医院管理论坛
醫院管理論罈
의원관이론단
Hospital Management Forum
2015年
11期
33-35
,共3页
糖尿病%健康管理模式%医院
糖尿病%健康管理模式%醫院
당뇨병%건강관리모식%의원
Diabetes%Health management mode%Hospital
目的 探讨干部保健科糖尿病患者医院健康管理模式的应用效果.方法 选择2012年3月至2014年3月本院干部保健科糖尿病患者134例,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组67例.对观察组实施医院健康管理模式,对照组实施传统健康管理模式.管理结束半年后对两组患者进行随访,比较管理效果.结果 经管理后,观察组患者生理生化指标均显著优于对照组,且较管理前均显著改善(P<0.05),而对照组中仅空腹血糖有明显改善,其余各生理生化指标仅轻度改善,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);经管理后,观察组患者不良生活方式均显著改善,而对照组患者并未得到有效改善;经管理后,观察组患者除社会维度外其他指标均显著优于对照组,且较管理前均显著改善,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),而对照组患者远期生活质量并未得到满意改善.结论 医院健康管理有利于控制患者病情,有助患者改善不良生活习惯,可有效提高患者生活质量.
目的 探討榦部保健科糖尿病患者醫院健康管理模式的應用效果.方法 選擇2012年3月至2014年3月本院榦部保健科糖尿病患者134例,隨機分為觀察組和對照組,每組67例.對觀察組實施醫院健康管理模式,對照組實施傳統健康管理模式.管理結束半年後對兩組患者進行隨訪,比較管理效果.結果 經管理後,觀察組患者生理生化指標均顯著優于對照組,且較管理前均顯著改善(P<0.05),而對照組中僅空腹血糖有明顯改善,其餘各生理生化指標僅輕度改善,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);經管理後,觀察組患者不良生活方式均顯著改善,而對照組患者併未得到有效改善;經管理後,觀察組患者除社會維度外其他指標均顯著優于對照組,且較管理前均顯著改善,差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05),而對照組患者遠期生活質量併未得到滿意改善.結論 醫院健康管理有利于控製患者病情,有助患者改善不良生活習慣,可有效提高患者生活質量.
목적 탐토간부보건과당뇨병환자의원건강관리모식적응용효과.방법 선택2012년3월지2014년3월본원간부보건과당뇨병환자134례,수궤분위관찰조화대조조,매조67례.대관찰조실시의원건강관리모식,대조조실시전통건강관리모식.관리결속반년후대량조환자진행수방,비교관리효과.결과 경관리후,관찰조환자생리생화지표균현저우우대조조,차교관리전균현저개선(P<0.05),이대조조중부공복혈당유명현개선,기여각생리생화지표부경도개선,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);경관리후,관찰조환자불량생활방식균현저개선,이대조조환자병미득도유효개선;경관리후,관찰조환자제사회유도외기타지표균현저우우대조조,차교관리전균현저개선,차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05),이대조조환자원기생활질량병미득도만의개선.결론 의원건강관리유리우공제환자병정,유조환자개선불량생활습관,가유효제고환자생활질량.
Objective To explore the application effect of health management model in hospital among diabetes patients from cadre's healthcare department.Methods In total of 134 diabetes patients who received treatment in cadres' healthcare department from March 2012 to March 2014 were included in our study and divided into observation group and control group randomly with 67 patients in each group. Health management model in hospital was adopted in observation group, while traditional health management model was adopted in control group. We compared the effect of management of the two groups based on follow-up among patients in the two groups half a year after the end of management. Results After management, physiological and biochemical indexes in observation group were significantly better than that in control group and significantly better than that in observation group before management (P<0.05). However, in control group, only fasting blood-glucose was significantly improved and other physiological and biochemical indexes were just improved slightly without statistical significance; After management, patients' lifestyle in observation group was improved significantly while that in control group was not improved effectively; After management, all indexes except indexes of sociological dimension in observation group were significantly better than that in control group and were better than that in observation group before management, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The long-term life quality of patients in control group was not improved effectively. Conclusion Health management model in hospital was conducive to help patients control their condition and improve their lifestyle and life quality.
