北华大学学报（自然科学版）
北華大學學報（自然科學版）
북화대학학보（자연과학판）
Journal of Beihua University (Natural Science)
2015年
6期
764-766
,共3页
鼻咽癌%调强放疗%常规放疗%总有效率%黏膜反应
鼻嚥癌%調彊放療%常規放療%總有效率%黏膜反應
비인암%조강방료%상규방료%총유효솔%점막반응
NPC%IMRT%conventional radiotherapy%total effect%mucosa reactions
目的：分析比较鼻咽癌患者调强放疗与常规放疗的优势.方法70例鼻咽癌患者随机分为两组,调强放疗组(IMRT)35例,常规放疗组(CRT)35例. IMRT组靶区为鼻咽肿瘤、咽旁间隙和颈部淋巴区,放射剂量DT 70 Gy；CRT组采用面颈联合野加颈部切线野照射,原发灶根治量为DT 70~72 Gy,颈部预防治疗量DT 50 Gy.结果 IMRT组和CRT组总有效率分别为94.3%和85.7%,口腔黏膜反应Ⅳ级两组分别为0例和2例,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论鼻咽癌调强放疗比常规放疗有明显优势.
目的：分析比較鼻嚥癌患者調彊放療與常規放療的優勢.方法70例鼻嚥癌患者隨機分為兩組,調彊放療組(IMRT)35例,常規放療組(CRT)35例. IMRT組靶區為鼻嚥腫瘤、嚥徬間隙和頸部淋巴區,放射劑量DT 70 Gy；CRT組採用麵頸聯閤野加頸部切線野照射,原髮竈根治量為DT 70~72 Gy,頸部預防治療量DT 50 Gy.結果 IMRT組和CRT組總有效率分彆為94.3%和85.7%,口腔黏膜反應Ⅳ級兩組分彆為0例和2例,兩組比較差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05).結論鼻嚥癌調彊放療比常規放療有明顯優勢.
목적：분석비교비인암환자조강방료여상규방료적우세.방법70례비인암환자수궤분위량조,조강방료조(IMRT)35례,상규방료조(CRT)35례. IMRT조파구위비인종류、인방간극화경부림파구,방사제량DT 70 Gy；CRT조채용면경연합야가경부절선야조사,원발조근치량위DT 70~72 Gy,경부예방치료량DT 50 Gy.결과 IMRT조화CRT조총유효솔분별위94.3%화85.7%,구강점막반응Ⅳ급량조분별위0례화2례,량조비교차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05).결론비인암조강방료비상규방료유명현우세.
Objective To analyze and compare the advantages of IMRT and conventional radiotherapy of NPC patients. Method 70 cases with NPC are divide into two groups: 35 cases in IMRT group and 35 cases in conventional radiotherapy ( CRT) . To the IMRT group,the targets are neoplasms,parapharyngeal space,cervical lymph node areas and DT 70 Gy;To the CRT group,the methods are face-neck joint field plus neck tangential field irradiation,with the treatment amount of primary tumor cure being DT 70~72 Gy and the treatment amount of prevention and treatment of cervical area being DT 50 Gy. Results The total effects of the IMRT group and the CRT group were 94. 3% and 85. 7%,respectively;the oral mucosa reactions with gradeⅣwere no case and two cases,respectively. There was a significant difference between the two groups (P<0. 05). Conclusion The IMRT has an obvious advantage than the conventional radiotherapy of NPC patients.
