浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版)
浙江大學學報(農業與生命科學版)
절강대학학보(농업여생명과학판)
Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture & Life Sciences)
2015年
6期
685-694
,共10页
杨世民%杨志远%孙永健%马均
楊世民%楊誌遠%孫永健%馬均
양세민%양지원%손영건%마균
杂交稻%大穗型%中穗型%产量%氮肥运筹
雜交稻%大穗型%中穗型%產量%氮肥運籌
잡교도%대수형%중수형%산량%담비운주
hybrid rice%large panicle%medium panicle%grain yield%nitrogen management
以2个单穗质量差异较大的杂交稻品种川农优498(单穗质量大于5 g )和川优6203(单穗质量4 g左右)为试验材料,通过不同氮肥运筹措施研究两者在日照少、温差小和湿度大的生态条件下产量形成规律,并结合15 N示踪技术研究两者的氮素吸收利用特点。结果表明:大穗型和中穗型杂交稻每穗粒数无显著差异,中穗型杂交稻在有效穗数及总颖花量上具有显著优势,大穗型杂交稻则通过更高的千粒质量来实现更高的产量;大穗型和中穗型杂交稻成熟期干物质积累量差异不显著,前者花前干物质积累量大,且其向穗部转运能力更强,弥补了花后光合生产能力较弱的劣势;就氮肥运筹处理而言,大穗型和中穗型杂交稻产量最高处理的穗肥施用比例分别为40%和25%,依据穗肥比例与产量关系曲线,大穗型和中穗型杂交稻最佳的穗肥比例分别为33%和27%。大穗型和中穗型杂交稻不同生育阶段对氮素需求的差异是造成两者最佳穗肥比例不同的重要原因,两者对基肥吸收量无显著差异,但前者对穗肥吸收量更大,而后者对蘖肥积累更多;在最适穗肥比例的基础上继续前氮后移虽然能够提高氮肥回收率,但会引起氮肥生理利用率的迅速降低,使氮肥增产效果变差。
以2箇單穗質量差異較大的雜交稻品種川農優498(單穗質量大于5 g )和川優6203(單穗質量4 g左右)為試驗材料,通過不同氮肥運籌措施研究兩者在日照少、溫差小和濕度大的生態條件下產量形成規律,併結閤15 N示蹤技術研究兩者的氮素吸收利用特點。結果錶明:大穗型和中穗型雜交稻每穗粒數無顯著差異,中穗型雜交稻在有效穗數及總穎花量上具有顯著優勢,大穗型雜交稻則通過更高的韆粒質量來實現更高的產量;大穗型和中穗型雜交稻成熟期榦物質積纍量差異不顯著,前者花前榦物質積纍量大,且其嚮穗部轉運能力更彊,瀰補瞭花後光閤生產能力較弱的劣勢;就氮肥運籌處理而言,大穗型和中穗型雜交稻產量最高處理的穗肥施用比例分彆為40%和25%,依據穗肥比例與產量關繫麯線,大穗型和中穗型雜交稻最佳的穗肥比例分彆為33%和27%。大穗型和中穗型雜交稻不同生育階段對氮素需求的差異是造成兩者最佳穗肥比例不同的重要原因,兩者對基肥吸收量無顯著差異,但前者對穗肥吸收量更大,而後者對蘗肥積纍更多;在最適穗肥比例的基礎上繼續前氮後移雖然能夠提高氮肥迴收率,但會引起氮肥生理利用率的迅速降低,使氮肥增產效果變差。
이2개단수질량차이교대적잡교도품충천농우498(단수질량대우5 g )화천우6203(단수질량4 g좌우)위시험재료,통과불동담비운주조시연구량자재일조소、온차소화습도대적생태조건하산량형성규률,병결합15 N시종기술연구량자적담소흡수이용특점。결과표명:대수형화중수형잡교도매수립수무현저차이,중수형잡교도재유효수수급총영화량상구유현저우세,대수형잡교도칙통과경고적천립질량래실현경고적산량;대수형화중수형잡교도성숙기간물질적루량차이불현저,전자화전간물질적루량대,차기향수부전운능력경강,미보료화후광합생산능력교약적열세;취담비운주처리이언,대수형화중수형잡교도산량최고처리적수비시용비례분별위40%화25%,의거수비비례여산량관계곡선,대수형화중수형잡교도최가적수비비례분별위33%화27%。대수형화중수형잡교도불동생육계단대담소수구적차이시조성량자최가수비비례불동적중요원인,량자대기비흡수량무현저차이,단전자대수비흡수량경대,이후자대얼비적루경다;재최괄수비비례적기출상계속전담후이수연능구제고담비회수솔,단회인기담비생리이용솔적신속강저,사담비증산효과변차。
Summary In Sichuan Basin with low solar radiation , the grain yield of hybrid rice was restricted by the high humidity and small diurnal temperature . The breeding and application of large panicle hybrid varieties solved the problem to a certain extent . However , the high‐yielding performance of large panicle hybrid rice was not stable . In order to explore the measures of maintaining the high‐yielding performance of large panicle hybrid rice , it is necessary to investigate the characters of its grain yield formation . Two hybrid varieties with different panicle masses (Chuannongyou 498 , about 5 g per panicle;Chuanyou 6203 , about 4 g per panicle) were studied on the differences of dry matter accumulation and yield components , and five different nitrogen ( N) managements ( the N application proportion of base‐tillering and panicle fertilizers was 90∶10 , 75∶ 25 , 60∶ 40 , 45∶ 55 , 30∶ 70 , respectively) integrated with 15 N tracing were applied to investigate the traits of N uptake across the whole growth stage . The results showed that there was no significant difference in spikelet per panicle between large and medium panicle hybrid rice . Medium panicle hybrid rice showed significant advantages in effective panicles and total spikelet compared to large panicle hybrid rice;however , the thousand‐grain mass of large panicle hybrid rice was larger , and this superiority played a major role in gaining higher grain yield than medium panicle hybrid rice . There was no significant difference in dry matter accumulation at maturity stage between large and medium panicle hybrid rice , but difference of dry matter productivity was observed before and after anthesis . Compared to medium panicle hybrid rice , large panicle hybrid rice accumulated more dry matters before anthesis , and larger percentage of which was exported to the panicle at anthesis , contributing approximately 40% of its grain yield . For medium panicle hybrid rice , dry matter exportation only contributed about 25% of its grain yield . For N management treatments , 40% and 25% were the optimal panicle N ratios which could gain the highest grain yields for large and medium panicle hybrid rice respectively . According to the relation formula between panicle N ratio and grain yield , 33% was the optimal panicle N ratio which produced the most grains for large panicle hybrid rice , while the optimal panicle N ratio for medium panicle hybrid rice was 27% . The difference for the optimal panicle N ratio between large and medium panicle hybrid rice was caused by varied demands on N at different growth stages . There was no significant difference for N uptake of basal fertilizer between large and medium panicle hybrid rice . Medium panicle hybrid rice showed significant merits in assimilating N at tillering stage than large panicle hybrid rice . In contrast , large panicle hybrid rice assimilated more N at booting stage . A further increase of panicle N based on the optimal panicle N ratio could increase N recovery efficiency , but N physiological efficiency would drop rapidly and the yield‐increasing effects of N fertilizer became poor . In conclusion , 33% and 27% are the optimal panicle N ratios for large and medium panicle hybrid rice , respectively , which increase the grain yield and N utilization efficiency simultaneously .