昆明学院学报
昆明學院學報
곤명학원학보
Journal of Kunming University
2015年
5期
59-70
,共12页
逻各斯-道%逻辑%哲学对象论%哲学判断论%哲学逻辑论
邏各斯-道%邏輯%哲學對象論%哲學判斷論%哲學邏輯論
라각사-도%라집%철학대상론%철학판단론%철학라집론
Logos-Tao%logic%the theory of philosophical object%the theory of philosophical judgment%the theory of philosophical logic
以2500多年前赫拉克利特的“辩证法”和老子的“道论”及与其相对立的巴门尼德的“存在论”为起始,回顾了从自然语言形态的“逻各斯-道”到数理语言形态的“逻辑”,再回归于自然语言形态(内含数理语言形态)的“逻各斯-道”之“否定之否定”的大致历程。说明西方形式逻辑的一致性根源于“存在或非在”,东方辩证逻辑的完全性根源于“正者且反者”,从而孕育出了断无矛盾的形式逻辑和指有矛盾的辩证逻辑,可以将这两种逻辑的“一致性”和“完全性”互补结合起来,以形成“指有辩证矛盾”与“断无逻辑矛盾”的新形态的哲学逻辑理论———这就为哲学逻辑之进化历程,找到了合理的解释。
以2500多年前赫拉剋利特的“辯證法”和老子的“道論”及與其相對立的巴門尼德的“存在論”為起始,迴顧瞭從自然語言形態的“邏各斯-道”到數理語言形態的“邏輯”,再迴歸于自然語言形態(內含數理語言形態)的“邏各斯-道”之“否定之否定”的大緻歷程。說明西方形式邏輯的一緻性根源于“存在或非在”,東方辯證邏輯的完全性根源于“正者且反者”,從而孕育齣瞭斷無矛盾的形式邏輯和指有矛盾的辯證邏輯,可以將這兩種邏輯的“一緻性”和“完全性”互補結閤起來,以形成“指有辯證矛盾”與“斷無邏輯矛盾”的新形態的哲學邏輯理論———這就為哲學邏輯之進化歷程,找到瞭閤理的解釋。
이2500다년전혁랍극리특적“변증법”화노자적“도론”급여기상대립적파문니덕적“존재론”위기시,회고료종자연어언형태적“라각사-도”도수리어언형태적“라집”,재회귀우자연어언형태(내함수리어언형태)적“라각사-도”지“부정지부정”적대치역정。설명서방형식라집적일치성근원우“존재혹비재”,동방변증라집적완전성근원우“정자차반자”,종이잉육출료단무모순적형식라집화지유모순적변증라집,가이장저량충라집적“일치성”화“완전성”호보결합기래,이형성“지유변증모순”여“단무라집모순”적신형태적철학라집이론———저취위철학라집지진화역정,조도료합리적해석。
The brief process from the Logos-Tao of natural language to logic of mathematical language and then to the double negation of Logos-Tao which belongs to natural language (involving mathematical language)conversely is introduced with the beginning of dialectics by Heraclitus,Tao by Laozi and then oppositely ontology by Parmenides before 2500 years.It shows that the consistency from western formal logic and origins from existence and non-existence,and the completeness from orient dialectical logic origins from position and negation and then formal logic of affirmative non-contradiction and dialectical logic of signified contradictive.The consistency and com-pleteness of the two logics can be complemented and combined for the new theory of philosophical logic with signified dialectical contra-diction and assertive non-logical contradiction.This provides rational explanation for the evolution of philosophical logic.