目的 研究前降支病变冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病(冠心病)患者接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)对侧支循环及心功能的影响.方法 选取2011年3月至2013年7月南京明基医院接受冠状动脉造影诊断为前降支单支病变的246例冠心病患者作为研究对象,根据侧支循环开放情况将患者分为侧支循环组(105例)和无侧支循环组(141例),侧支循环组患者再根据血流来源分为对侧侧支循环组(58例)、同侧+对侧侧支循环组(26例)、同侧侧支循环组(21例).比较各组患者PCI治疗前后心功能指标[左心室射血分数(LVEF)、左心室舒张末期容积(LVEDV)、B型钠尿肽(BNP)和红细胞体积分布宽度(RDW)]差异.结果 侧支循环组和无侧支循环组患者在年龄、性别、高血压、糖尿病及吸烟史方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).侧支循环组与无侧支循环组患者术前及术后1、6个月心功能指标分别为[侧支循环组LVEF:(45.7±9.8)%、(46.6±0.4)%、(47.4±0.4)%,LVEDV:(48.36±6.82)、(48.67±0.28)、(53.12±0.32) ml, BNP: (6.32±1.59)、(5.72±0.08)、(5.59±0.07) ng/L, RDW:(14.59±1.68)%、(13.75±0.07)%、(13.56±0.13)%;无侧支循环组LVEF:(43.6±8.8)%、(45.4±0 3)%、(46.3±0.3)% ,LVEDV: (48.51 ±5.36)、(48.87 ±0.26)、(55.36±0.38) ml, BNP: (6.39±1.27)、(6.21±0.09)、(6.05±0.06) ng/L, RDW:(14.86±1.87)%、(14.41±0.09)%、(13.76±0.12)%],2组患者术前各指标差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),侧支循环组患者术后1个月的LVEF、BNP、RDW水平及术后6个月时的LVEF、BNP、LVEDV、RDW水平与无侧支循环组患者比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).对侧侧支循环组、同侧+对侧侧支循环组、同侧侧支循环组患者术前及术后l、6个月心功能指标分别为[对侧侧支循环组LVEF:(46.0±8.9)%、(47.7±0.4)%、(48.0±0.4)%,LVEDV: (48.03±7.11)、(48.35±0.33)、(52.92±0.28) ml, BNP: (6.21±1.49)、(5.79±0.13)、(5.52±0.08) ng/L,RDW:(14.53±1.76)%、(13.58±0.13)%、(13.28±0.15)%;同侧+对侧侧支循环组LVEF: (45.6±8.8)%、(48.8±0.7)%、(49.6±0.8)%,LVEDV: (47.84±5.36)、(51.96±0.85)、(50.89±0.88) ml,BNP: (6.13 ± 1.85)、(5.65±0.12)、(5.31±0.16) ng/L,RDW: (14.34±1.62)%、(13.32 ±-0.24)%、(13.03±0.23)%;同侧侧支循环组LNEF: (40.3±8.8)%、(45.5±0.8)%、(45.7±0.9)%, LVEDV:(50.63±6.76)、(49.22 ±0.78)、(56.12±0.96) ml, BNP: (7.38±1.52)、(6.32±0.19)、(5.86±0.16) ng/L,RDW:(14.86±1.87)%、(14.41±0.09)%、(15.23±0.24)%],3组患者术前各指标差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),两两比较术后1个月的LVEF、BNP、RDW水平及术后6个月的LVEF、BNP、LVEDV、RDW水平差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 前降支病变冠心病患者接受PCI治疗对于存在侧支循环患者的心功能改善效果更好,尤其是对存在对侧+同侧侧支循环患者改善明显,对存在对侧侧支循环和同侧侧支循环者次之.
