中外健康文摘
中外健康文摘
중외건강문적
WORLD HEALTH DIGEST
2013年
11期
264-265
,共2页
中药热敷%腰硬联麻%术后腰痛
中藥熱敷%腰硬聯痳%術後腰痛
중약열부%요경련마%술후요통
Chinese medicine hot compress%waist epidural anesthesia%postoperative lumbar pain
目的观察中药热敷疗法治疗腰硬联麻妇产科术后腰痛的临床疗效,将符合纳入标准及排除标准的腰硬联麻妇产科术后腰痛患者192例,按1:1:1随机分为三组:常规护理组、普通热敷组及中药热敷组,每组各64例,中药热敷组给予常规护理及中药热敷腰部,观察指标采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)、McGill疼痛问卷简表及自创腰痛评分表进行评分,建立数据库并进行统计分析,结果显示,常规护理组有效率为35.88﹪;采用普通热敷法有效率为59.06﹪;而运用中药(吴茱萸加白芥子)热敷疗法组有效率可达93.75﹪。其中有效率在常规护理组和普通热敷组及中药热敷组中相比差异均为极显著(P<0.01)
目的觀察中藥熱敷療法治療腰硬聯痳婦產科術後腰痛的臨床療效,將符閤納入標準及排除標準的腰硬聯痳婦產科術後腰痛患者192例,按1:1:1隨機分為三組:常規護理組、普通熱敷組及中藥熱敷組,每組各64例,中藥熱敷組給予常規護理及中藥熱敷腰部,觀察指標採用視覺模擬量錶(VAS)、McGill疼痛問捲簡錶及自創腰痛評分錶進行評分,建立數據庫併進行統計分析,結果顯示,常規護理組有效率為35.88﹪;採用普通熱敷法有效率為59.06﹪;而運用中藥(吳茱萸加白芥子)熱敷療法組有效率可達93.75﹪。其中有效率在常規護理組和普通熱敷組及中藥熱敷組中相比差異均為極顯著(P<0.01)
목적관찰중약열부요법치료요경련마부산과술후요통적림상료효,장부합납입표준급배제표준적요경련마부산과술후요통환자192례,안1:1:1수궤분위삼조:상규호리조、보통열부조급중약열부조,매조각64례,중약열부조급여상규호리급중약열부요부,관찰지표채용시각모의량표(VAS)、McGill동통문권간표급자창요통평분표진행평분,건립수거고병진행통계분석,결과현시,상규호리조유효솔위35.88﹪;채용보통열부법유효솔위59.06﹪;이운용중약(오수유가백개자)열부요법조유효솔가체93.75﹪。기중유효솔재상규호리조화보통열부조급중약열부조중상비차이균위겁현저(P<0.01)
Objective To observe Chinese medcine fomentation therapy how to cure patient after the waist epidural anesthesia, which is kind of gynecologic surgery. To study a kind of nursing methods for postoperative lumbar pain after the waist epidural anesthesia, which is effective, simple, convenient and more economic. And also expand the clinical application of traditional Chinese medicine fomentation therapy. Methods Make a sample of patients after the waist epidural anesthesia total in 192 cases of lumbar pain, according to the proportion of randomly divided into three groups: normal nursing group, ordinary hot compress group and traditional Chinese medicine fomentation groups, each group of the 64 cases. Normal nursing group was given only normal nusring care. Common hot compress group was given conventional nursing care and hot water bag compressing the waist and traditional Chinese medicine fomentation group was given normal nursing care and chinese medcine compressing waist. Observe index using visual analog scale (VAS), McGill pain questionnaire short list and a waist pain rating scale. Establish the database and make a statistical analysis. Results The effective rate of each group respectively is 35.88%, 59.06% and 93.75%. Conclusions Ordinary hot compress group and traditional Chinese medicine fomentation group have higher effiency than normal nursing group. The most efficient way is traditional Chinese medicine fomentation.