作物学报
作物學報
작물학보
Acta Agronomica Sinica
2016年
1期
70-81
,共12页
徐云姬%李银银%钱希旸%王志琴%杨建昌
徐雲姬%李銀銀%錢希旸%王誌琴%楊建昌
서운희%리은은%전희양%왕지금%양건창
淀粉粒%形态%粒度分布%强势粒%弱势粒%水稻%小麦%玉米
澱粉粒%形態%粒度分佈%彊勢粒%弱勢粒%水稻%小麥%玉米
정분립%형태%립도분포%강세립%약세립%수도%소맥%옥미
Starch granule%Morphology%Size distribution%Superior grains%Inferior grains%Rice%Wheat%Maize
本研究以水稻品种武运粳24和扬两优6号、小麦品种扬麦16和宁麦13及玉米品种登海11和农乐988为试验材料,分别提取其成熟期强、弱势粒的淀粉粒,观察比较不同作物及其强、弱势粒间淀粉粒形态和淀粉粒数量、体积和表面积分布特性。结果表明,3种禾谷类作物间淀粉粒形态大小差异明显,粒径表现为玉米>小麦>水稻。水稻淀粉粒呈有棱角的无规则状,小麦淀粉粒呈透镜体状或球体状,玉米淀粉粒呈椭球体状、多面体状或圆球体状。水稻和玉米淀粉粒数量、体积和表面积分别成单峰、三峰和双峰分布;小麦淀粉粒数量呈单峰分布,体积呈微弱的四峰分布,表面积呈三峰分布。水稻、小麦和玉米淀粉粒按各自粒径不同人为划分为小淀粉粒、中淀粉粒和大淀粉粒,分界线分别为1.5μm和20.0μm、5.0μm和50.0μm、4.0μm和50.0μm。3种作物籽粒淀粉粒的总体积主要决定于中淀粉粒体积。3种作物的强、弱势粒间小淀粉粒粒度分布比例及中淀粉粒所占数量比例没有明显差异,但各作物强势粒的中淀粉粒所占的体积和表面积比例均显著高于弱势粒,大淀粉粒的分布比例低于弱势粒。强、弱势粒的中淀粉粒所占体积比例与其淀粉积累量和粒重的高低变化趋势一致。表明淀粉粒体积是决定粒重的一个重要因素,增加弱势粒的中淀粉粒体积或减小大淀粉粒体积可望增加其粒重。
本研究以水稻品種武運粳24和颺兩優6號、小麥品種颺麥16和寧麥13及玉米品種登海11和農樂988為試驗材料,分彆提取其成熟期彊、弱勢粒的澱粉粒,觀察比較不同作物及其彊、弱勢粒間澱粉粒形態和澱粉粒數量、體積和錶麵積分佈特性。結果錶明,3種禾穀類作物間澱粉粒形態大小差異明顯,粒徑錶現為玉米>小麥>水稻。水稻澱粉粒呈有稜角的無規則狀,小麥澱粉粒呈透鏡體狀或毬體狀,玉米澱粉粒呈橢毬體狀、多麵體狀或圓毬體狀。水稻和玉米澱粉粒數量、體積和錶麵積分彆成單峰、三峰和雙峰分佈;小麥澱粉粒數量呈單峰分佈,體積呈微弱的四峰分佈,錶麵積呈三峰分佈。水稻、小麥和玉米澱粉粒按各自粒徑不同人為劃分為小澱粉粒、中澱粉粒和大澱粉粒,分界線分彆為1.5μm和20.0μm、5.0μm和50.0μm、4.0μm和50.0μm。3種作物籽粒澱粉粒的總體積主要決定于中澱粉粒體積。3種作物的彊、弱勢粒間小澱粉粒粒度分佈比例及中澱粉粒所佔數量比例沒有明顯差異,但各作物彊勢粒的中澱粉粒所佔的體積和錶麵積比例均顯著高于弱勢粒,大澱粉粒的分佈比例低于弱勢粒。彊、弱勢粒的中澱粉粒所佔體積比例與其澱粉積纍量和粒重的高低變化趨勢一緻。錶明澱粉粒體積是決定粒重的一箇重要因素,增加弱勢粒的中澱粉粒體積或減小大澱粉粒體積可望增加其粒重。
본연구이수도품충무운갱24화양량우6호、소맥품충양맥16화저맥13급옥미품충등해11화농악988위시험재료,분별제취기성숙기강、약세립적정분립,관찰비교불동작물급기강、약세립간정분립형태화정분립수량、체적화표면적분포특성。결과표명,3충화곡류작물간정분립형태대소차이명현,립경표현위옥미>소맥>수도。수도정분립정유릉각적무규칙상,소맥정분립정투경체상혹구체상,옥미정분립정타구체상、다면체상혹원구체상。수도화옥미정분립수량、체적화표면적분별성단봉、삼봉화쌍봉분포;소맥정분립수량정단봉분포,체적정미약적사봉분포,표면적정삼봉분포。수도、소맥화옥미정분립안각자립경불동인위화분위소정분립、중정분립화대정분립,분계선분별위1.5μm화20.0μm、5.0μm화50.0μm、4.0μm화50.0μm。3충작물자립정분립적총체적주요결정우중정분립체적。3충작물적강、약세립간소정분립립도분포비례급중정분립소점수량비례몰유명현차이,단각작물강세립적중정분립소점적체적화표면적비례균현저고우약세립,대정분립적분포비례저우약세립。강、약세립적중정분립소점체적비례여기정분적루량화립중적고저변화추세일치。표명정분립체적시결정립중적일개중요인소,증가약세립적중정분립체적혹감소대정분립체적가망증가기립중。
Using two rice cultivars, two wheat cultivars, and two maize cultivars, we extracted starch granules to observe the morphological characteristics and to compare the differences in the starch granule number, volume and surface area distributions among the three crops and between superior and inferior grains of each cultivar. The results showed that significant differences were observed in starch granule morphology and size among the three crops. The diameter of starch granule showed an order of maize > wheat > rice. Starch granules extracted in rice showed an irregular shape, the starch granules in wheat were lenticu-lar-shaped and spherical-shaped. The starch granules in maize grain were mainly polyhedral or irregular and spherical in shape. Distributions of starch granule number, volume and surface area were changed in a typical unimodal-peak curve, a triple-peak curve and a typical bimodal-peak curve, respectively, in grains of rice and maize. Distributions of starch granule number, volume and surface area in wheat grains displayed a typical unimodal-peak curve, a four-peak curve and a triple-peak curve, respectively. According to starch granule diameters, all the starch granules were classified into small, medium, and large granules in this study. The thresholds for separating the starch granules were 1.5μm and 20.0μm, 5.0μm and 50.0μm, 4.0μm and 50.0μm, respec-tively, in rice, wheat and maize. The total volume of starch granules in grains of the three cereal crops was mainly determined by the volume of medium starch granules. No significant difference was observed in the proportions of small starch granule size and medium starch granule number between superior and inferior grains of the three cereal crops. But the volume and surface area of medium starch granules were larger in superior grains than in inferior ones. The percentage of large starch granules was greater in the inferior than in the superior. Changes in the volume of medium starch granules in both superior and inferior grains were con-sistent with those in starch accumulation and grain weight. The results suggest that the starch granule volume is an important fac-tor determining grain weight. Increasing the volume of medium starch granules or reducing the volume of large starch granules would increase the weight of inferior grains.