目的 研究前降支病變冠狀動脈粥樣硬化性心髒病(冠心病)患者接受經皮冠狀動脈介入治療(PCI)對側支循環及心功能的影響.方法 選取2011年3月至2013年7月南京明基醫院接受冠狀動脈造影診斷為前降支單支病變的246例冠心病患者作為研究對象,根據側支循環開放情況將患者分為側支循環組(105例)和無側支循環組(141例),側支循環組患者再根據血流來源分為對側側支循環組(58例)、同側+對側側支循環組(26例)、同側側支循環組(21例).比較各組患者PCI治療前後心功能指標[左心室射血分數(LVEF)、左心室舒張末期容積(LVEDV)、B型鈉尿肽(BNP)和紅細胞體積分佈寬度(RDW)]差異.結果 側支循環組和無側支循環組患者在年齡、性彆、高血壓、糖尿病及吸煙史方麵差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).側支循環組與無側支循環組患者術前及術後1、6箇月心功能指標分彆為[側支循環組LVEF:(45.7±9.8)%、(46.6±0.4)%、(47.4±0.4)%,LVEDV:(48.36±6.82)、(48.67±0.28)、(53.12±0.32) ml, BNP: (6.32±1.59)、(5.72±0.08)、(5.59±0.07) ng/L, RDW:(14.59±1.68)%、(13.75±0.07)%、(13.56±0.13)%;無側支循環組LVEF:(43.6±8.8)%、(45.4±0 3)%、(46.3±0.3)% ,LVEDV: (48.51 ±5.36)、(48.87 ±0.26)、(55.36±0.38) ml, BNP: (6.39±1.27)、(6.21±0.09)、(6.05±0.06) ng/L, RDW:(14.86±1.87)%、(14.41±0.09)%、(13.76±0.12)%],2組患者術前各指標差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),側支循環組患者術後1箇月的LVEF、BNP、RDW水平及術後6箇月時的LVEF、BNP、LVEDV、RDW水平與無側支循環組患者比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).對側側支循環組、同側+對側側支循環組、同側側支循環組患者術前及術後l、6箇月心功能指標分彆為[對側側支循環組LVEF:(46.0±8.9)%、(47.7±0.4)%、(48.0±0.4)%,LVEDV: (48.03±7.11)、(48.35±0.33)、(52.92±0.28) ml, BNP: (6.21±1.49)、(5.79±0.13)、(5.52±0.08) ng/L,RDW:(14.53±1.76)%、(13.58±0.13)%、(13.28±0.15)%;同側+對側側支循環組LVEF: (45.6±8.8)%、(48.8±0.7)%、(49.6±0.8)%,LVEDV: (47.84±5.36)、(51.96±0.85)、(50.89±0.88) ml,BNP: (6.13 ± 1.85)、(5.65±0.12)、(5.31±0.16) ng/L,RDW: (14.34±1.62)%、(13.32 ±-0.24)%、(13.03±0.23)%;同側側支循環組LNEF: (40.3±8.8)%、(45.5±0.8)%、(45.7±0.9)%, LVEDV:(50.63±6.76)、(49.22 ±0.78)、(56.12±0.96) ml, BNP: (7.38±1.52)、(6.32±0.19)、(5.86±0.16) ng/L,RDW:(14.86±1.87)%、(14.41±0.09)%、(15.23±0.24)%],3組患者術前各指標差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),兩兩比較術後1箇月的LVEF、BNP、RDW水平及術後6箇月的LVEF、BNP、LVEDV、RDW水平差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).結論 前降支病變冠心病患者接受PCI治療對于存在側支循環患者的心功能改善效果更好,尤其是對存在對側+同側側支循環患者改善明顯,對存在對側側支循環和同側側支循環者次之.
목적 연구전강지병변관상동맥죽양경화성심장병(관심병)환자접수경피관상동맥개입치료(PCI)대측지순배급심공능적영향.방법 선취2011년3월지2013년7월남경명기의원접수관상동맥조영진단위전강지단지병변적246례관심병환자작위연구대상,근거측지순배개방정황장환자분위측지순배조(105례)화무측지순배조(141례),측지순배조환자재근거혈류래원분위대측측지순배조(58례)、동측+대측측지순배조(26례)、동측측지순배조(21례).비교각조환자PCI치료전후심공능지표[좌심실사혈분수(LVEF)、좌심실서장말기용적(LVEDV)、B형납뇨태(BNP)화홍세포체적분포관도(RDW)]차이.결과 측지순배조화무측지순배조환자재년령、성별、고혈압、당뇨병급흡연사방면차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).측지순배조여무측지순배조환자술전급술후1、6개월심공능지표분별위[측지순배조LVEF:(45.7±9.8)%、(46.6±0.4)%、(47.4±0.4)%,LVEDV:(48.36±6.82)、(48.67±0.28)、(53.12±0.32) ml, BNP: (6.32±1.59)、(5.72±0.08)、(5.59±0.07) ng/L, RDW:(14.59±1.68)%、(13.75±0.07)%、(13.56±0.13)%;무측지순배조LVEF:(43.6±8.8)%、(45.4±0 3)%、(46.3±0.3)% ,LVEDV: (48.51 ±5.36)、(48.87 ±0.26)、(55.36±0.38) ml, BNP: (6.39±1.27)、(6.21±0.09)、(6.05±0.06) ng/L, RDW:(14.86±1.87)%、(14.41±0.09)%、(13.76±0.12)%],2조환자술전각지표차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),측지순배조환자술후1개월적LVEF、BNP、RDW수평급술후6개월시적LVEF、BNP、LVEDV、RDW수평여무측지순배조환자비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).대측측지순배조、동측+대측측지순배조、동측측지순배조환자술전급술후l、6개월심공능지표분별위[대측측지순배조LVEF:(46.0±8.9)%、(47.7±0.4)%、(48.0±0.4)%,LVEDV: (48.03±7.11)、(48.35±0.33)、(52.92±0.28) ml, BNP: (6.21±1.49)、(5.79±0.13)、(5.52±0.08) ng/L,RDW:(14.53±1.76)%、(13.58±0.13)%、(13.28±0.15)%;동측+대측측지순배조LVEF: (45.6±8.8)%、(48.8±0.7)%、(49.6±0.8)%,LVEDV: (47.84±5.36)、(51.96±0.85)、(50.89±0.88) ml,BNP: (6.13 ± 1.85)、(5.65±0.12)、(5.31±0.16) ng/L,RDW: (14.34±1.62)%、(13.32 ±-0.24)%、(13.03±0.23)%;동측측지순배조LNEF: (40.3±8.8)%、(45.5±0.8)%、(45.7±0.9)%, LVEDV:(50.63±6.76)、(49.22 ±0.78)、(56.12±0.96) ml, BNP: (7.38±1.52)、(6.32±0.19)、(5.86±0.16) ng/L,RDW:(14.86±1.87)%、(14.41±0.09)%、(15.23±0.24)%],3조환자술전각지표차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),량량비교술후1개월적LVEF、BNP、RDW수평급술후6개월적LVEF、BNP、LVEDV、RDW수평차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).결론 전강지병변관심병환자접수PCI치료대우존재측지순배환자적심공능개선효과경호,우기시대존재대측+동측측지순배환자개선명현,대존재대측측지순배화동측측지순배자차지.
