心血管康复医学杂志
心血管康複醫學雜誌
심혈관강복의학잡지
Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Medicine
2015年
6期
606-609,610
,共5页
宋伟%崔惠康%郑玉水%陈振岭%徐欣%唐亮%朱坤
宋偉%崔惠康%鄭玉水%陳振嶺%徐訢%唐亮%硃坤
송위%최혜강%정옥수%진진령%서흔%당량%주곤
HSP70热休克蛋白质类%心脏起搏 ,人工%心房颤动%钾通道 ,钙激活
HSP70熱休剋蛋白質類%心髒起搏 ,人工%心房顫動%鉀通道 ,鈣激活
HSP70열휴극단백질류%심장기박 ,인공%심방전동%갑통도 ,개격활
Heart-shock proteins 70%Cardiac pacing,artificial%Atrial fibrillation%Potassium channels,calcium-activated
目的:观察热应激诱导心肌热休克蛋白(HSP )70表达上调,对兔快速心房起搏致房颤心肌钙激活钾通道(KCa )3.1表达的影响。方法:将24只新西兰大白兔随机分为假手术组(n=8,仅植入电极而不起博)、起搏组(n=8,以600次/min快速起搏右心房6h)和热应激起搏组(热应激组,n=8,先行热应激预处理,再行与起搏组一样的快速起搏)。结果:与假手术组和起搏组比较,热应激组心脏各部位 HSP70mRNA和蛋白表达显著上调[HSP70蛋白,左房:(39.00±3.21)比(39.75±2.82)比(69.75±3.45),右房:(38.38±2.92)比(39.50±3.89)比(69.00±2.93),左心耳:(37.75±3.28)比(39.00±3.89)比(68.63±3.23),右心耳:(37.00±3.85)比(38.38±3.74)比(68.75±2.82)], P均<0.01,而起搏组和假手术组间无显著性差异(P>0.05);与起搏组KCa 3.1 mRNA和蛋白表达量显著下调比较,热应激组心脏各部位KCa 3.1 mRNA和蛋白表达量显著上调[KCa 3.1蛋白,左房:(21.25±1.67)比(24.00±2.62),右房:(21.13±1.96)比(23.75±1.83),左心耳:(21.00±2.07)比(23.75±1.67),右心耳:(20.88±2.03)比(23.50±2.45)], P均<0.05,且热应激组与假手术组间无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论:热应激可诱导心房起搏心肌热休克蛋白(HSP)70表达上调,抑制KCa 3.1 mRNA和蛋白表达量显著下降。
目的:觀察熱應激誘導心肌熱休剋蛋白(HSP )70錶達上調,對兔快速心房起搏緻房顫心肌鈣激活鉀通道(KCa )3.1錶達的影響。方法:將24隻新西蘭大白兔隨機分為假手術組(n=8,僅植入電極而不起博)、起搏組(n=8,以600次/min快速起搏右心房6h)和熱應激起搏組(熱應激組,n=8,先行熱應激預處理,再行與起搏組一樣的快速起搏)。結果:與假手術組和起搏組比較,熱應激組心髒各部位 HSP70mRNA和蛋白錶達顯著上調[HSP70蛋白,左房:(39.00±3.21)比(39.75±2.82)比(69.75±3.45),右房:(38.38±2.92)比(39.50±3.89)比(69.00±2.93),左心耳:(37.75±3.28)比(39.00±3.89)比(68.63±3.23),右心耳:(37.00±3.85)比(38.38±3.74)比(68.75±2.82)], P均<0.01,而起搏組和假手術組間無顯著性差異(P>0.05);與起搏組KCa 3.1 mRNA和蛋白錶達量顯著下調比較,熱應激組心髒各部位KCa 3.1 mRNA和蛋白錶達量顯著上調[KCa 3.1蛋白,左房:(21.25±1.67)比(24.00±2.62),右房:(21.13±1.96)比(23.75±1.83),左心耳:(21.00±2.07)比(23.75±1.67),右心耳:(20.88±2.03)比(23.50±2.45)], P均<0.05,且熱應激組與假手術組間無顯著差異(P>0.05)。結論:熱應激可誘導心房起搏心肌熱休剋蛋白(HSP)70錶達上調,抑製KCa 3.1 mRNA和蛋白錶達量顯著下降。
목적:관찰열응격유도심기열휴극단백(HSP )70표체상조,대토쾌속심방기박치방전심기개격활갑통도(KCa )3.1표체적영향。방법:장24지신서란대백토수궤분위가수술조(n=8,부식입전겁이불기박)、기박조(n=8,이600차/min쾌속기박우심방6h)화열응격기박조(열응격조,n=8,선행열응격예처리,재행여기박조일양적쾌속기박)。결과:여가수술조화기박조비교,열응격조심장각부위 HSP70mRNA화단백표체현저상조[HSP70단백,좌방:(39.00±3.21)비(39.75±2.82)비(69.75±3.45),우방:(38.38±2.92)비(39.50±3.89)비(69.00±2.93),좌심이:(37.75±3.28)비(39.00±3.89)비(68.63±3.23),우심이:(37.00±3.85)비(38.38±3.74)비(68.75±2.82)], P균<0.01,이기박조화가수술조간무현저성차이(P>0.05);여기박조KCa 3.1 mRNA화단백표체량현저하조비교,열응격조심장각부위KCa 3.1 mRNA화단백표체량현저상조[KCa 3.1단백,좌방:(21.25±1.67)비(24.00±2.62),우방:(21.13±1.96)비(23.75±1.83),좌심이:(21.00±2.07)비(23.75±1.67),우심이:(20.88±2.03)비(23.50±2.45)], P균<0.05,차열응격조여가수술조간무현저차이(P>0.05)。결론:열응격가유도심방기박심기열휴극단백(HSP)70표체상조,억제KCa 3.1 mRNA화단백표체량현저하강。
