中医临床研究
中醫臨床研究
중의림상연구
Clinical Journal of Chinese Medicine
2015年
33期
90-91
,共2页
溃疡性结肠炎%中医辨证%问题与对策
潰瘍性結腸炎%中醫辨證%問題與對策
궤양성결장염%중의변증%문제여대책
Ulcerative colitis%TCM syndrome differentiation%Problems and countermeasures
目的:研究溃疡性结肠炎中医辨证存在的问题.方法:随机抽取溃疡性结肠炎患者80例.采用回顾性方法分析溃疡性结肠炎中医辨证存在的问题.结果:80例患者中,共21例出现辨证论治问题,概率为26.3%;21例辨证论治问题患者中,辨证分型混乱共9例,占42.9%,辨证标准不统一共7例,占33.3%,证与证候混淆共3例,占14.8%,其他问题共2例,占9.5%(P<0.05);其中辨证分型混乱问题中,单纯从阴阳论治占37.2%,单纯从肠论治占25.2%,创新性论治占18.1%,完全参照《标准》论治占10.2%,完全参照《原则》论治占9.3%,单纯从阴阳论治造成辨证分型混乱所占的比例,明显高于其他原因(P<0. 05),以上差异具有统计学意义.结论:溃疡性结肠炎中医辨证存在一些问题,最为常见的是辨证分型混乱.
目的:研究潰瘍性結腸炎中醫辨證存在的問題.方法:隨機抽取潰瘍性結腸炎患者80例.採用迴顧性方法分析潰瘍性結腸炎中醫辨證存在的問題.結果:80例患者中,共21例齣現辨證論治問題,概率為26.3%;21例辨證論治問題患者中,辨證分型混亂共9例,佔42.9%,辨證標準不統一共7例,佔33.3%,證與證候混淆共3例,佔14.8%,其他問題共2例,佔9.5%(P<0.05);其中辨證分型混亂問題中,單純從陰暘論治佔37.2%,單純從腸論治佔25.2%,創新性論治佔18.1%,完全參照《標準》論治佔10.2%,完全參照《原則》論治佔9.3%,單純從陰暘論治造成辨證分型混亂所佔的比例,明顯高于其他原因(P<0. 05),以上差異具有統計學意義.結論:潰瘍性結腸炎中醫辨證存在一些問題,最為常見的是辨證分型混亂.
목적:연구궤양성결장염중의변증존재적문제.방법:수궤추취궤양성결장염환자80례.채용회고성방법분석궤양성결장염중의변증존재적문제.결과:80례환자중,공21례출현변증론치문제,개솔위26.3%;21례변증론치문제환자중,변증분형혼란공9례,점42.9%,변증표준불통일공7례,점33.3%,증여증후혼효공3례,점14.8%,기타문제공2례,점9.5%(P<0.05);기중변증분형혼란문제중,단순종음양론치점37.2%,단순종장론치점25.2%,창신성론치점18.1%,완전삼조《표준》론치점10.2%,완전삼조《원칙》론치점9.3%,단순종음양론치조성변증분형혼란소점적비례,명현고우기타원인(P<0. 05),이상차이구유통계학의의.결론:궤양성결장염중의변증존재일사문제,최위상견적시변증분형혼란.
Objective: To study the problems of TCM syndrome differentiation in ulcerative colitis. Methods: 80 patients with ulcerative colitis were randomly selected. To analyze the existing problems of TCM syndrome differentiation of ulcerative colitis by using a retrospective method. Results: 21 cases of patients had syndrome differentiation problems and treatment, the problem rate was 26.3%, 33.3%, 14.3%, 9.52%, 25.2%,3 7.2%, 10.2%, 18.1%, 9.34%, 42.9% respectively, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: there are some problems in the TCM syndrome differentiation of ulcerative colitis, the most common is the confusion of syndrome differentiation.
