转化医学电子杂志
轉化醫學電子雜誌
전화의학전자잡지
E-Journal of Translational Medicine
2015年
9期
6-7
,共2页
阿米卡星%ICU病房%肺部感染%临床疗效
阿米卡星%ICU病房%肺部感染%臨床療效
아미잡성%ICU병방%폐부감염%림상료효
amikacin%ICU ward%pulmonary infection%clinical curative effect
目的:探讨阿米卡星治疗ICU病房中肺部感染的临床疗效. 方法:选取本院ICU病房中肺部感染患者54例作为研究对象,将其随机分为研究组( 28例)和对照组( 26例) . 研究组患者给予阿米卡星治疗,对照组患者给予阿莫西林治疗.比较两组患者治疗后的临床疗效. 结果:阿米卡星组治疗后的总有效率为 92. 86%,阿莫西林组治疗后的总有效率为73.08%,比较两组患者治疗后的总有效率,差异有统计学意义( P<0.05) . 结论:对ICU病房中的肺部感染患者实施阿米卡星治疗疗效显著,值得临床推广.
目的:探討阿米卡星治療ICU病房中肺部感染的臨床療效. 方法:選取本院ICU病房中肺部感染患者54例作為研究對象,將其隨機分為研究組( 28例)和對照組( 26例) . 研究組患者給予阿米卡星治療,對照組患者給予阿莫西林治療.比較兩組患者治療後的臨床療效. 結果:阿米卡星組治療後的總有效率為 92. 86%,阿莫西林組治療後的總有效率為73.08%,比較兩組患者治療後的總有效率,差異有統計學意義( P<0.05) . 結論:對ICU病房中的肺部感染患者實施阿米卡星治療療效顯著,值得臨床推廣.
목적:탐토아미잡성치료ICU병방중폐부감염적림상료효. 방법:선취본원ICU병방중폐부감염환자54례작위연구대상,장기수궤분위연구조( 28례)화대조조( 26례) . 연구조환자급여아미잡성치료,대조조환자급여아막서림치료.비교량조환자치료후적림상료효. 결과:아미잡성조치료후적총유효솔위 92. 86%,아막서림조치료후적총유효솔위73.08%,비교량조환자치료후적총유효솔,차이유통계학의의( P<0.05) . 결론:대ICU병방중적폐부감염환자실시아미잡성치료료효현저,치득림상추엄.
AIM: To investigate the clinical effect of Amikacin in the treatment of pulmonary infection in ICU ward. METH-ODS: A total of 54 patients with pulmonary infection admitted into our hospital were randomly divided into study group and control group, 28 cases in the study group and 26 cases in the control group, the study group were treated with amikacin, and the control group was treated with amoxicillin. The clinical efficacy of the two groups after treatment was compared. RESULTS: The total effective rate was 92.86% after treatment in the study group, while the total effective rate was 73.08% after treatment in the control group, the difference between two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The effect of amikacin in the treatment of patients with pulmonary infection in ICU ward is significant, and it is worthy of clinical promotion.
