中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
2015年
32期
3882-3884
,共3页
全程综合护理%急诊科%脑外伤%院内转运
全程綜閤護理%急診科%腦外傷%院內轉運
전정종합호리%급진과%뇌외상%원내전운
Full process comprehensive nursing%Emergency Department%Brain trauma%Hospital transport
目的：探讨全程综合护理干预在急诊脑外伤患者院内转运中的临床效果。方法对我院收治的100例急诊脑外伤患者进行回顾性分析。2012年6月—2013年5月收治的50例患者作为对照组,接受常规院内转运护理；2013年6月—2014年5月收治的50例患者作为观察组,接受全程综合护理干预。比较两组患者转运时间、检查等待时间、转运不良事件发生率及接收科室满意度。结果观察组转运中不良事件发生率为4.00%,显著低于对照组的16.00%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.000,P <0.05)；观察组转运时间、检查等待时间为(10.54±4.47),(0.44±0.19)min,对照组分别是(16.43±5.21),(1.57±0.26)min,差异有统计学意义(t分别为6.067,24.813；P<0.05)；观察组转运科室满意度满意率为96.00%,显著高于对照组的84.00%(χ2=4.000,P<0.05)。结论全程综合护理干预缩短了急诊脑外伤患者院内转运时间及检查等待时间,减少了院内转运中不良事件的发生,提高了科室满意度,值得临床重视。
目的：探討全程綜閤護理榦預在急診腦外傷患者院內轉運中的臨床效果。方法對我院收治的100例急診腦外傷患者進行迴顧性分析。2012年6月—2013年5月收治的50例患者作為對照組,接受常規院內轉運護理；2013年6月—2014年5月收治的50例患者作為觀察組,接受全程綜閤護理榦預。比較兩組患者轉運時間、檢查等待時間、轉運不良事件髮生率及接收科室滿意度。結果觀察組轉運中不良事件髮生率為4.00%,顯著低于對照組的16.00%,差異有統計學意義(χ2=4.000,P <0.05)；觀察組轉運時間、檢查等待時間為(10.54±4.47),(0.44±0.19)min,對照組分彆是(16.43±5.21),(1.57±0.26)min,差異有統計學意義(t分彆為6.067,24.813；P<0.05)；觀察組轉運科室滿意度滿意率為96.00%,顯著高于對照組的84.00%(χ2=4.000,P<0.05)。結論全程綜閤護理榦預縮短瞭急診腦外傷患者院內轉運時間及檢查等待時間,減少瞭院內轉運中不良事件的髮生,提高瞭科室滿意度,值得臨床重視。
목적：탐토전정종합호리간예재급진뇌외상환자원내전운중적림상효과。방법대아원수치적100례급진뇌외상환자진행회고성분석。2012년6월—2013년5월수치적50례환자작위대조조,접수상규원내전운호리；2013년6월—2014년5월수치적50례환자작위관찰조,접수전정종합호리간예。비교량조환자전운시간、검사등대시간、전운불량사건발생솔급접수과실만의도。결과관찰조전운중불량사건발생솔위4.00%,현저저우대조조적16.00%,차이유통계학의의(χ2=4.000,P <0.05)；관찰조전운시간、검사등대시간위(10.54±4.47),(0.44±0.19)min,대조조분별시(16.43±5.21),(1.57±0.26)min,차이유통계학의의(t분별위6.067,24.813；P<0.05)；관찰조전운과실만의도만의솔위96.00%,현저고우대조조적84.00%(χ2=4.000,P<0.05)。결론전정종합호리간예축단료급진뇌외상환자원내전운시간급검사등대시간,감소료원내전운중불량사건적발생,제고료과실만의도,치득림상중시。
Objective To investigate the effects of full process comprehensive nursing on the transport of emergent and brain trauma patients. Methods A total of 100 brain trauma patients in Emergency Department accepted retrospective analysis, in which 50 patients received routine transport nursing from June 2012 to May 2013 in our hospital as control group while 50 cases accepted full process comprehensive nursing intervention from June 2013 to May 2014 as observation group. We compared the transit time, check the waiting time, transport rates of adverse events and receiving departments′ satisfaction between the two groups. Results The incidence rate of adverse transfer event was 4% in the observation group, which was significantly lower than that in the control group (16%) (χ2 =4. 000,P <0. 05). The transit time, check the waiting time in the observation group were (10. 54 ± 4. 47) min and (0. 44 ± 0. 19) min, which were lower than these of the control group [(16.43 ±5.21)min and (1.57 ±0.26)min], (t=6.067, 24.813;P<0.05); the receiving transport departments′ satisfaction rate of observation group was 96%, significantly higher than that in the control group which was 84% (χ2 =4. 000,P<0. 05). Conclusions For emergency brain trauma patients, full process comprehensive nursing intervention can reduce the time of transiting and waiting for check. It also can reduce the occurrence of adverse events in hospital transport and improve receiving departments′satisfaction, so it is worthy of clinical attention.
