贵州大学学报(社会科学版)
貴州大學學報(社會科學版)
귀주대학학보(사회과학판)
Journal of Guizhou University (Social Science)
2015年
6期
18-24
,共7页
工具%绝对知识%先验逻辑%同一性
工具%絕對知識%先驗邏輯%同一性
공구%절대지식%선험라집%동일성
instrument%absolute knowledge%transcendental logic%identity
本文以黑格尔的工具隐喻为切入点,分析了其对近代认识理论的批判和超越。相对于知识本身而言,认识理论乃是对认识手段和认识过程的考察,因此是直接建立在认识工具的预设之上的。黑格尔指出了这个预设以及其中所包含的问题,即认识手段与认识对象的分离、认识过程与知识本身的分离,对传统的认识理论进行了彻底地分析和批判。黑格尔将康德哲学作为认识论悖论典型的发生场所,却在一定程度上忽略了康德的先验哲学与普通的工具论的差别,也忽略了康德在克服工具论的方向上所做出的努力。事实上,康德的先验逻辑这一特殊“工具”已经在一定程度上与传统工具论区别开来,其先验统觉所包含的统一性学说,为黑格尔通过绝对知识来最终克服认识论的内在悖论做了准备。
本文以黑格爾的工具隱喻為切入點,分析瞭其對近代認識理論的批判和超越。相對于知識本身而言,認識理論迺是對認識手段和認識過程的攷察,因此是直接建立在認識工具的預設之上的。黑格爾指齣瞭這箇預設以及其中所包含的問題,即認識手段與認識對象的分離、認識過程與知識本身的分離,對傳統的認識理論進行瞭徹底地分析和批判。黑格爾將康德哲學作為認識論悖論典型的髮生場所,卻在一定程度上忽略瞭康德的先驗哲學與普通的工具論的差彆,也忽略瞭康德在剋服工具論的方嚮上所做齣的努力。事實上,康德的先驗邏輯這一特殊“工具”已經在一定程度上與傳統工具論區彆開來,其先驗統覺所包含的統一性學說,為黑格爾通過絕對知識來最終剋服認識論的內在悖論做瞭準備。
본문이흑격이적공구은유위절입점,분석료기대근대인식이론적비판화초월。상대우지식본신이언,인식이론내시대인식수단화인식과정적고찰,인차시직접건립재인식공구적예설지상적。흑격이지출료저개예설이급기중소포함적문제,즉인식수단여인식대상적분리、인식과정여지식본신적분리,대전통적인식이론진행료철저지분석화비판。흑격이장강덕철학작위인식론패론전형적발생장소,각재일정정도상홀략료강덕적선험철학여보통적공구론적차별,야홀략료강덕재극복공구론적방향상소주출적노력。사실상,강덕적선험라집저일특수“공구”이경재일정정도상여전통공구론구별개래,기선험통각소포함적통일성학설,위흑격이통과절대지식래최종극복인식론적내재패론주료준비。
With Hegel’ s metaphor of instrument as an entry point, the present paper analyses its criticism and transcendence of modern epistemology. Related to the knowledge itself, epistemology is the investigation of cognitive means and cognitive process, and therefore it is directly based on the presupposition of cognitive instru-ment. Hegel pointed out this presupposition and the problems contained therein and separated cognitive means from cognitive object, and cognitive process from knowledge itself, which in fact has analyzed and criticized the traditional epistemology thoroughly. Hegel treated Kantian philosophy as a typical place where the epistemological antinomy occurs. However, to a certain extent, he ignored not only the difference between Kant’ s transcendental philosophy and general instrument theory but also the efforts to overcome instrument theory that Kant made. In fact, Kant’ s transcendental logic as a special“instrument” has been distinguished to some extent with the tradi-tional instrument theory, and its transcendental apprehension, which contains totality theory, has made prepara-tions for Hegel by means of absolute knowledge eventually to overcome the epistemological inherent antinomy.