中南医学科学杂志
中南醫學科學雜誌
중남의학과학잡지
Medical Science Journal of Central South China
2015年
6期
642-645
,共4页
非小细胞肺癌%吉西他滨%顺铂%奥沙利铂%老年
非小細胞肺癌%吉西他濱%順鉑%奧沙利鉑%老年
비소세포폐암%길서타빈%순박%오사리박%노년
non-small cell lung cancer%Gemcitabine%Cisplatin%Oxaliplatin%elderly
目的:对比分析吉西他滨联合不同铂剂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌( NSCLC)初治老龄患者的疗效及安全性。方法122例非小细胞肺癌晚期老龄患者依照随机数字表法分为研究组和对照组各61人。对照组应用吉西他滨联合顺铂化疗,研究组应用吉西他滨联合奥沙利铂化疗。对比两组近期疗效、无进展生存时间、治疗前后的体质量与KPS评分、严重不良反应发生情况。结果两组缓解率、控制率、无进展生存时间无显著差异( P>0.05)。两组治疗前体质量及KPS评分无显著差异(P>0.05),治疗后两组体质量及KPS评分较治疗前均显著改善(P<0.05),研究组体质量及KPS评分改善幅度显著优于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组严重不良反应发生率显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论晚期非小细胞肺癌初治老龄患者给予吉西他滨联合奥沙利铂无法提升近期疗效,但可显著提高患者的体质及生存质量,毒副反应更小。
目的:對比分析吉西他濱聯閤不同鉑劑治療晚期非小細胞肺癌( NSCLC)初治老齡患者的療效及安全性。方法122例非小細胞肺癌晚期老齡患者依照隨機數字錶法分為研究組和對照組各61人。對照組應用吉西他濱聯閤順鉑化療,研究組應用吉西他濱聯閤奧沙利鉑化療。對比兩組近期療效、無進展生存時間、治療前後的體質量與KPS評分、嚴重不良反應髮生情況。結果兩組緩解率、控製率、無進展生存時間無顯著差異( P>0.05)。兩組治療前體質量及KPS評分無顯著差異(P>0.05),治療後兩組體質量及KPS評分較治療前均顯著改善(P<0.05),研究組體質量及KPS評分改善幅度顯著優于對照組(P<0.05)。研究組嚴重不良反應髮生率顯著低于對照組(P<0.05)。結論晚期非小細胞肺癌初治老齡患者給予吉西他濱聯閤奧沙利鉑無法提升近期療效,但可顯著提高患者的體質及生存質量,毒副反應更小。
목적:대비분석길서타빈연합불동박제치료만기비소세포폐암( NSCLC)초치노령환자적료효급안전성。방법122례비소세포폐암만기노령환자의조수궤수자표법분위연구조화대조조각61인。대조조응용길서타빈연합순박화료,연구조응용길서타빈연합오사리박화료。대비량조근기료효、무진전생존시간、치료전후적체질량여KPS평분、엄중불량반응발생정황。결과량조완해솔、공제솔、무진전생존시간무현저차이( P>0.05)。량조치료전체질량급KPS평분무현저차이(P>0.05),치료후량조체질량급KPS평분교치료전균현저개선(P<0.05),연구조체질량급KPS평분개선폭도현저우우대조조(P<0.05)。연구조엄중불량반응발생솔현저저우대조조(P<0.05)。결론만기비소세포폐암초치노령환자급여길서타빈연합오사리박무법제승근기료효,단가현저제고환자적체질급생존질량,독부반응경소。
Objective To compare and analyze the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine combined with different plati-num agents in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer in early stage. Methods 122 patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer who were diagnosed and treated in our hospital from March 2012 to January 2015,cases of non small cell lung cancer patients were randomly divided into study group and control group with 61 persons in each group. Control group was treated with gemcitabine plus Cisplatin chemotherapy,research group was treated with Gemcitabine plus Oxaliplatin chemotherapy regimens. Compared the short-term efficacy,progression free survival,and the quality of the body mass and KPS score,the incidence of serious adverse reactions before and after treatment of the two groups. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0. 05) in the remission rate,control rate and progression free survival (P>0. 05). There were no significant differences between the two groups before treatment (P>0. 05),the quality of the two groups and the KPS score were significantly improved after treatment (P<0. 05),the improvement of the quality of the study group and the improvement rate of KPS score were significantly better than those in the control group (P<0. 05). The incidence of serious adverse reactions in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0. 05). Conclusion Advanced non small cell lung cancer treatment in the elderly patients given gemcitabine combined with oxaliplatin can enhance the curative effect in the near future,but can significantly improve the health and quality of life of patients,with less toxicity.