中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
2015年
32期
3864-3866
,共3页
黄秀芹%诸葛玮玮%何敏%严超群%吴和
黃秀芹%諸葛瑋瑋%何敏%嚴超群%吳和
황수근%제갈위위%하민%엄초군%오화
护理风险管理%经内镜逆行性胰胆管造影术%并发症%满意度
護理風險管理%經內鏡逆行性胰膽管造影術%併髮癥%滿意度
호리풍험관리%경내경역행성이담관조영술%병발증%만의도
Nursing risk management%Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography%Complications%Satisfaction
目的:探讨护理风险管理对经内镜逆行性胰胆管造影术( ERCP)术后胰腺炎的预防效果。方法2012年8月—2014年7月选取温州医科大学附属第一医院行ERCP治疗的患者200例,按照所住院病区分为对照组和观察组,每组100例,对照组实行常规护理干预,观察组实行护理风险管理护理干预。比较两组患者ERCP术后胰腺炎的发生率和护理效果。结果观察组患者术后无一例发生胰腺炎,护理满意度99.0%;对照组胰腺炎发生率6.0%,护理满意度71.0%;两组比较差异有统计学意义(χ2值分别为6.19,31.75;P<0.05)。观察组患者住院时间为(6.8±2.5)d,对照组为(10.7±4.1)d,差异有统计学意义(t=6.45,P<0.05)。护理干预后观察组患者焦虑评分为(42.7±5.9)分,对照组为(53.2±7.1)分,差异有统计学意义(t=4.69,P<0.05)。结论护理风险管理能够降低患者ERCP术后胰腺炎发病率、缩短住院时间,改善焦虑水平,提高护理满意度。
目的:探討護理風險管理對經內鏡逆行性胰膽管造影術( ERCP)術後胰腺炎的預防效果。方法2012年8月—2014年7月選取溫州醫科大學附屬第一醫院行ERCP治療的患者200例,按照所住院病區分為對照組和觀察組,每組100例,對照組實行常規護理榦預,觀察組實行護理風險管理護理榦預。比較兩組患者ERCP術後胰腺炎的髮生率和護理效果。結果觀察組患者術後無一例髮生胰腺炎,護理滿意度99.0%;對照組胰腺炎髮生率6.0%,護理滿意度71.0%;兩組比較差異有統計學意義(χ2值分彆為6.19,31.75;P<0.05)。觀察組患者住院時間為(6.8±2.5)d,對照組為(10.7±4.1)d,差異有統計學意義(t=6.45,P<0.05)。護理榦預後觀察組患者焦慮評分為(42.7±5.9)分,對照組為(53.2±7.1)分,差異有統計學意義(t=4.69,P<0.05)。結論護理風險管理能夠降低患者ERCP術後胰腺炎髮病率、縮短住院時間,改善焦慮水平,提高護理滿意度。
목적:탐토호리풍험관리대경내경역행성이담관조영술( ERCP)술후이선염적예방효과。방법2012년8월—2014년7월선취온주의과대학부속제일의원행ERCP치료적환자200례,안조소주원병구분위대조조화관찰조,매조100례,대조조실행상규호리간예,관찰조실행호리풍험관리호리간예。비교량조환자ERCP술후이선염적발생솔화호리효과。결과관찰조환자술후무일례발생이선염,호리만의도99.0%;대조조이선염발생솔6.0%,호리만의도71.0%;량조비교차이유통계학의의(χ2치분별위6.19,31.75;P<0.05)。관찰조환자주원시간위(6.8±2.5)d,대조조위(10.7±4.1)d,차이유통계학의의(t=6.45,P<0.05)。호리간예후관찰조환자초필평분위(42.7±5.9)분,대조조위(53.2±7.1)분,차이유통계학의의(t=4.69,P<0.05)。결론호리풍험관리능구강저환자ERCP술후이선염발병솔、축단주원시간,개선초필수평,제고호리만의도。
Objective To study the preventive effect of nursing risks management for pancreatitis after ERCP. Methods From August 2012 to July 2014,a total of 200 patients treated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography ( ERCP) in our hospital were selected and divided into control group using the routine nursing intervention and observation group using the risk nursing management of nursing intervention. We compared the incidence of pancreatitis and nursing effects between two groups after ERCP. Results After operation, patients of observation group occurred no incidence of pancreatitis, while nursing satisfaction was 99. 0%; the incidence of pancreatitis was 6. 0% and nursing satisfaction was 71. 0% in the control group (χ2 =6. 19, 31. 75;P<0. 05). After nursing interventions, the length of hospitalization was (6. 8 ± 2. 5)d in the observation group compared (10.7 ±4.1)d in the control group (t=6.45, P<0.05). The anxiety score in the observation group was (42. 7 ± 5. 9), lower than (53. 2 ± 7. 1) in the control group (t=4. 69, P < 0. 05 ). Conclusions The nursing risks management can significantly reduce the incidence of pancreatitis after ERCP and the total incidence of complications, shorten the hospitalization time of patients, improve the patient′s level of anxiety and the patients′satisfaction of nursing.