中国社区医师
中國社區醫師
중국사구의사
Chinese Community Doctors
2015年
33期
60,62
,共2页
初戴疼痛%活动翼矫治器%直丝弓托槽
初戴疼痛%活動翼矯治器%直絲弓託槽
초대동통%활동익교치기%직사궁탁조
At the beginning of a pain%Movable wing appliance%Straight wire bracket
目的:比较活动翼矫治器与传统直丝弓托槽矫治器初戴后的疼痛强度及变化规律,为临床降低初戴疼痛提供依据.方法:选择活动翼矫治器矫治病例与传统直丝弓矫治病例各30例,常规粘接上半口矫治器,通过问卷调查表了解安放矫治器后7 d的疼痛强度并进行统计学分析.结果:活动翼矫治患者疼痛强度在3 d时小于传统直丝弓矫治器(P<0.05).4~7 d疼痛强度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:由于活动翼矫治器减小弓丝的形变量降低矫治力,明显减轻了初戴疼痛,较传统矫治器舒适.
目的:比較活動翼矯治器與傳統直絲弓託槽矯治器初戴後的疼痛彊度及變化規律,為臨床降低初戴疼痛提供依據.方法:選擇活動翼矯治器矯治病例與傳統直絲弓矯治病例各30例,常規粘接上半口矯治器,通過問捲調查錶瞭解安放矯治器後7 d的疼痛彊度併進行統計學分析.結果:活動翼矯治患者疼痛彊度在3 d時小于傳統直絲弓矯治器(P<0.05).4~7 d疼痛彊度差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論:由于活動翼矯治器減小弓絲的形變量降低矯治力,明顯減輕瞭初戴疼痛,較傳統矯治器舒適.
목적:비교활동익교치기여전통직사궁탁조교치기초대후적동통강도급변화규률,위림상강저초대동통제공의거.방법:선택활동익교치기교치병례여전통직사궁교치병례각30례,상규점접상반구교치기,통과문권조사표료해안방교치기후7 d적동통강도병진행통계학분석.결과:활동익교치환자동통강도재3 d시소우전통직사궁교치기(P<0.05).4~7 d동통강도차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론:유우활동익교치기감소궁사적형변량강저교치력,명현감경료초대동통,교전통교치기서괄.
Objective:Comparison of movable wing appliance and traditional straight wire bracket appliance worn after the pain intensity and variation,to provide the basis for clinical treatment to reduce the pain in the beginning.Methods:Choosing the activity wing appliance cases and the traditional straight wire appliance cases,30 cases in each,the conventional bonding on half a mouth appliance.The questionnaire was used to understand after appliance placement 7 days of pain intensity and statistical analysis. Results:Movable wing orthodontic patients pain intensity at 3 d less than that of the traditional straight wire appliance(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in pain intensity between 4~7 d(P>0.05).Conclusion:The movable wing appliance due to the reduced wire deformation reduces the orthodontic force significantly reduced early wearing slight pain,comparing with the traditional appliance,it is more comfort.
