新疆医学
新疆醫學
신강의학
Xinjiang Medical Journal
2015年
11期
1625-1627
,共3页
吴新%黄玮%黄雪花%邓文强
吳新%黃瑋%黃雪花%鄧文彊
오신%황위%황설화%산문강
经皮前路%椎间孔镜%颈椎间盘%髓核摘除
經皮前路%椎間孔鏡%頸椎間盤%髓覈摘除
경피전로%추간공경%경추간반%수핵적제
Anterior percutanous%Endoscopic%Cervical intervertebral disc%Discectomy
目的 探讨经皮前路椎间孔镜下颈椎间盘髓核摘除术(anterior percutanous endoscopic cervical discectomy,APECD)安全性及临床疗效.方法 选择用APECD治疗的31例患者.术前及术后3 d及l,3,6个月分别行视觉模拟评分 (visual ana-logue scale,VAS)评分.术后6个月行MRI检查.所有评分数据收集后使用SPASS13.0软件分析.结果 31例患者均获得随访.术后3 d VAS评分较术前有改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后1,3,6个月VAS评分较术前有明显改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);术后3 d与术后1,3,6个月VAS评分比较有差异且有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后第l,3,6个月之间的VAS评分有差异但无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 经皮前路椎间孔镜下颈椎间盘髓核摘除术治疗颈椎间盘突出具有良好的疗效.
目的 探討經皮前路椎間孔鏡下頸椎間盤髓覈摘除術(anterior percutanous endoscopic cervical discectomy,APECD)安全性及臨床療效.方法 選擇用APECD治療的31例患者.術前及術後3 d及l,3,6箇月分彆行視覺模擬評分 (visual ana-logue scale,VAS)評分.術後6箇月行MRI檢查.所有評分數據收集後使用SPASS13.0軟件分析.結果 31例患者均穫得隨訪.術後3 d VAS評分較術前有改善,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);術後1,3,6箇月VAS評分較術前有明顯改善,差異有統計學意義(P<0.01);術後3 d與術後1,3,6箇月VAS評分比較有差異且有統計學意義(P<0.05);術後第l,3,6箇月之間的VAS評分有差異但無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論 經皮前路椎間孔鏡下頸椎間盤髓覈摘除術治療頸椎間盤突齣具有良好的療效.
목적 탐토경피전로추간공경하경추간반수핵적제술(anterior percutanous endoscopic cervical discectomy,APECD)안전성급림상료효.방법 선택용APECD치료적31례환자.술전급술후3 d급l,3,6개월분별행시각모의평분 (visual ana-logue scale,VAS)평분.술후6개월행MRI검사.소유평분수거수집후사용SPASS13.0연건분석.결과 31례환자균획득수방.술후3 d VAS평분교술전유개선,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);술후1,3,6개월VAS평분교술전유명현개선,차이유통계학의의(P<0.01);술후3 d여술후1,3,6개월VAS평분비교유차이차유통계학의의(P<0.05);술후제l,3,6개월지간적VAS평분유차이단무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론 경피전로추간공경하경추간반수핵적제술치료경추간반돌출구유량호적료효.
Objective To evaluate the safety and clinical curative effect of anterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy (APECD). Methods The study involved 31 patients undergone APECD.Visual analogue scale (VAS) was recorded before operation and at 3 days,1,3and 6 months after operation.In addition,MRI examination was conducted at postoperative 6 months.After data collection, SPASS13.0 software was performed. Results Follow-up was achieved in 31 patients.When compared to the preoperative score,VAS scale presented improvement at postoperative 3 days (P<0.05)and great improvement at postoperative 1,3and 6months (P<0.01) ,the differences ware statistically significant;Postoperative day 3 and 1,3,6 months after the score is differ,and there is statistical significance (P<0.05);Postoperative VAS score between 1,3,6 months there are some differences but without statistical significance (P>0.05). Conclusion APECD is effective in treatment of cervicalsoft or partial hard disc herniation.