作物研究
作物研究
작물연구
Crop Research
2015年
z2期
851-855
,共5页
陈明刚%周清明%陆中山%田峰%李跃平%杨丽丽%楚轶欧
陳明剛%週清明%陸中山%田峰%李躍平%楊麗麗%楚軼歐
진명강%주청명%륙중산%전봉%리약평%양려려%초질구
烤烟%密集烘烤%装烟方式%综合效益
烤煙%密集烘烤%裝煙方式%綜閤效益
고연%밀집홍고%장연방식%종합효익
flue -cured tobacco%bulk curing barn%method of loading tobacco leaf%comparative efficiency
为探索现代烟草农业减工降本措施,采用梳式烟夹、装烟箱、散叶堆积、散叶小捆和常规烟竿5种装烟方式,对其装烟效率、烘烤成本及烤后烟叶经济性状进行了研究。结果表明,与常规烟竿相比,4种装烟方式劳动用工减少73.26%~82.44%,装烟量增加35.13%~50.63%,梳式烟夹、装烟箱和散叶小捆烘烤耗能成本低于常规烟竿,而散叶堆积烘烤能耗成本高于常规烟竿。4种装烟方式新增烤房设施增加投入回收时间为1.05~3.44年。在烤后烟叶经济性状方面,梳式烟夹装烟与常规烟竿基本相当,装烟箱、散叶堆积和散叶小捆略低。综合烤后烟叶的经济性状和能耗成本,以梳式烟夹装烟的效益最好。
為探索現代煙草農業減工降本措施,採用梳式煙夾、裝煙箱、散葉堆積、散葉小捆和常規煙竿5種裝煙方式,對其裝煙效率、烘烤成本及烤後煙葉經濟性狀進行瞭研究。結果錶明,與常規煙竿相比,4種裝煙方式勞動用工減少73.26%~82.44%,裝煙量增加35.13%~50.63%,梳式煙夾、裝煙箱和散葉小捆烘烤耗能成本低于常規煙竿,而散葉堆積烘烤能耗成本高于常規煙竿。4種裝煙方式新增烤房設施增加投入迴收時間為1.05~3.44年。在烤後煙葉經濟性狀方麵,梳式煙夾裝煙與常規煙竿基本相噹,裝煙箱、散葉堆積和散葉小捆略低。綜閤烤後煙葉的經濟性狀和能耗成本,以梳式煙夾裝煙的效益最好。
위탐색현대연초농업감공강본조시,채용소식연협、장연상、산협퇴적、산협소곤화상규연간5충장연방식,대기장연효솔、홍고성본급고후연협경제성상진행료연구。결과표명,여상규연간상비,4충장연방식노동용공감소73.26%~82.44%,장연량증가35.13%~50.63%,소식연협、장연상화산협소곤홍고모능성본저우상규연간,이산협퇴적홍고능모성본고우상규연간。4충장연방식신증고방설시증가투입회수시간위1.05~3.44년。재고후연협경제성상방면,소식연협장연여상규연간기본상당,장연상、산협퇴적화산협소곤략저。종합고후연협적경제성상화능모성본,이소식연협장연적효익최호。
In order to investigate the measures of saving labor force and energy during the development of tobacco agricul-tural modernization,the loading efficiency,energy cost and economic characters were studied using five loading methods:loading leaf with clip,loading with box,loose -leaf accumulation,loose -leaf wisp,and traditional loading leaf with pole. The results showed that four methods of loading leaf (loading leaf with clip,loading with box,loose -leaf accumulation, loose -leaf wisp)decreased the cost of labor force by 73.26% ~82.44%,and raised barn loading amount by 35.13% ~50.63% during curing when compared with the method of traditional loading leaf.The energy cost during curing of tradi-tional loading leaf with pole was higher than loading leaf with clip,loading with box,loose -leaf wisp but lower than loose-leaf accumulation.The time of invest recovery of new barn using four methods of loading leaf is 1.05 ~3.44 year/666.7m2 compared with the method of traditional loading leaf.The difference of the economic characters of curing leaves between loading leaf with clip and traditional loading leaf with pole was inconspicuous,while loading with box,loose -leaf accumulation and loose -leaf wisp were worse than traditional loading leaf with pole.The benefit of loading leaf with clip was the best considering both economic characters and energy cost.