統計學意義（P <0.05）。兩組治療後與治療前癥狀積分比較，差異有統計學意義（P <0.05）。治療後組間比較，差異有統計學意義（P <0.05），治療組優于對照組。結論通督正脊術治療頸型頸椎病優于頸椎牽引治療，且無明顯副作用、經濟安全，值得進一步推廣運用。
목적：통과관찰통독정척술여경추견인치료경형경추병적료효대비，탐토리건중교수통독정척술치료경형경추병적림상료효。방법채용수궤분조방법，장90례경형경추병환자분위치료조화대조조，매조각45례。치료조채용통독정척술치료，대조조채용경추견인치료，량조매차균치료20 min，격일치료1차，10차위1개료정。1개료정후관찰치료전후적증상적분、X 선편적변화。결과치료후，치료조적총유효솔위93.3%，대조조위75.6%，량조환자치료총유효솔비교，차이유통계학의의（P <0.05）。량조치료후여치료전증상적분비교，차이유통계학의의（P <0.05）。치료후조간비교，차이유통계학의의（P <0.05），치료조우우대조조。결론통독정척술치료경형경추병우우경추견인치료，차무명현부작용、경제안전，치득진일보추엄운용。
Objective To compare the efficacy on cervical spondylosis of neck type between tongdu zhengji therapy(therapy for opening the Governor Vessel and spinal reduction)and cervical traction and dis-cus the clinical efficacy on cervical spondylosis of neck type treated by Prof. Li Jianzhong. Methods Using the randomization method,90 patients of cervical spondylosis of neck type were divided into a treatment group and a control group,45 cases in each one. In the treatment group,tongdu zhengji therapy was used. In the control group,the cervical traction was adopted. The treatment was 20 min each time,once every two days in the two groups. Ten treatments made one session. The symptom score and X - ray film condition were ob-served before and after treatment. Results After treatment,the total effective rate was 93. 3% in the treat-ment group and was 75. 6% in the control group,indicating the significant difference(P < 0. 05). The symp-tom score was different significantly before and after treatment in the two groups(P < 0. 05). The difference was significant after treatment between the two groups(P < 0. 05). The result in the treatment group was bet-ter than that in the control group. Conclusion The tongdu zhengji therapy achieves the better efficacy on cervical spondylosis of neck type as compared with the cervical traction. This therapy has no obvious side effects and is economic and safe. It deserves to be promoted in clinical practice.