Objective:To observe influence of up‐regulated expression of myocardial heat shock protein (HSP) 70 in‐duced by heat stress on myocardial calcium‐activated potassium channel (KCa ) 3.1 expression in rabbits with atrial fibrillation (AF) caused by rapid atrial pacing (RAP) .Methods :A total of 24 New Zealand white rabbits were ran‐domly divided into sham operation group (n=8 ,only implant electrode without pacing ) ,pacing group (n=8 ,right atrium (RA) received RAP at 600 times/min for 6h) and heat stress pacing group (heat stress group ,n=8 ,received heat stress preconditioning ,then the same RAP as pacing group ) .Results:Compared with sham operation group and pacing group ,there were significant up‐regulation of HSP70 mRNA and protein expression in different sites of heart [HSP70 protein ,left atrium (LA):(39.00 ± 3.21) vs .(39.75 ± 2.82) vs .(69.75 ± 3.45) ,RA: (38.38 ± 2.92) vs .(39.50 ± 3.89) vs .(69.00 ± 2.93) ,left atrial appendage (LAA):(37.75 ± 3.28) vs .(39.00 ± 3.89) vs . (68.63 ± 3.23) ,right atrial appendage (RAA): (37.00 ± 3.85) vs .(38.38 ± 3.74) vs .(68.75 ± 2.82)] in heat stress group , P<0. 01 all ,but there were no significant difference between pacing group and sham operation group , P>0.05 ;compared with pacing group with down‐regulation of KCa3.1 mRNA and protein expressions ,there were significant up‐regulation of KCa3.1 mRNA and protein expressions in different sites of heart [KCa3.1 protein ,LA:(21.25 ± 1.67) vs .(24.00 ± 2.62) ,RA :(21.13 ± 1.96) vs .(23.75 ± 1.83) ,LAA :(21.00 ± 2.07) vs .(23.75 ± 1.67) ,RAA:(20.88 ± 2.03) vs .(23.50 ± 2.45)] in heat stress group ,P<0.05 all ,and there were no significant difference between heat stress group and sham operation group , P>0. 05. Conclusion:Heat stress may induce up‐regulated expression of myocardial HSP 70 of myocardium ,and HSP 70 may inhibit down‐regulation of KCa 3. 1 mR‐NA and protein expressions in rabbits with atrial fibrillation.