徐州医学院学报
徐州醫學院學報
서주의학원학보
Acta Academiae Medicinae Xuzhou
2015年
10期
673-677
,共5页
万一元%王晓炜%惠红霞%万莉
萬一元%王曉煒%惠紅霞%萬莉
만일원%왕효위%혜홍하%만리
吉西他滨%固定剂量率%奥沙利铂%癌,胰腺
吉西他濱%固定劑量率%奧沙利鉑%癌,胰腺
길서타빈%고정제량솔%오사리박%암,이선
gemcitabine%fixed dose rate%oxaliplatin%caner%pancreas
目的:探讨奥沙利铂分别与吉西他滨固定剂量率输注、常规输注联合应用对进展胰腺癌的治疗效果。方法67例初治、无法手术切除的进展期胰腺癌患者,随机分成研究组和对照组。研究组采用吉西他滨固定剂量率(10 mg· m-2· min-1)输注联合奥沙利铂方案,对照组采用吉西他滨标准输注(30 min)联合奥沙利铂方案化疗,每21天为一个周期,每例患者完成4周期(至少2周期)化疗。治疗期间随访评价2组疗效、不良反应。结果研究组、对照组的客观缓解率分别为32.35%(11/34)、12.12%(4/33),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);临床获益率及临床受益反应研究组亦优于对照组,分别为67.65% vs.36.36%、61.76% vs.42.42%,二者比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组、对照组的总生存时间分别为(335.36±19.45)天、(243.59±21.87)天,至肿瘤进展时间分别为(163.52±17.08)天、(147.39±16.44)天,组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。不良反应方面,主要为血液学毒性,尤其Ⅲ-Ⅳ度白细胞、血小板减少发生率研究组明显高于对照组( P<0.05);而非血液学不良反应发生率2组相似( P>0.05)。结论吉西他滨固定剂量率输注联合奥沙利铂方案治疗进展期胰腺癌具有较高的客观缓解率及临床受益反应,延长了总生存时间及至肿瘤进展时间;非血液学不良反应发生率较低,患者耐受性较好;但其血液学毒性较为显著,需引起足够重视。
目的:探討奧沙利鉑分彆與吉西他濱固定劑量率輸註、常規輸註聯閤應用對進展胰腺癌的治療效果。方法67例初治、無法手術切除的進展期胰腺癌患者,隨機分成研究組和對照組。研究組採用吉西他濱固定劑量率(10 mg· m-2· min-1)輸註聯閤奧沙利鉑方案,對照組採用吉西他濱標準輸註(30 min)聯閤奧沙利鉑方案化療,每21天為一箇週期,每例患者完成4週期(至少2週期)化療。治療期間隨訪評價2組療效、不良反應。結果研究組、對照組的客觀緩解率分彆為32.35%(11/34)、12.12%(4/33),差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);臨床穫益率及臨床受益反應研究組亦優于對照組,分彆為67.65% vs.36.36%、61.76% vs.42.42%,二者比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);研究組、對照組的總生存時間分彆為(335.36±19.45)天、(243.59±21.87)天,至腫瘤進展時間分彆為(163.52±17.08)天、(147.39±16.44)天,組間比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。不良反應方麵,主要為血液學毒性,尤其Ⅲ-Ⅳ度白細胞、血小闆減少髮生率研究組明顯高于對照組( P<0.05);而非血液學不良反應髮生率2組相似( P>0.05)。結論吉西他濱固定劑量率輸註聯閤奧沙利鉑方案治療進展期胰腺癌具有較高的客觀緩解率及臨床受益反應,延長瞭總生存時間及至腫瘤進展時間;非血液學不良反應髮生率較低,患者耐受性較好;但其血液學毒性較為顯著,需引起足夠重視。
목적:탐토오사리박분별여길서타빈고정제량솔수주、상규수주연합응용대진전이선암적치료효과。방법67례초치、무법수술절제적진전기이선암환자,수궤분성연구조화대조조。연구조채용길서타빈고정제량솔(10 mg· m-2· min-1)수주연합오사리박방안,대조조채용길서타빈표준수주(30 min)연합오사리박방안화료,매21천위일개주기,매례환자완성4주기(지소2주기)화료。치료기간수방평개2조료효、불량반응。결과연구조、대조조적객관완해솔분별위32.35%(11/34)、12.12%(4/33),차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);림상획익솔급림상수익반응연구조역우우대조조,분별위67.65% vs.36.36%、61.76% vs.42.42%,이자비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);연구조、대조조적총생존시간분별위(335.36±19.45)천、(243.59±21.87)천,지종류진전시간분별위(163.52±17.08)천、(147.39±16.44)천,조간비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。불량반응방면,주요위혈액학독성,우기Ⅲ-Ⅳ도백세포、혈소판감소발생솔연구조명현고우대조조( P<0.05);이비혈액학불량반응발생솔2조상사( P>0.05)。결론길서타빈고정제량솔수주연합오사리박방안치료진전기이선암구유교고적객관완해솔급림상수익반응,연장료총생존시간급지종류진전시간;비혈액학불량반응발생솔교저,환자내수성교호;단기혈액학독성교위현저,수인기족구중시。
Objective To compare the efficacy of oxaliplatin combined with gemcitabine through fixed-dose or rou-tine infusion to treat advanced pancreatic cancer.Methods A total of 67 advanced pancreatic cancer patients who were recently diagnosed and unable to perform surgery were enrolled into the current study.They were randomly divided into the following groups:a research group in which patients received oxaliplatin in combination with gemcitabine through infu-sion at a fixed dose rate of 10 mg/m2 per minute, and a control group in which patients were administrated with oxalipla-tin combined with gemcitabine through routine infusion within 30 min.Each patient underwent at least two courses of treatment, 21 days in each course.Then, both groups were compared for efficacy and adverse reactions during follow-up visits.Results The objective response rate (ORR) was 32.35 % (11/34) for the research group and 12.12% (4/33) for the control.The clinical benefit rate and clinical benefit response( CBR) were 67.65%and 36.36%for the re-search group, and 61.76%and 42.42% for the control.These data were significantly different from each other ( P<0.05).The overall survival (OS) was (335.36 ±19.45) days for the research group and (243.59 ±21.87) days for the control.The time to progression (TTP) was (163.52 ±17.08) days for the research group and (147.39 ±16.44) days for the control.These data were significantly different from each other (P<0.05).The major adverse events in-cluded hematological toxicity, especially significantly increased incidence of Grade III/IV leucocytopenia and thrombocy-topenia (P<0.05).The incidence of non-hematological toxicity was similar between both groups (P>0.05).Con-clusion Oxaliplatin in combination with gemcitabine through fixed dose infusion is effective for treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer, with a higher ORR and CBR as well as longer OS and TTP.Its non-hematological toxicity is less fre-quent and well-tolerated, despite of its remarkable hematological toxicity which needs special attention.