中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
CHINA FOREIGN MEDICAL TREATMENT
2014年
12期
143-144,146
,共3页
焦虑症患者%心理分析及治疗%护理干预%影响与重要意义
焦慮癥患者%心理分析及治療%護理榦預%影響與重要意義
초필증환자%심리분석급치료%호리간예%영향여중요의의
Patients with anxiety disorder%Psychological analysis and treatment%Nursing intervention%Effect and significance
目的：讨论研究对焦虑症患者进行心理分析及护理干预的影响和重要意义。方法随机选取就诊于该院内科确诊的焦虑症患者100例。分组为干预组、普通组，各50例。其中为普通组患者提供一般常规干预，包括心理指导以及宣讲基本知识；干预组给予患者综合护理干预，如讲解忧郁症基本知识，进行心理分析及心理护理等。比较两组患者经过不同护理干预后焦虑评分以及治疗时间、护理满意程度等指标。结果护理后SAS评分干预组轻度焦虑（41.6±1.2）分，中度（48.3±2.0）分，重度（56.6±1.8）分；对照组轻度焦虑（44.7±2.6）分，中度（53.2±3.6）分，重度（60.2±3.7）分；两组患者不同护理后焦虑评分比较显示经完善护理干预后干预组患者焦虑评分显著优于常规干预组患者差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；护理满意度比较显示干预组护理后满意度100%显著优于普通组90.0%差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论对焦虑症患者进行心理分析及治疗联合护理干预疗效显著。能够有效缓解并消除患者焦虑、不安等负面情绪，减轻心理压力。通过干预使患者不断调整自我状态，减轻疾病症状，恢复生活质量。
目的：討論研究對焦慮癥患者進行心理分析及護理榦預的影響和重要意義。方法隨機選取就診于該院內科確診的焦慮癥患者100例。分組為榦預組、普通組，各50例。其中為普通組患者提供一般常規榦預，包括心理指導以及宣講基本知識；榦預組給予患者綜閤護理榦預，如講解憂鬱癥基本知識，進行心理分析及心理護理等。比較兩組患者經過不同護理榦預後焦慮評分以及治療時間、護理滿意程度等指標。結果護理後SAS評分榦預組輕度焦慮（41.6±1.2）分，中度（48.3±2.0）分，重度（56.6±1.8）分；對照組輕度焦慮（44.7±2.6）分，中度（53.2±3.6）分，重度（60.2±3.7）分；兩組患者不同護理後焦慮評分比較顯示經完善護理榦預後榦預組患者焦慮評分顯著優于常規榦預組患者差異有統計學意義（P＜0.05）；護理滿意度比較顯示榦預組護理後滿意度100%顯著優于普通組90.0%差異有統計學意義（P＜0.05）。結論對焦慮癥患者進行心理分析及治療聯閤護理榦預療效顯著。能夠有效緩解併消除患者焦慮、不安等負麵情緒，減輕心理壓力。通過榦預使患者不斷調整自我狀態，減輕疾病癥狀，恢複生活質量。
목적：토론연구대초필증환자진행심리분석급호리간예적영향화중요의의。방법수궤선취취진우해원내과학진적초필증환자100례。분조위간예조、보통조，각50례。기중위보통조환자제공일반상규간예，포괄심리지도이급선강기본지식；간예조급여환자종합호리간예，여강해우욱증기본지식，진행심리분석급심리호리등。비교량조환자경과불동호리간예후초필평분이급치료시간、호리만의정도등지표。결과호리후SAS평분간예조경도초필（41.6±1.2）분，중도（48.3±2.0）분，중도（56.6±1.8）분；대조조경도초필（44.7±2.6）분，중도（53.2±3.6）분，중도（60.2±3.7）분；량조환자불동호리후초필평분비교현시경완선호리간예후간예조환자초필평분현저우우상규간예조환자차이유통계학의의（P＜0.05）；호리만의도비교현시간예조호리후만의도100%현저우우보통조90.0%차이유통계학의의（P＜0.05）。결론대초필증환자진행심리분석급치료연합호리간예료효현저。능구유효완해병소제환자초필、불안등부면정서，감경심리압력。통과간예사환자불단조정자아상태，감경질병증상，회복생활질량。
Objective To discuss the effect of psychological analysis and nursing intervention for patients with anxiety disorders and its significance. Methods 100 anxiety patients admitted in Department of Internal Medicine of our hospital were randomly se-lected and divided into intervention group and normal group with 50 cases in each. The patients in the normal group were given conventional intervention, including psychological guidance and explaining the basic knowledge, and patients in the intervention group were given comprehensive nursing intervention, such as explaining the basic knowledge about depression, psychological analysis and psychological nursing and so on. The anxiety score, treatment time and nursing satisfaction of two groups of patients were compared. Results The SAS score after nursing:intervention group with mild anxiety (41.6 ± 1.2) points, moderate (48.3 ± 2.0) points, severe (56.6 ± 1.8) points;the control group with mild anxiety (44.7 ± 2.6)points, moderate (53.2 ± 3.6) points, severe (60.2 ± 3.7) points. The above comparison results showed that the anxiety scores of the intervention group patients were better than those of the normal group patients (P<0.05); The nursing satisfaction of the intervention group was 100%, significantly superior to the normal group's 90.0%(P<0.05). Conclusion Psychological analysis and treatment combined with nursing intervention have signifi-cant effect on anxiety patients, which can effectively alleviate and eliminate the anxiety and other negative emotions of the pa-tients, and relieve mental pressure. By the intervention, the ego state of the patients can be adjusted continuously, the symptoms of the patients can be alleviated, and the quality of life can be restored.
