中国继续医学教育
中國繼續醫學教育
중국계속의학교육
China Continuing Medical Education
2015年
30期
224-225
,共2页
宋黄瑜%赵婕%郭静
宋黃瑜%趙婕%郭靜
송황유%조첩%곽정
整体护理干预%冠心病合并心绞痛%预后质量
整體護理榦預%冠心病閤併心絞痛%預後質量
정체호리간예%관심병합병심교통%예후질량
Holistic nursing interventions%Coronary heart disease and angina pectoris%Outcomes quality
目的:研究分析整体护理对冠心病合并心绞痛患者心绞痛发作及预后的影响。方法选取2014年6月~2015年6月收治的60例冠心病合并心绞痛患者为研究对象,随机分成两组。其中30例对照组患者采用常规的传统护理方式进行护理;30例观察组患者在常规护理基础上给予患者全面的整体护理干预措施。统计对比两组患者一个月护理期内的心绞痛发作次数以及患者预后的质量。结果观察组患者在护理一个月内心绞痛发作的次数高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05);观察组患者预后质量优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论整体护理在冠心病合并心绞痛患者中护理效果显著,能降低患者心绞痛的发生次数,提高患者预后质量。
目的:研究分析整體護理對冠心病閤併心絞痛患者心絞痛髮作及預後的影響。方法選取2014年6月~2015年6月收治的60例冠心病閤併心絞痛患者為研究對象,隨機分成兩組。其中30例對照組患者採用常規的傳統護理方式進行護理;30例觀察組患者在常規護理基礎上給予患者全麵的整體護理榦預措施。統計對比兩組患者一箇月護理期內的心絞痛髮作次數以及患者預後的質量。結果觀察組患者在護理一箇月內心絞痛髮作的次數高于對照組,差異具有統計學意義(P <0.05);觀察組患者預後質量優于對照組,差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論整體護理在冠心病閤併心絞痛患者中護理效果顯著,能降低患者心絞痛的髮生次數,提高患者預後質量。
목적:연구분석정체호리대관심병합병심교통환자심교통발작급예후적영향。방법선취2014년6월~2015년6월수치적60례관심병합병심교통환자위연구대상,수궤분성량조。기중30례대조조환자채용상규적전통호리방식진행호리;30례관찰조환자재상규호리기출상급여환자전면적정체호리간예조시。통계대비량조환자일개월호리기내적심교통발작차수이급환자예후적질량。결과관찰조환자재호리일개월내심교통발작적차수고우대조조,차이구유통계학의의(P <0.05);관찰조환자예후질량우우대조조,차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론정체호리재관심병합병심교통환자중호리효과현저,능강저환자심교통적발생차수,제고환자예후질량。
Objective To research and analyze impact of the overall care on patients with coronary heart disease and pectoris angina prognosis.Methods We selected 60 cases with coronary heart disease and angina pectoris from June 2014 to June 2015 for the study. They were randomly divided into two groups. The 30 patients of the control group were treated with conventional traditional nursing care. The other 30 cases of the observation group were given comprehensive holistic nursing interventions based on the routine care. Times of angina attacks and Quality of prognostic patients’ life of two groups during the month of nursing were made statistical comparison. Results Times of angina attacks of the observation group during the month of nursing were obviously higher than the control group. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Quality of prognostic patients’ life of the observation group was higher than the control group. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Effects of overall care on patients with coronary heart disease and pectoris angina prognosis is remarkable. It can reduce the times of angina attacks. And improve the quality of prognostic patients’ life.