转化医学电子杂志
轉化醫學電子雜誌
전화의학전자잡지
E-Journal of Translational Medicine
2015年
9期
49-50
,共2页
李永崇%蔡天勇%马晗%李永刚%凡豫新%江涛
李永崇%蔡天勇%馬晗%李永剛%凡豫新%江濤
리영숭%채천용%마함%리영강%범예신%강도
ABP%治疗策略%临床分析
ABP%治療策略%臨床分析
ABP%치료책략%림상분석
ABP%treatment strategy%clinical analysis
目的:探讨急性胆源性胰腺炎的临床治疗策略.方法:选取2014-01/2015-01我院收治的38例急性胆源性胰腺炎患者,根据病理检查、实验室检查结果分为梗阻组( n=16) ,行手术治疗;非梗阻组( n=22) ,行保守治疗和手术治疗. 对比两组的临床疗效、术后并发症情况. 结果:两组的治愈率、总有效率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而梗阻组的术后并发症率显著高于非梗阻组,差异具有统计学意义( P<0.05) . 结论:梗阻型急性胆源性胰腺炎患者病情急、危险大,应立即实施腹腔镜辅助下的胆囊切除术或取石并予以清创引流,而由于缺少抗炎治疗、胃肠减压、平衡电解质、抑酸等保守治疗措施,梗阻型急性胆源性胰腺炎患者在术后更容易发生并发症,在临床中对于急性胆源性胰腺炎患者宜采取病情评估、保守治疗和手术治疗相结合的策略.
目的:探討急性膽源性胰腺炎的臨床治療策略.方法:選取2014-01/2015-01我院收治的38例急性膽源性胰腺炎患者,根據病理檢查、實驗室檢查結果分為梗阻組( n=16) ,行手術治療;非梗阻組( n=22) ,行保守治療和手術治療. 對比兩組的臨床療效、術後併髮癥情況. 結果:兩組的治愈率、總有效率比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),而梗阻組的術後併髮癥率顯著高于非梗阻組,差異具有統計學意義( P<0.05) . 結論:梗阻型急性膽源性胰腺炎患者病情急、危險大,應立即實施腹腔鏡輔助下的膽囊切除術或取石併予以清創引流,而由于缺少抗炎治療、胃腸減壓、平衡電解質、抑痠等保守治療措施,梗阻型急性膽源性胰腺炎患者在術後更容易髮生併髮癥,在臨床中對于急性膽源性胰腺炎患者宜採取病情評估、保守治療和手術治療相結閤的策略.
목적:탐토급성담원성이선염적림상치료책략.방법:선취2014-01/2015-01아원수치적38례급성담원성이선염환자,근거병리검사、실험실검사결과분위경조조( n=16) ,행수술치료;비경조조( n=22) ,행보수치료화수술치료. 대비량조적림상료효、술후병발증정황. 결과:량조적치유솔、총유효솔비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),이경조조적술후병발증솔현저고우비경조조,차이구유통계학의의( P<0.05) . 결론:경조형급성담원성이선염환자병정급、위험대,응립즉실시복강경보조하적담낭절제술혹취석병여이청창인류,이유우결소항염치료、위장감압、평형전해질、억산등보수치료조시,경조형급성담원성이선염환자재술후경용역발생병발증,재림상중대우급성담원성이선염환자의채취병정평고、보수치료화수술치료상결합적책략.
AIM:To investigate the clinical treatment strategy of acute biliary pancreatitis. METHODS: According to the results of pathological examination and laboratory examination, 38 patients admitted into our hospital from January 2014 to January 2015 with acute biliary pancreatitis were divided into obstruction group(n=16) and non-obstruction group ( n=22 ) . The former was treated by operation, and the latter were treated by non-operative treatment and operative treatment. The clinical efficacy and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS:The cure rate and total effective rate of the two groups were not statistically significant ( P>0.05) , and the postoperative complication rate in obstruction group was significantly higher than that of the non-obstruction group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The patients with obstructive ABP disease are urgent and dangerous, and they should be carried out laparoscopic cholecystectomy or stone removal and debridement and drainage, and due to the lack of anti-inflammatory treatment, gastrointestinal decompression, balanced electrolyte, acid suppression and other conservative treatment measures, patients with ABP are more prone to experiencing complications after surgery. Therefore, disease evaluation, conservative treatment and conservative treatment strategy should be applied to patients with ABP .