中国实用医刊
中國實用醫刊
중국실용의간
Chinese Journal of Practical Medicine
2015年
24期
6-8
,共3页
消化道肿瘤%健康教育%问卷
消化道腫瘤%健康教育%問捲
소화도종류%건강교육%문권
Gastrointestinal cancer%Health education%Questionnaire
目的 评价晋中市农村消化道肿瘤高发区开展健康教育干预效果.方法 采用问卷式调查方式,对晋中市5县市农村消化道肿瘤高发区居民的营养状况、饮食、卫生习惯等进行调查,并分析其发生与年龄结构、知识结构等的关系,调查发现在消化道肿瘤高发年龄组或年龄相近组的不利因素较多,且接受健康教育的程度较差.采用多阶段随机分层抽样的方法开展健康教育,对干预效果进行评价.结果 干预后调查对象对恶性肿瘤防治相关知识的得分情况与干预前比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01);肿瘤高发年龄组(60 ～ 65岁)与高发年龄相近组(66 ～ 69岁)干预前后比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01),干预后干预组各项健康行为形成率均高于干预前(P＜0.01)及对照组.结论 经健康教育后,调查对象对肿瘤发病危险因素的掌握程度明显提高.
目的 評價晉中市農村消化道腫瘤高髮區開展健康教育榦預效果.方法 採用問捲式調查方式,對晉中市5縣市農村消化道腫瘤高髮區居民的營養狀況、飲食、衛生習慣等進行調查,併分析其髮生與年齡結構、知識結構等的關繫,調查髮現在消化道腫瘤高髮年齡組或年齡相近組的不利因素較多,且接受健康教育的程度較差.採用多階段隨機分層抽樣的方法開展健康教育,對榦預效果進行評價.結果 榦預後調查對象對噁性腫瘤防治相關知識的得分情況與榦預前比較差異有統計學意義(P＜0.01);腫瘤高髮年齡組(60 ～ 65歲)與高髮年齡相近組(66 ～ 69歲)榦預前後比較差異有統計學意義(P＜0.01),榦預後榦預組各項健康行為形成率均高于榦預前(P＜0.01)及對照組.結論 經健康教育後,調查對象對腫瘤髮病危險因素的掌握程度明顯提高.
목적 평개진중시농촌소화도종류고발구개전건강교육간예효과.방법 채용문권식조사방식,대진중시5현시농촌소화도종류고발구거민적영양상황、음식、위생습관등진행조사,병분석기발생여년령결구、지식결구등적관계,조사발현재소화도종류고발년령조혹년령상근조적불리인소교다,차접수건강교육적정도교차.채용다계단수궤분층추양적방법개전건강교육,대간예효과진행평개.결과 간예후조사대상대악성종류방치상관지식적득분정황여간예전비교차이유통계학의의(P＜0.01);종류고발년령조(60 ～ 65세)여고발년령상근조(66 ～ 69세)간예전후비교차이유통계학의의(P＜0.01),간예후간예조각항건강행위형성솔균고우간예전(P＜0.01)급대조조.결론 경건강교육후,조사대상대종류발병위험인소적장악정도명현제고.
Objective To evaluate the intervention effect of health education of residents in the high incidence areas for gastrointestinal tumors of Jinzhong.Methods With the investigation of questionnaire survey, the nutrition, diet, health habits on the survey subjects from the high-incidence areas for gastrointestinal tumors of Jinzhong were surveyed, the relationship between knowledge structure, age structure and the occurrence of gastrointestinal tumors were analyzed.To evaluate the intervention effect of health education with stratified multistage radom sampling method.Results The difference of the knowledge scores of prevent gastrointestinal cancer had statistical significance before and after intervention (P ＜0.01), the difference between the high peak age group(60-65 years old) and high peak similar age group(66-69 years old) had statistical significance before and after intervention(P ＜ 0.01).After intervention, the health behavior formation rate in intervention group was higher than that before intervention (P ＜ 0.01) and control group.Conclusions After health education, the mastery of the risk factors for cancer incidence is significantly improved.
