徐州医学院学报
徐州醫學院學報
서주의학원학보
Acta Academiae Medicinae Xuzhou
2015年
10期
711-713
,共3页
动静脉内瘘%尿毒症
動靜脈內瘺%尿毒癥
동정맥내루%뇨독증
internal arteriovenous fistula%uremia
目的:通过对比尿毒症造瘘患者动静脉瘘端-端吻合与端-侧吻合的优缺点,探索动静脉造瘘的最佳方法。方法回顾性分析我院2011年1月—2014年1月住院期间接受动静脉造瘘手术的262例尿毒症患者的临床资料,其中86例患者( A组)行前臂远端桡动脉和头静脉端-端吻合术,176例患者( B组)行前臂远端桡动脉和头静脉端-侧吻合术,分析A、B两组患者术后并发症发生率、8周内瘘成熟率、2个月后透析流量与1、3年通畅率。结果 A组患者8周内瘘成熟率、窃血综合征发生率高于B组(P<0.05),两组1、3年通畅率及2个月后透析流量≥300 ml/min患者所占比例的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论两种吻合造瘘方法在长期透析使用时无明显差异。
目的:通過對比尿毒癥造瘺患者動靜脈瘺耑-耑吻閤與耑-側吻閤的優缺點,探索動靜脈造瘺的最佳方法。方法迴顧性分析我院2011年1月—2014年1月住院期間接受動靜脈造瘺手術的262例尿毒癥患者的臨床資料,其中86例患者( A組)行前臂遠耑橈動脈和頭靜脈耑-耑吻閤術,176例患者( B組)行前臂遠耑橈動脈和頭靜脈耑-側吻閤術,分析A、B兩組患者術後併髮癥髮生率、8週內瘺成熟率、2箇月後透析流量與1、3年通暢率。結果 A組患者8週內瘺成熟率、竊血綜閤徵髮生率高于B組(P<0.05),兩組1、3年通暢率及2箇月後透析流量≥300 ml/min患者所佔比例的差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論兩種吻閤造瘺方法在長期透析使用時無明顯差異。
목적:통과대비뇨독증조루환자동정맥루단-단문합여단-측문합적우결점,탐색동정맥조루적최가방법。방법회고성분석아원2011년1월—2014년1월주원기간접수동정맥조루수술적262례뇨독증환자적림상자료,기중86례환자( A조)행전비원단뇨동맥화두정맥단-단문합술,176례환자( B조)행전비원단뇨동맥화두정맥단-측문합술,분석A、B량조환자술후병발증발생솔、8주내루성숙솔、2개월후투석류량여1、3년통창솔。결과 A조환자8주내루성숙솔、절혈종합정발생솔고우B조(P<0.05),량조1、3년통창솔급2개월후투석류량≥300 ml/min환자소점비례적차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론량충문합조루방법재장기투석사용시무명현차이。
Objective To explore an optimum approach for artificial arteriovenous fistula through comparison of end-to-end and end-to-side nastomosis between the distal radial artery and cephalic vein in uremia patients.Methods A retrospective analysis was conduct, using clinical data from 262 uremia patients receiving fistula operation from Janu-ary 2011 to January 2014 in our hospital.Among these patients were 86 patients ( Group A) receiving end-to-end an-astomosis between the distal forearm radial artery and cephalic vein, and 176 patients ( Group B) receiving end-to-side anastomosis between the distal forearm radial artery and cephalic vein.Then, both groups were compared for the in-cidence of postoperative complications, fistula maturation rate within eight weeks, dialysis flow after two months and reca-nalization rate within one and three years.Results Group A produced increases in fistula maturation rate within eight weeks and steal syndrome incidence than Group B (P<0.05).No statistical difference was found between both groups as to dialysis flow after two months and recanalization rate within one and three years.Conclusion No remarkable differ-ence was found between both approaches during long-term dialysis.