中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
China Foreign Medical Treatment
2015年
31期
43-44,59
,共3页
轻弹力%Lace-back牵引%口腔正畸
輕彈力%Lace-back牽引%口腔正畸
경탄력%Lace-back견인%구강정기
Light elasticity%Lace-back traction%Orthodontics
目的:对比轻弹力尖牙方式和Lace-back牵引尖牙方式在口腔正畸排齐阶段中的效果。方法随机选取2013年1月-2014年12月于该院接受治疗的70例口腔正畸排齐阶段的患者作为病例资料,随机分为观察组35例和对照组35例,对照组采用Lace-back牵引尖牙方式进行矫正,观察组采用轻弹力尖牙方式进行矫正。观察两组患者排齐前后尖牙间宽度、旋转度以及磨牙间宽度、旋转度等指标,并对研究结果进行分析比较。结果排齐后,观察组患者的尖牙间宽度、旋转度明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者的尖牙远移程度比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);而观察组患者的治疗周期明显短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论轻弹力尖牙方式在口腔正畸排齐矫正中治疗周期较短,见效快,而Lace-back牵引尖牙方式对排齐牙列程度上控制较稳定。
目的:對比輕彈力尖牙方式和Lace-back牽引尖牙方式在口腔正畸排齊階段中的效果。方法隨機選取2013年1月-2014年12月于該院接受治療的70例口腔正畸排齊階段的患者作為病例資料,隨機分為觀察組35例和對照組35例,對照組採用Lace-back牽引尖牙方式進行矯正,觀察組採用輕彈力尖牙方式進行矯正。觀察兩組患者排齊前後尖牙間寬度、鏇轉度以及磨牙間寬度、鏇轉度等指標,併對研究結果進行分析比較。結果排齊後,觀察組患者的尖牙間寬度、鏇轉度明顯優于對照組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。兩組患者的尖牙遠移程度比較,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);而觀察組患者的治療週期明顯短于對照組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論輕彈力尖牙方式在口腔正畸排齊矯正中治療週期較短,見效快,而Lace-back牽引尖牙方式對排齊牙列程度上控製較穩定。
목적:대비경탄력첨아방식화Lace-back견인첨아방식재구강정기배제계단중적효과。방법수궤선취2013년1월-2014년12월우해원접수치료적70례구강정기배제계단적환자작위병례자료,수궤분위관찰조35례화대조조35례,대조조채용Lace-back견인첨아방식진행교정,관찰조채용경탄력첨아방식진행교정。관찰량조환자배제전후첨아간관도、선전도이급마아간관도、선전도등지표,병대연구결과진행분석비교。결과배제후,관찰조환자적첨아간관도、선전도명현우우대조조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。량조환자적첨아원이정도비교,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);이관찰조환자적치료주기명현단우대조조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론경탄력첨아방식재구강정기배제교정중치료주기교단,견효쾌,이Lace-back견인첨아방식대배제아렬정도상공제교은정。
Objective To compare the effect between light elastic and Lace-back canine traction during aligning the teeth. Methods The clinical data of 70 cases underwent orthodontic treatment of aligning the teeth in our hospital from January 2013 to December 2014 were selected. The patients were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group with 35 cases in each. The control group were treated by Lace-back canine traction for straightening teeth, while the obser-vation group were treated by light elastic canine traction. The intercanine width and rotation, molar width and rotation and other parameters of the two groups were observed before and after straightening teeth. And the study results of the two groups were analyzed comparatively. Results After straightening teeth, the intercanine width and rotation of the observation group were much better than those of the control group with statistically significant difference (P<0.05). No statistically sig-nificant difference in the canine distalization extent was found between the two groups (P>0.05). The treatment period of the observation group was significantly shorter than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Light elastic canine traction has shorter treatment period and quicker effect on aligning the teeth than Lace-back canine traction but the latter controls the stability of aligning the teeth better.