Objective To explore the influence of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on collateral circulation and heart function in coronary heart disease with anterior descending lesion.Methods Totally 246 patients of coronary heart disease with single-vessel of anterior descending lesion confirmed by coronary angiography from March 2011 to July 2013 were enrolled and divided into collateral circulation group (105 cases) and non-collateral circulation group (141 cases);the patients in collateral circulation group were divided into collateral circulation group (58 cases), ipsilateral + contralateral collateral circulation group (26 cases), and ipsilateral collateral circulation group (21 cases).The cardiac function indicators, including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV), B type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and red blood cell volume distribution width (RDW), were compared among groups.Results There were no significant differences between collateral circulation group and non-collateral circulation group regarding age, sex, hypertension, diabetes and smoking (P > 0.05).The cardiac function before operation, 1 and 6 months after operation in collateral circulation group were as followed : LVEF (45.7 ± 9.8) % , (46.6 ± 0.4) % , (47.4 ± 0.4) % , LVEDV (48.36±±6.82), (48.67 ±0.28), (53.12±0.32)ml, BNP (6.32 ±1.59), (5.72±0.08), (5.59 ±0.07) ng/L, RDW (14.59 ± 1.68) %, (13.75 ± 0.07) % , (13.56 ± 0.13) %;in non-collateral circulation group was as followed : LVEF (43.6 ± 8.8) %, (45.4 ± 0.3) %, (46.3 ± 0.3) %, LVEDV (48.51 ± 5.36),(48.87±0.26), (55.36 ±0.38) ml, BNP (6.39±1.27), (6.21 ±0.09), (6.05 ±0.06) ng/L, RDW (14.86 ± 1.87) %, (14.41 ± 0.09) %, (13.76 ± 0.12) %.Above indicators were not significantly different between groups;the levels of LVEF, BNP, RDW 1 month after operation, the levels of LVEF, BNP, LVEDV,RDW 6 months after operation in non-collateral circulation group were significantly improved compared with those in collateral circulation group (P < 0.05).The cardiac function before operation, 1 and 6 months after operation in contralateral collateral circulation group were as followed : LVEF (46.0 ± 8.9) % , (47.7 ± 0.4) % , (48.0 ±0.4)%, LVEDV (48.03 ±7.11), (48.35 ±0.33), (52.92 ±0.28) ml, BNP(6.21 ± 1.49), (5.79±0.13), (5.52 ± 0.08) ng/L, RDW (14.53 ± 1.76) %, (13.58 ± 0.13) %, (13.28 ± 0.15) %;in ipsilateral +contralateral collateral circulation group was as followed : LVEF (45.6 ± 8.8) %, (48.8 ± 0.7) % , (49.6 ±0.8)%, LVEDV (47.84 ±5.36), (51.96 ±0.85), (50.89 ±0.88) ml, BNP (6.13±1.85), (5.65 ±0.12), (5.31 ±0.16) ng/L, RDW (14.34 ± 1.62)%, (13.32 ±0.24)%, (13.03 ±0.23)%;in ipsilateral collateral circulation group was as followed: LVEF (40.3± 8.8)%, (45.5 ±0.8)%, (45.7 ±0.9)%,LVEDV: (50.63 ±6.76), (49.22 ±0.78), (56.12 ±0.96) ml, BNP (7.38 ± 1.52), (6.32±0.19),(5.86±0.16) ng/L, RDW (14.86±1.87)% , (14.41 ±0.09)% , (15.23 ±0.24)%.Above indicators were not significantly different among groups before operation (P > 0.05).The levels of LVEF, BNP, RDW 1 month after operation, the levels of LVEF, BNP, LVEDV, RDW 6 months after operation were significantly different among contralateral collateral circulation group, ipsilateral + contralateral collateral circulation group and ipsilateral collateral circulation group (P < 0.05).Conclusion In coronary heart disease patients with anterior descending lesion, the effect of PCI in improving heart function was better for those having collateral circulation, especially for ipsilateral and contralateral collateral circulation.