现代临床护理
現代臨床護理
현대림상호리
MODERN CLINICAL NURSING
2013年
8期
56-60
,共5页
急性心肌梗死%介入治疗%康复训练
急性心肌梗死%介入治療%康複訓練
급성심기경사%개입치료%강복훈련
acute myocardial infarction%interventional treatment%rehabilitative training
目的探讨10 d康复程序在急性心肌梗死(acute myocardial infarction,AMI)患者介入术后心脏康复中的应用效果。方法将80例AMI行介入手术后无并发症的患者随机分为观察组与对照组,每组各40例,对照组按照临床路径实施两周的心脏康复训练,观察组在对照组基础上优化路径实施10 d心脏康复训练。比较两组患者出院时左室射血分数(left ventricular ejection fraction,LVEF)、生活自理能力、心功能分级、并发症发生率、住院时间和住院费用情况。结果出院时观察组患者LVEF、生活自理能力、心功能分级明显优于对照组,两组比较,均P<0.05,差异具有统计学意义;两组患者并发症发生率比较,均P>0.05,差异无统计学意义;观察组患者住院时间明显短于对照组,住院费用明显少于对照组,两组比较,均P<0.01,差异具有统计学意义。结论10 d心脏康复程序有利于患者心脏的康复,而且缩短住院时间和减少住院费用,值得临床推广应用。
目的探討10 d康複程序在急性心肌梗死(acute myocardial infarction,AMI)患者介入術後心髒康複中的應用效果。方法將80例AMI行介入手術後無併髮癥的患者隨機分為觀察組與對照組,每組各40例,對照組按照臨床路徑實施兩週的心髒康複訓練,觀察組在對照組基礎上優化路徑實施10 d心髒康複訓練。比較兩組患者齣院時左室射血分數(left ventricular ejection fraction,LVEF)、生活自理能力、心功能分級、併髮癥髮生率、住院時間和住院費用情況。結果齣院時觀察組患者LVEF、生活自理能力、心功能分級明顯優于對照組,兩組比較,均P<0.05,差異具有統計學意義;兩組患者併髮癥髮生率比較,均P>0.05,差異無統計學意義;觀察組患者住院時間明顯短于對照組,住院費用明顯少于對照組,兩組比較,均P<0.01,差異具有統計學意義。結論10 d心髒康複程序有利于患者心髒的康複,而且縮短住院時間和減少住院費用,值得臨床推廣應用。
목적탐토10 d강복정서재급성심기경사(acute myocardial infarction,AMI)환자개입술후심장강복중적응용효과。방법장80례AMI행개입수술후무병발증적환자수궤분위관찰조여대조조,매조각40례,대조조안조림상로경실시량주적심장강복훈련,관찰조재대조조기출상우화로경실시10 d심장강복훈련。비교량조환자출원시좌실사혈분수(left ventricular ejection fraction,LVEF)、생활자리능력、심공능분급、병발증발생솔、주원시간화주원비용정황。결과출원시관찰조환자LVEF、생활자리능력、심공능분급명현우우대조조,량조비교,균P<0.05,차이구유통계학의의;량조환자병발증발생솔비교,균P>0.05,차이무통계학의의;관찰조환자주원시간명현단우대조조,주원비용명현소우대조조,량조비교,균P<0.01,차이구유통계학의의。결론10 d심장강복정서유리우환자심장적강복,이차축단주원시간화감소주원비용,치득림상추엄응용。
Objective To compare the different effects of two rehabilitative therapies on cardiac rehabilitation of patients with acute myocardial infarction after interventional program.Methods Eighty AMI patients with no complications after interventional treatment were randomized equally into the observation group and the control group.The patients in the control group were given two-week cardiac rehabilitative training in line with the clinical nursing pathway.Besides the treatment in the control group,those in the observation group were given 10-day cardiac rehabilitative training by optimizing the nursing pathway.The two groups were compared in terms of left ventricular ejection fraction,self-care ability,heart function grading,incidence of complications,hospital stay and hospitalization cost.Results At discharge,The observation group was significantly better than the control group in terms of left ventricular ejection fraction,self-care ability and grading of cardiac function(all P<0.05).In regard to the incidence of complications,there was no statistically significant difference between the groups.Hospital stay in the observation group was obviously shorter than that in the control group and the hospitalization cost significantly less than that in the control group(P<0.01).Conclusion The 10-day cardiac rehabilitation program can promote patients’recovery,shorten the hospital stay and reduce the medical expense.